Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Effect of a polyhexamethylene biguanide mouthrinse on bacterial counts and plaque

View through CrossRef
AbstractObjectives: For various clinical applications, polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) has been used for many years as an antiseptic in medicine. Little is known, however, of its antibacterial activity in the oral cavity and its ability to inhibit plaque formation. In this study, a 0.04% PHMB mouthrinse (A) was compared with a negative control placebo rinse (10% ethanol, flavour) (B) and 2 positive control chlorhexidine rinses, one of which was a 0.12% aqueous solution (C) and the other a commercially available mouthrinse (Skinsept® mucosa) diluted to a chlorhexidine concentration of 0.12% (D).Material and Methods: The study was a double‐blind, randomised 4‐replicate 4×4 Latin square cross‐over design. Plaque regrowth was assessed with the Turesky et al. modification of the Quigley and Hein plaque index. The in vivo antibacterial effect was assessed by taking bacterial counts from the tooth surface (smears from the lingual surface of 16) and mucosa (smears from the buccal mucosa) 4 h after the 1st rinse with the preparations on day 1 and prior to the clinical examination on day 5. 16 volunteers participated, and on day 1 of each study period were rendered plaque‐free, ceased toothcleaning, and rinsed 2× daily with the allocated mouthrinse. On day 5, plaque was scored and smears were collected according to the protocol. Washout periods were 9 days. Data were analysed using ANOVA with Tukey HSD adjustment for multiple comparisons (significance level α=0.05).Results: Mouthrinses A, C, and D were significantly more effective in inhibiting plaque than the placebo (B). Mouthrinse C was significantly better than mouthrinses A and D, while mouthrinses D and A were equally effective in inhibiting plaque. Bacterial count reductions on the tooth surface with mouthrinse C were significantly greater compared to mouthrinse A and the placebo (B). The reduction of bacterial counts on the mucosa with C was significantly greater than with A and B after 4 h and significantly greater than with A, B and D after 5 days. Mouthrinse A reduced bacteria on the mucosa significantly more effectively than the placebo (B) after 4 h and 5 days, while mouthrinse D was more effective than the placebo (B) after 4 h.Conclusion: The results indicate that a 0.04% PHMB mouthwash inhibits plaque regrowth and reduces oral bacterial counts, and may be used in preventive applications in the oral cavity.
Title: Effect of a polyhexamethylene biguanide mouthrinse on bacterial counts and plaque
Description:
AbstractObjectives: For various clinical applications, polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) has been used for many years as an antiseptic in medicine.
Little is known, however, of its antibacterial activity in the oral cavity and its ability to inhibit plaque formation.
In this study, a 0.
04% PHMB mouthrinse (A) was compared with a negative control placebo rinse (10% ethanol, flavour) (B) and 2 positive control chlorhexidine rinses, one of which was a 0.
12% aqueous solution (C) and the other a commercially available mouthrinse (Skinsept® mucosa) diluted to a chlorhexidine concentration of 0.
12% (D).
Material and Methods: The study was a double‐blind, randomised 4‐replicate 4×4 Latin square cross‐over design.
Plaque regrowth was assessed with the Turesky et al.
modification of the Quigley and Hein plaque index.
The in vivo antibacterial effect was assessed by taking bacterial counts from the tooth surface (smears from the lingual surface of 16) and mucosa (smears from the buccal mucosa) 4 h after the 1st rinse with the preparations on day 1 and prior to the clinical examination on day 5.
16 volunteers participated, and on day 1 of each study period were rendered plaque‐free, ceased toothcleaning, and rinsed 2× daily with the allocated mouthrinse.
On day 5, plaque was scored and smears were collected according to the protocol.
Washout periods were 9 days.
Data were analysed using ANOVA with Tukey HSD adjustment for multiple comparisons (significance level α=0.
05).
Results: Mouthrinses A, C, and D were significantly more effective in inhibiting plaque than the placebo (B).
Mouthrinse C was significantly better than mouthrinses A and D, while mouthrinses D and A were equally effective in inhibiting plaque.
Bacterial count reductions on the tooth surface with mouthrinse C were significantly greater compared to mouthrinse A and the placebo (B).
The reduction of bacterial counts on the mucosa with C was significantly greater than with A and B after 4 h and significantly greater than with A, B and D after 5 days.
Mouthrinse A reduced bacteria on the mucosa significantly more effectively than the placebo (B) after 4 h and 5 days, while mouthrinse D was more effective than the placebo (B) after 4 h.
Conclusion: The results indicate that a 0.
04% PHMB mouthwash inhibits plaque regrowth and reduces oral bacterial counts, and may be used in preventive applications in the oral cavity.

Related Results

A Systematic Review of the Potential Effects of Lippia sidoides on Dental Plaque and Periodontal Diseases
A Systematic Review of the Potential Effects of Lippia sidoides on Dental Plaque and Periodontal Diseases
Abstract Lippia sidoides is a typical shrub from Brazil that has been used in traditional medicine. This is a systematic review on the effect of L. sidoides for controlli...
e0474 Effect of plaque distribution to biomechanical
e0474 Effect of plaque distribution to biomechanical
Introduction we presume that the plaque vulnerability of mildly lesions will be related to its intrinsic structural features and biomechanical characteristics. Ho...
Diagnostic efficacy of CCTA and CT-FFR based on risk factors for myocardial ischemia
Diagnostic efficacy of CCTA and CT-FFR based on risk factors for myocardial ischemia
Abstract Background Coronary artery coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can observe the degree of coronary artery stenosis and fractiona...
Source number counts at high energies: Swift versus NuSTAR
Source number counts at high energies: Swift versus NuSTAR
The hard X-ray sky at energies above 10 keV has been extensively explored by the Swift/Gehrels and the NuSTAR missions in the 14−195 keV and the 3−24 keV bands. respectively. The m...

Back to Top