Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, multi-center trial in healthy subjects to investigate the effects of lacosamide, pregabalin, and tapentadol on biomarkers of pain processing observed by electroencephal

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 is one of four similarly designed clinical studies aiming at profiling a set of functional biomarkers of drug effects on the nociceptive system that could serve to accelerate the future development of analgesics, by providing a quantitative understanding between drug exposure and effects of the drug on nociceptive signal processing in human volunteers. IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 will focus on biomarkers derived from non-invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) measures of brain activity. Methods This is a multisite single-dose, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-period, 4-way crossover, pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) study in healthy subjects. Biomarkers derived from scalp EEG measurements (laser-evoked brain potentials [LEPs], pinprick-evoked brain potentials [PEPs], resting EEG) will be obtained before and three times after administration of three medications known to act on the nociceptive system (lacosamide, pregabalin, tapentadol) and placebo, given as a single oral dose in separate study periods. Medication effects will be assessed concurrently in a non-sensitized normal condition and a clinically relevant hyperalgesic condition (high-frequency electrical stimulation of the skin). Patient-reported outcomes will also be collected. A sequentially rejective multiple testing approach will be used with overall alpha error of the primary analysis split between LEP and PEP under tapentadol. Remaining treatment arm effects on LEP or PEP or effects on EEG are key secondary confirmatory analyses. Complex statistical analyses and PK-PD modeling are exploratory. Discussion LEPs and PEPs are brain responses related to the selective activation of thermonociceptors and mechanonociceptors. Their amplitudes are dependent on the responsiveness of these nociceptors and the state of the pathways relaying nociceptive input at the level of the spinal cord and brain. The magnitude of resting EEG oscillations is sensitive to changes in brain network function, and some modulations of oscillation magnitude can relate to perceived pain intensity, variations in vigilance, and attentional states. These oscillations can also be affected by analgesic drugs acting on the central nervous system. For these reasons, IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 hypothesizes that EEG-derived measures can serve as biomarkers of target engagement of analgesic drugs for future Phase 1 clinical trials. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials could also benefit from these tools for patient stratification. Trial registration This trial was registered 25/06/2019 in EudraCT (2019%2D%2D001204-37).
Title: IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, multi-center trial in healthy subjects to investigate the effects of lacosamide, pregabalin, and tapentadol on biomarkers of pain processing observed by electroencephal
Description:
Abstract Background IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 is one of four similarly designed clinical studies aiming at profiling a set of functional biomarkers of drug effects on the nociceptive system that could serve to accelerate the future development of analgesics, by providing a quantitative understanding between drug exposure and effects of the drug on nociceptive signal processing in human volunteers.
IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 will focus on biomarkers derived from non-invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) measures of brain activity.
Methods This is a multisite single-dose, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-period, 4-way crossover, pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) study in healthy subjects.
Biomarkers derived from scalp EEG measurements (laser-evoked brain potentials [LEPs], pinprick-evoked brain potentials [PEPs], resting EEG) will be obtained before and three times after administration of three medications known to act on the nociceptive system (lacosamide, pregabalin, tapentadol) and placebo, given as a single oral dose in separate study periods.
Medication effects will be assessed concurrently in a non-sensitized normal condition and a clinically relevant hyperalgesic condition (high-frequency electrical stimulation of the skin).
Patient-reported outcomes will also be collected.
A sequentially rejective multiple testing approach will be used with overall alpha error of the primary analysis split between LEP and PEP under tapentadol.
Remaining treatment arm effects on LEP or PEP or effects on EEG are key secondary confirmatory analyses.
Complex statistical analyses and PK-PD modeling are exploratory.
Discussion LEPs and PEPs are brain responses related to the selective activation of thermonociceptors and mechanonociceptors.
Their amplitudes are dependent on the responsiveness of these nociceptors and the state of the pathways relaying nociceptive input at the level of the spinal cord and brain.
The magnitude of resting EEG oscillations is sensitive to changes in brain network function, and some modulations of oscillation magnitude can relate to perceived pain intensity, variations in vigilance, and attentional states.
These oscillations can also be affected by analgesic drugs acting on the central nervous system.
For these reasons, IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 hypothesizes that EEG-derived measures can serve as biomarkers of target engagement of analgesic drugs for future Phase 1 clinical trials.
Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials could also benefit from these tools for patient stratification.
Trial registration This trial was registered 25/06/2019 in EudraCT (2019%2D%2D001204-37).

Related Results

Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract Introduction Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Tapentadol Versus Tramadol for Preemptive Analgesia in Elective Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Tapentadol Versus Tramadol for Preemptive Analgesia in Elective Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Effective control of postoperative pain is a critical component of perioperative care. Tramadol is commonly used for preemptive analgesia but is associated with variabl...
Comparative Pharmacology and Toxicology of Tramadol & Tapentadol
Comparative Pharmacology and Toxicology of Tramadol & Tapentadol
Pain is a common symptom in various health conditions and can significantly impact a person's quality of life if not managed properly. Although non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug...
Trends in dispensing and utilisation of sustained-release tapentadol in Australia.
Trends in dispensing and utilisation of sustained-release tapentadol in Australia.
ObjectivesTapentadol is a µ-opioid agonist, moderate noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (NRI) and very weak serotonin reuptake inhibitor. The sustained release (SR) formulation is in...
Role of Lacosamide in Diabetic Neuropathy: An Experience at Tertiary Care Hospital in Rural Sindh
Role of Lacosamide in Diabetic Neuropathy: An Experience at Tertiary Care Hospital in Rural Sindh
Background: Lacosamide is a relatively newer drug for treatment of chronic diabetic painful neuropathy (CDPN). Objective: To analyse the effectiveness and safety of lacosamide in p...

Back to Top