Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Transporting Heat Flux From the US and Europe to Antarctica Guided by Regional Seismic Structure
View through CrossRef
Subglacial geothermal heat flux affects the dynamics of the Antarctic ice sheet but is poorly known. We estimate heat flux across West Antarctica and the interior of East Antarctica by transporting heat flux observations from the contiguous US and Europe, based on seismic structure with a lateral resolution of about \qty{100}{km}. We transport with three Machine Learning models across a hierarchy of complexity (Linear Regression, Decision Tree, and Random Forest). We have validated the models within the US and Europe and cross-validated them between the two continents. The uppermost mantle shear wavespeed is the primary predictor. The geographical patterns can be reasonably reproduced but the variability tends to be underestimated. Antarctic heat flux estimates are highly consistent between the three Machine Learning models, but we report the Decision Tree results. In West and East Antarctica, respectively, we estimate subcontinental-scale heat flux values of $64\pm \hfu{7}$ (spatial mean $\pm$ standard deviation) and $53 \pm \hfu{3}$. Heat flux varies regionally across West Antarctica from \hfu{50} to \hfu{83} and across East Antarctica from \hfu{50} to \hfu{74}. Particularly high heat flux occurs in the western Transantarctic Mountains and Marie Byrd Land in West Antarctica and the lowest heat flux occurs in Victoria Land, the Wilkes Subglacial Basin, the Vostok Subglacial Highland, and south of Maud Subglacial Basin in East Antarctica. We estimate systematic errors including a constant shift in the continental average (\hfu{2.5}) and a variability (higher highs, lower lows) of $25\%$ from the continental average, along with an average random error of about \hfu{13} in West Antarctica and \hfu{10} in East Antarctica. Our estimates are consistent with a recent seismically-based study by \textcite{Shen_etal_2020} but are significantly lower in West Antarctica than a magnetically-based study by \textcite{Martos_etal_2017}. To resolve such inconsistencies, validation of all proxies against heat flux observations outside Antarctica is needed.
Title: Transporting Heat Flux From the US and Europe to Antarctica Guided by Regional Seismic Structure
Description:
Subglacial geothermal heat flux affects the dynamics of the Antarctic ice sheet but is poorly known.
We estimate heat flux across West Antarctica and the interior of East Antarctica by transporting heat flux observations from the contiguous US and Europe, based on seismic structure with a lateral resolution of about \qty{100}{km}.
We transport with three Machine Learning models across a hierarchy of complexity (Linear Regression, Decision Tree, and Random Forest).
We have validated the models within the US and Europe and cross-validated them between the two continents.
The uppermost mantle shear wavespeed is the primary predictor.
The geographical patterns can be reasonably reproduced but the variability tends to be underestimated.
Antarctic heat flux estimates are highly consistent between the three Machine Learning models, but we report the Decision Tree results.
In West and East Antarctica, respectively, we estimate subcontinental-scale heat flux values of $64\pm \hfu{7}$ (spatial mean $\pm$ standard deviation) and $53 \pm \hfu{3}$.
Heat flux varies regionally across West Antarctica from \hfu{50} to \hfu{83} and across East Antarctica from \hfu{50} to \hfu{74}.
Particularly high heat flux occurs in the western Transantarctic Mountains and Marie Byrd Land in West Antarctica and the lowest heat flux occurs in Victoria Land, the Wilkes Subglacial Basin, the Vostok Subglacial Highland, and south of Maud Subglacial Basin in East Antarctica.
We estimate systematic errors including a constant shift in the continental average (\hfu{2.
5}) and a variability (higher highs, lower lows) of $25\%$ from the continental average, along with an average random error of about \hfu{13} in West Antarctica and \hfu{10} in East Antarctica.
Our estimates are consistent with a recent seismically-based study by \textcite{Shen_etal_2020} but are significantly lower in West Antarctica than a magnetically-based study by \textcite{Martos_etal_2017}.
To resolve such inconsistencies, validation of all proxies against heat flux observations outside Antarctica is needed.
Related Results
JIT 2023 - Jornadas de Jóvenes Investigadores Tecnológicos
JIT 2023 - Jornadas de Jóvenes Investigadores Tecnológicos
Es un honor presentar este libro que compila los trabajos de investigación y desarrollo presentados en las Jornadas de Jóvenes Investigadores Tecnológicos (JIT) 2023. Este evento s...
Applying Machine Learning to Characterize and Transport the Relationship Between Seismic Structure and Surface Heat Flux
Applying Machine Learning to Characterize and Transport the Relationship Between Seismic Structure and Surface Heat Flux
Geothermal heat flux beneath the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets is an important boundary condition for ice sheet dynamics. Subglacial heat flux is rarely measured directly, so ...
Effect of ocean heat flux on Titan's topography and tectonic stresses
Effect of ocean heat flux on Titan's topography and tectonic stresses
INTRODUCTIONThe thermo-mechanical evolution of Titan's ice shell is primarily controlled by the mode of the heat transfer in the ice shell and the amount of heat coming from the oc...
Accurate calculation of Land Surface Heat Flux Based on Soil Observations over the Tibetan Plateau
Accurate calculation of Land Surface Heat Flux Based on Soil Observations over the Tibetan Plateau
The land surface heat flux is a crucial parameter that plays a significant role in the transformation and cycling of energy and matter between the atmospheric and land surface laye...
Seismic Frequency Enhancement for Mapping and Reservoir Characterization of Arab Formation: Case Study Onshore UAE
Seismic Frequency Enhancement for Mapping and Reservoir Characterization of Arab Formation: Case Study Onshore UAE
Abstract
Mapping and discrimination of Upper Jurassic Arab reservoirs (Arab A/B/C and D) in this 3D seismic onshore field of Abu Dhabi, is very sensitive to the seis...
4D Seismic on Gullfaks
4D Seismic on Gullfaks
SUMMARY
New technologies are rapidly emerging helping to obtain optimal drainage of large reservoirs. 4D seismic is such a reservoir monitoring technique. The phy...
Integrated Hydrocarbon Detection Based on Full Frequency Pre-Stack Seismic Inversion
Integrated Hydrocarbon Detection Based on Full Frequency Pre-Stack Seismic Inversion
Abstract
To improve the accuracy of hydrocarbon detection, seismic amplitude variation with offset (AVO), seismic amplitude variation with frequency (AVF), and direc...
Seismic Evaluation of Platform Cranes
Seismic Evaluation of Platform Cranes
ABSTRACT
Design of platforms in potentially seismic regions requires a thorough seismic analysis of both the platform and the equipment mounted to it. Typically, ...

