Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

ATTITUDE OF CLINICIANS TOWARDS CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING IN PROSTHODONTICS

View through CrossRef
Objective: To assess the attitude of resident and consultant Prosthodontists towards clinical decision-making in complete denture prosthodontics Study Design: A cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, from Nov 2019 to Jan 2020. Methodology: Fifty trainee and consultant prosthodontists from all over the country were included in the study. A questionnaire consisting of 10 questions aimed at assessing the approach towards clinical decision-making in complete denture prosthodontics was circulated among the study subjects using Google Forms. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 24. Results: Around 20 (40%) prosthodontists regarded patient’s personal values and preferences to be “very important” in clinical decision-making in contrast to their own values. Most of the clinicians 47 (94%) believed their patients were quite satisfied with them and around 31 (62%) prosthodontists believed that “choice of the best treatment results from negotiation between patients and clinicians after they have shared technical information as well as their values and preferences about the options”. No significant difference was observed in choice of response between males and females or between prosthodontists with varying clinical experience for any of the questions asked (p>0.05). Conclusion: Prosthodontists participating in the present study demonstrated a positive attitude towards shared decisionmaking in complete denture prosthodontics. No differences were observed between males and females in terms of attitude towards shared decision-making practices.
Title: ATTITUDE OF CLINICIANS TOWARDS CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING IN PROSTHODONTICS
Description:
Objective: To assess the attitude of resident and consultant Prosthodontists towards clinical decision-making in complete denture prosthodontics Study Design: A cross-sectional study.
Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, from Nov 2019 to Jan 2020.
Methodology: Fifty trainee and consultant prosthodontists from all over the country were included in the study.
A questionnaire consisting of 10 questions aimed at assessing the approach towards clinical decision-making in complete denture prosthodontics was circulated among the study subjects using Google Forms.
Data was analyzed using SPSS version 24.
Results: Around 20 (40%) prosthodontists regarded patient’s personal values and preferences to be “very important” in clinical decision-making in contrast to their own values.
Most of the clinicians 47 (94%) believed their patients were quite satisfied with them and around 31 (62%) prosthodontists believed that “choice of the best treatment results from negotiation between patients and clinicians after they have shared technical information as well as their values and preferences about the options”.
No significant difference was observed in choice of response between males and females or between prosthodontists with varying clinical experience for any of the questions asked (p>0.
05).
Conclusion: Prosthodontists participating in the present study demonstrated a positive attitude towards shared decisionmaking in complete denture prosthodontics.
No differences were observed between males and females in terms of attitude towards shared decision-making practices.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Proceedings of the Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine 2026 Conference - Selected Abstracts
Proceedings of the Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine 2026 Conference - Selected Abstracts
Welcome to this issue of Panorama of Emergency Medicine (POEM) dedicated to the 10th Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine (Q-PEM) International Conference which was organised and ho...
Diagnostic radiology and its future: what do clinicians need and think?
Diagnostic radiology and its future: what do clinicians need and think?
Abstract Objective To investigate the view of clinicians on diagnostic radiology and its future. Methods ...
Music therapists' decision-making in music together within therapy
Music therapists' decision-making in music together within therapy
Music therapy clinical decision-making for individual parent-dyads has been guided by clinical reflections and program descriptions. Some research in clinical decision-making has b...
Enhancing Clinicians’ Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Outpatient Care: Mixed Methods Study
Enhancing Clinicians’ Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Outpatient Care: Mixed Methods Study
Background Despite the increasing use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for collecting self-reported data among hospital outpatients, clinicians’ use of thes...
AI-infused patients for enhanced clinical simulation
AI-infused patients for enhanced clinical simulation
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the simulation of human intelligence in computers, allowing them to perform tasks that usually require human cognitive abilities, such as dec...
Clinical Decision Support Systems for Pressure Ulcer Management: Systematic Review (Preprint)
Clinical Decision Support Systems for Pressure Ulcer Management: Systematic Review (Preprint)
BACKGROUND The clinical decision-making process in pressure ulcer management is complex, and its quality depends on both the nurse's experience and the avai...

Back to Top