Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Isomorphism and Idealism

View through CrossRef
Abstract It is a common and perhaps natural view that the world itself has a structure which is isomorphic with the structure of language. One form of linguistic idealism holds that the world has this structure because language has it. This chapter argues that this belief in structural isomorphism derives from a certain view of the way in which the state of the world justifies the use of language. It argues that the view in question involves a commitment to a kind of Given, and is at least parallel to traditional appeals to the notion of the Given in epistemology. But, the chapter argues, it is also found in the most mundane, apparently innocent, conceptions of semantics and our understanding of language. Since the motivation for the view is epistemological, the belief in structural isomorphism is naturally understood in an idealist way. The chapter offers a sketch of a way of understanding how the state of the world justifies the use of language which does not lead either to structural isomorphism or to idealism.
Title: Isomorphism and Idealism
Description:
Abstract It is a common and perhaps natural view that the world itself has a structure which is isomorphic with the structure of language.
One form of linguistic idealism holds that the world has this structure because language has it.
This chapter argues that this belief in structural isomorphism derives from a certain view of the way in which the state of the world justifies the use of language.
It argues that the view in question involves a commitment to a kind of Given, and is at least parallel to traditional appeals to the notion of the Given in epistemology.
But, the chapter argues, it is also found in the most mundane, apparently innocent, conceptions of semantics and our understanding of language.
Since the motivation for the view is epistemological, the belief in structural isomorphism is naturally understood in an idealist way.
The chapter offers a sketch of a way of understanding how the state of the world justifies the use of language which does not lead either to structural isomorphism or to idealism.

Related Results

Isomorphism
Isomorphism
Abstract Isomorphism refers to the process whereby organizations become increasingly similar over time. There are two main approaches to understanding isomorphism: compet...
Yoruba Idealism
Yoruba Idealism
Yoruba Idealism questions, debates, and redefines the assumed epistemology in Yoruba idealism. It is a work in two parts. The first is built around a study of divinity–philosopher ...
Distinguishing between topological isomorphism and topological equivalence of power electronic converters
Distinguishing between topological isomorphism and topological equivalence of power electronic converters
In the process of deducing the topology of power electronic converters, scholars often use topological equivalence or topological isomorphism to identify topologies with different ...
Complex Pythagorean Neutrosophic Dombi Fuzzy Graph: Novel Investigations and Applications
Complex Pythagorean Neutrosophic Dombi Fuzzy Graph: Novel Investigations and Applications
The complex Pythagorean neutrosophic fuzzy graph (CPNFG) is a generalization of the Pythagorean neutrosophic fuzzy graph (PNFG), which extends the degree range from [0, 1] to a uni...
Representation, Alien Languages, and Linguistic Idealism
Representation, Alien Languages, and Linguistic Idealism
Abstract This chapter discusses the possibility of alien languages, and the implications of that issue for linguistic idealism, specifically as linguistic idealism c...
Conditions, Necessity, and Transcendental Linguistic Idealism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus
Conditions, Necessity, and Transcendental Linguistic Idealism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus
Abstract The question whether Wittgenstein’s Tractatus endorses a transcendental form of linguistic idealism is a highly complex one. This is so, not just because th...

Back to Top