Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Followership

View through CrossRef
Abstract Followership is a subtopic of leadership studies that represents the role of followers and following in the co-creation of the leadership/followership relation and outcomes. The focus on followership emerged with the shift in leadership research toward relational perspectives aimed at counteracting the predominant “leader-centric” bias that views leadership as initiated, directed, and largely controlled by leaders. Leader-centric approaches attribute outcomes to the differential influence and superior capabilities of leaders, with little to no recognition of the contribution of followers. They treat followers as passive participants who submit to the direction and goals of leaders. To counter this, followership perspectives view followers as active and essential participants in the co-creation of leadership/followership. Followership approaches argue that there is no leadership without followership: It is in the willingness of someone to follow or defer to another that leadership and followership are co-created. Followership is always present when leadership is occurring, and overlooking or disregarding it does not reduce or diminish its importance. Followership scholars draw attention to the necessary presence of followership by repositioning leadership and followership into a joint construct in which leadership and followership are two sides of the same coin. In this relation, leadership is the study of the agency, behaviors, identity, and characteristics of leaders in the co-creation process, and followership is the study of the agency, behaviors, identity, and characteristics of followers in the co-creation. Followership is formally defined as followers’ agency, position, identity, characteristics, and behavioral choices in the co-creation of leadership/followership. It can occur in formal relations, such as those seen in hierarchical organizations (i.e., manager–subordinate relations), or it can be seen in informal relations, where individuals choose who will lead and who will follow. Topics addressed in followership research include things such as the nature or style of those who are more or less effective at following or being a follower; what it is like to be in a state or condition of followership; and the characteristics, experiences, or factors associated with holding a followership position. In all cases, followership is fluid and affected by myriad factors such that having the role of follower does not mean that the individual only follows. In many cases, the best followership occurs when followers work in coordination with leaders to support the leader’s role and help attain the leader’s goals.
Title: Followership
Description:
Abstract Followership is a subtopic of leadership studies that represents the role of followers and following in the co-creation of the leadership/followership relation and outcomes.
The focus on followership emerged with the shift in leadership research toward relational perspectives aimed at counteracting the predominant “leader-centric” bias that views leadership as initiated, directed, and largely controlled by leaders.
Leader-centric approaches attribute outcomes to the differential influence and superior capabilities of leaders, with little to no recognition of the contribution of followers.
They treat followers as passive participants who submit to the direction and goals of leaders.
To counter this, followership perspectives view followers as active and essential participants in the co-creation of leadership/followership.
Followership approaches argue that there is no leadership without followership: It is in the willingness of someone to follow or defer to another that leadership and followership are co-created.
Followership is always present when leadership is occurring, and overlooking or disregarding it does not reduce or diminish its importance.
Followership scholars draw attention to the necessary presence of followership by repositioning leadership and followership into a joint construct in which leadership and followership are two sides of the same coin.
In this relation, leadership is the study of the agency, behaviors, identity, and characteristics of leaders in the co-creation process, and followership is the study of the agency, behaviors, identity, and characteristics of followers in the co-creation.
Followership is formally defined as followers’ agency, position, identity, characteristics, and behavioral choices in the co-creation of leadership/followership.
It can occur in formal relations, such as those seen in hierarchical organizations (i.
e.
, manager–subordinate relations), or it can be seen in informal relations, where individuals choose who will lead and who will follow.
Topics addressed in followership research include things such as the nature or style of those who are more or less effective at following or being a follower; what it is like to be in a state or condition of followership; and the characteristics, experiences, or factors associated with holding a followership position.
In all cases, followership is fluid and affected by myriad factors such that having the role of follower does not mean that the individual only follows.
In many cases, the best followership occurs when followers work in coordination with leaders to support the leader’s role and help attain the leader’s goals.

Related Results

Followership in health care clinicians: a scoping review
Followership in health care clinicians: a scoping review
Objective: The objective of this scoping review was to identify and map the existing literature on the current state of followership research in relation to health care...
Followership in Business Transformation: Hyundai Motor Group Case
Followership in Business Transformation: Hyundai Motor Group Case
This study explored the employees’ perception of followership and its evolution in business transformation, given the case of the Hyundai Motor Group (HMG). Using a case study appr...
Followership
Followership
Abstract Followership is defined as the beliefs, characteristics, and behaviors that followers bring to the leadership relationship and how they affect leadership and org...
Linking leadership and followership styles
Linking leadership and followership styles
Purpose This study proposes a theoretical model linking leadership and followership styles. Design/methodology/approach A new instrument was developed and tested on 271 respondent...
An Empirical Study on the Integrated Model of Followership and Leadership Styles in Japan
An Empirical Study on the Integrated Model of Followership and Leadership Styles in Japan
This study explores an integrated model of followership and leadership styles that functions optimally. Utilizing Kelley’s (1992) model of followership and Hersey and Blanchard’s (...
Effect of Ethical Leadership on Followership Dimension
Effect of Ethical Leadership on Followership Dimension
Ethical leadership behavior has positive influences on followership dimensions. This study aimed at investigating the relationship Ethical leadership and followership dimensions. T...
Followership in health care clinicians: a scoping review protocol
Followership in health care clinicians: a scoping review protocol
ABSTRACT Objective: The main objective of this scoping review is to identify and map followership literature in order to understand the current s...
Followership in complex trauma
Followership in complex trauma
Recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have highlighted the importance of human factors in complex trauma management. A reorganisation of trauma services in England has led to th...

Back to Top