Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Attentional bias of guilty and innocent participants in a concealed information test

View through CrossRef
We examined the attentional bias between guilt and innocence in a concealed information test using a dot-probe task. The participants were 20 individuals in a guilty group, who were told they had committed a crime, 21 individuals in an innocent group, who were told they had not committed a crime, and 19 individuals in an informed-innocent group, who were told they had not committed a crime but who were given crime-relevant information. Participants in the guilty group were instructed to try to deceive the examiner so that their crime would not be detected, whereas those in the 2 innocent groups were told to be open and frank. The avoidance response of the guilty group was much stronger than that of the 2 innocent groups at an exposure duration of 1,250 ms. We also confirmed that a group not involved in a criminal act, but with crime-relevant information, could be distinguished effectively at an exposure duration of 1,250 ms. Thus, it is possible to distinguish between not only the guilty versus innocent group, but also the guilty group versus the innocent group with crime-related information.
Title: Attentional bias of guilty and innocent participants in a concealed information test
Description:
We examined the attentional bias between guilt and innocence in a concealed information test using a dot-probe task.
The participants were 20 individuals in a guilty group, who were told they had committed a crime, 21 individuals in an innocent group, who were told they had not committed a crime, and 19 individuals in an informed-innocent group, who were told they had not committed a crime but who were given crime-relevant information.
Participants in the guilty group were instructed to try to deceive the examiner so that their crime would not be detected, whereas those in the 2 innocent groups were told to be open and frank.
The avoidance response of the guilty group was much stronger than that of the 2 innocent groups at an exposure duration of 1,250 ms.
We also confirmed that a group not involved in a criminal act, but with crime-relevant information, could be distinguished effectively at an exposure duration of 1,250 ms.
Thus, it is possible to distinguish between not only the guilty versus innocent group, but also the guilty group versus the innocent group with crime-related information.

Related Results

Lateralization of visuospatial attention
Lateralization of visuospatial attention
Background: Lateralization of visuospatial attention, referred as pseudoneglect manifests as a mostly leftward attentional bias in healthy people, and is stablished by the laterali...
Combining recognition, conflict-monitoring and feedback-related ERPs to detect concealed autobiographical information
Combining recognition, conflict-monitoring and feedback-related ERPs to detect concealed autobiographical information
This study examined neural signatures associated conflict-monitoring, recognition and feedback processing in a novel feedback Concealed Information Test (fCIT), and also examined w...
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of conditions caused by the compression of the neurovascular bundle within the thoracic outlet. It is classified into three main ...
Cognitive bias and stuttering in adolescence
Cognitive bias and stuttering in adolescence
<p>Purpose: The tendency to prioritize negative or threatening social information, a cognitive process known as cognitive bias, has been linked to the development of social a...
Frame of reference influences the attentional allocation in space
Frame of reference influences the attentional allocation in space
Attentional allocation in space is proved to be influenced by objects, showing a more efficient attentional shifting within an object compared to between objects, which is called a...
Human Dignity and the Innocent Agent&nbsp;
Human Dignity and the Innocent Agent&nbsp;
Courts and commentators do not differentiate between defendants who perpetrate crimes by means of inanimate weapons or trained animals and those who perpetrate crimes by means of o...
Neural mechanisms underlying anxiety-related deficits of attentional inhibition: direct ERP evidence from the Pd component
Neural mechanisms underlying anxiety-related deficits of attentional inhibition: direct ERP evidence from the Pd component
Abstract Behavioral evidence shows that anxious individuals tend to be distracted by irrelevant stimulation not only for threat-related stimuli but also for non-emo...
Prevalence of concealed arrhythmogenic substrate for sudden cardiac arrest in the general population
Prevalence of concealed arrhythmogenic substrate for sudden cardiac arrest in the general population
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): US Na...

Back to Top