Reduction of Driveline Infections Through Doubled Driveline Tunneling of Left Ventricular Assist Devices

AbstractThe durability of ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy improved steadily over the past years. However, driveline infections remain a challenge. To test whether an improved surgical implantation technique may lower the incidence of infections, we analyzed all patients receiving a VAD implantation in the years 2008 and 2009 (group 1) and compared them with all patients who received a VAD in 2011 (group 2) after we changed our implantation method. The new technique involves tunneling of the driveline into the fascia of the musculus rectus abdominis, resulting in a longer, intrafascial run to achieve a better resistance against ascending infections. We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients in group 1 and 41 patients in group 2. One year after implantation, the infection rate was markedly reduced (22.5% [n = 9] group 1 vs. 4.9% [n = 2] group 2, P < 0.001) by the new implantation method. There was, however, no significant improvement in overall mortality. The Cox regression model identified the implantation method as an independent risk factor for 1 year after implantation driveline infection (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the new tunneling technique marks a great leap forward in long‐term VAD treatment. However, overall mortality remains high and needs further improvement.