Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Respite in Dementia: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis

View through CrossRef
Aim There is a lack of conceptual clarity around ‘respite’ as it relates to people with dementia and their carers. This study provides clarification on the use and meaning of the term and considers the concept in relation to the dominant care paradigm in dementia, i.e. person-centred care. Methods Rodgers’ (1989) evolutionary framework was employed. A systematic search was conducted on the Pubmed/MedLine, Embase, Cinahl, PsychInfo, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane databases (1980–2016, English) with fixed search terms relating to ‘respite’ and ‘dementia’. Papers with primary qualitative data and literature reviews were included. This search was supplemented with snowballing techniques (back/forward searching, generic search engines). Data were analysed thematically, through an iterative process of constant comparison. Results Respite is understood both as a service that provides a physical break for the carer and as a psychological outcome, i.e. a mental break for the carer, which can be facilitated by formal services, under certain conditions. The conceptual model outlines how client factors (dyadic relations, recognising/accepting need, carer psychosocial issues, restorative occupation, and stigma) and service factors (model/characteristics, care quality, staff expertise, meaningful occupation for people with dementia and communication and support), interact to influence a respite outcome. The key antecedent for a positive respite experience is that the carer perceives that mutual benefit is garnered from service use. Conclusion The term respite can be interpreted as both a service and an outcome. However, it is clear that ‘respite’, as currently understood, acknowledges the relational experience of the carer only; it is, therefore, potentially damaging to the planning and delivery of person-centred dementia care. We suggest ‘restorative care’ as a potential alternative nomenclature to respite care, thereby highlighting the importance of providing mutual, personalised health and social care services that serve to enhance care relationships rather than diminish them.
Title: Respite in Dementia: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis
Description:
Aim There is a lack of conceptual clarity around ‘respite’ as it relates to people with dementia and their carers.
This study provides clarification on the use and meaning of the term and considers the concept in relation to the dominant care paradigm in dementia, i.
e.
person-centred care.
Methods Rodgers’ (1989) evolutionary framework was employed.
A systematic search was conducted on the Pubmed/MedLine, Embase, Cinahl, PsychInfo, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane databases (1980–2016, English) with fixed search terms relating to ‘respite’ and ‘dementia’.
Papers with primary qualitative data and literature reviews were included.
This search was supplemented with snowballing techniques (back/forward searching, generic search engines).
Data were analysed thematically, through an iterative process of constant comparison.
Results Respite is understood both as a service that provides a physical break for the carer and as a psychological outcome, i.
e.
a mental break for the carer, which can be facilitated by formal services, under certain conditions.
The conceptual model outlines how client factors (dyadic relations, recognising/accepting need, carer psychosocial issues, restorative occupation, and stigma) and service factors (model/characteristics, care quality, staff expertise, meaningful occupation for people with dementia and communication and support), interact to influence a respite outcome.
The key antecedent for a positive respite experience is that the carer perceives that mutual benefit is garnered from service use.
Conclusion The term respite can be interpreted as both a service and an outcome.
However, it is clear that ‘respite’, as currently understood, acknowledges the relational experience of the carer only; it is, therefore, potentially damaging to the planning and delivery of person-centred dementia care.
We suggest ‘restorative care’ as a potential alternative nomenclature to respite care, thereby highlighting the importance of providing mutual, personalised health and social care services that serve to enhance care relationships rather than diminish them.

Related Results

Prescription Patterns of Anti-dementia and Psychotropic Drugs in People Living With Dementia in China
Prescription Patterns of Anti-dementia and Psychotropic Drugs in People Living With Dementia in China
Abstract Pharmacotherapy of dementia is a critical intervention for managing symptoms of and slowing progression of dementia. However, evidence on prescribing patter...
ENGAGE-DEM : a model of engagement of people with dementia
ENGAGE-DEM : a model of engagement of people with dementia
Dementia is a neurodegenerative disease that affects cognition, producing a reduction in thinking, problem-solving, and mnemonic abilities, functioning, preventing affected people ...
MBI‐apathy, ApoEɛ2, and risk for Alzheimer disease dementia
MBI‐apathy, ApoEɛ2, and risk for Alzheimer disease dementia
AbstractBackgroundApathy, characterized by decreased interest, initiative, and emotional reactivity, is amongst the most common neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia. However, apat...
Preeclampsia – A risk factor for dementia in women
Preeclampsia – A risk factor for dementia in women
Dear Editor, Dementia is a broad term that includes a spectrum of diseases that affect our cognition, thinking ability, and performance of daily activities. According to the World ...
Prevalence, Factors Associated and Knowledge of Dementia in a Sample of Older Ugandans
Prevalence, Factors Associated and Knowledge of Dementia in a Sample of Older Ugandans
Abstract Introduction:Dementia is on the rise due to increasing proportion of old people in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Although dementia is misattributed to normal ageing or...

Back to Top