Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Clinical Outcomes of Patellofemoral Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation: A Prospective Analysis

View through CrossRef
Objectives: The use of osteochondral allograft transplantation (OAG) for chondral defects of the knee is increasing, particularly for defects involving the femoral condyles. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes for patients undergoing patellofemoral OAG for symptomatic chondral lesions. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing OAG for full-thickness patella and trochlear lesions between 2007 and 2014 by two senior surgeons were analyzed. Pre- and post-operative patient reported outcomes scores were collected, with a minimum 21-month follow-up. Patient demographics, preoperative clinical data including information on prior ipsilateral knee surgeries, and intraoperative details were analyzed for all patients. Complications, reoperations, and conversion to total knee or patellofemoral arthroplasty were recorded. Statistical analysis was conducted with student’s T-tests, with P<0.05 considered significant. Results: A total of 14 patients (10 females, 4 males) with an average age of 32.8±7.5 years (range, 20-48) were identified for inclusion with an average follow-up of 3.6±1.8 years (range, 1.8-7.8) (Table 1). The average body mass index was 27.5±6.9 kg/m 2 . Patients experienced an average 5.4±4.2 years of symptoms prior to OAG and 100% of patients had undergone previous ipsilateral knee surgery with an average 4.1±3.5 prior procedures before undergoing patellofemoral OAG. The average defect size on the patella was 855mm 2 while that on the trochlea was 322mm 2 . At the time of OAG, 6 (43%) patients received trochlear grafts, 6 (43%) received patellar grafts, and 2 (14%) received bipolar grafts. Nine patients (64%) received a single allograft, 3 (21%) received 2 allografts to 2 separate lesions, and 2 (14%) received grafts to 4 separate lesions. At final follow-up, there were significant improvements in Lysholm, IKDC, KOOS, WOMAC, and SF-12 Physical outcomes scores; no significant improvements were found in the SF-12 Mental subscale (Figure 1). Two patients (both female, ages 27 and 41) were considered failures as they had converted to knee arthroplasty at an average 2.7 years following OAG. Both of these patients had received allografts to the patella with lesion sizes of 506mm 2 and 1800mm 2 , respectively. Conclusion: Osteochondral allograft transplantation of the patellofemoral joint can be considered a viable restoration procedure for patients with symptomatic chondral lesions to the trochlea and patella. At an average follow-up of 3.6 years, the majority of patients will experience significant improvements in nearly all outcomes scores, with an arthroplasty conversion rate of 14%. Additional information on this difficult-to-treat patient population, including a better understanding of risk factors for failure, prognostic factors for success, and long-term outcomes, is needed. [Table: see text]
Title: Clinical Outcomes of Patellofemoral Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation: A Prospective Analysis
Description:
Objectives: The use of osteochondral allograft transplantation (OAG) for chondral defects of the knee is increasing, particularly for defects involving the femoral condyles.
The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes for patients undergoing patellofemoral OAG for symptomatic chondral lesions.
Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing OAG for full-thickness patella and trochlear lesions between 2007 and 2014 by two senior surgeons were analyzed.
Pre- and post-operative patient reported outcomes scores were collected, with a minimum 21-month follow-up.
Patient demographics, preoperative clinical data including information on prior ipsilateral knee surgeries, and intraoperative details were analyzed for all patients.
Complications, reoperations, and conversion to total knee or patellofemoral arthroplasty were recorded.
Statistical analysis was conducted with student’s T-tests, with P<0.
05 considered significant.
Results: A total of 14 patients (10 females, 4 males) with an average age of 32.
8±7.
5 years (range, 20-48) were identified for inclusion with an average follow-up of 3.
6±1.
8 years (range, 1.
8-7.
8) (Table 1).
The average body mass index was 27.
5±6.
9 kg/m 2 .
Patients experienced an average 5.
4±4.
2 years of symptoms prior to OAG and 100% of patients had undergone previous ipsilateral knee surgery with an average 4.
1±3.
5 prior procedures before undergoing patellofemoral OAG.
The average defect size on the patella was 855mm 2 while that on the trochlea was 322mm 2 .
At the time of OAG, 6 (43%) patients received trochlear grafts, 6 (43%) received patellar grafts, and 2 (14%) received bipolar grafts.
Nine patients (64%) received a single allograft, 3 (21%) received 2 allografts to 2 separate lesions, and 2 (14%) received grafts to 4 separate lesions.
At final follow-up, there were significant improvements in Lysholm, IKDC, KOOS, WOMAC, and SF-12 Physical outcomes scores; no significant improvements were found in the SF-12 Mental subscale (Figure 1).
Two patients (both female, ages 27 and 41) were considered failures as they had converted to knee arthroplasty at an average 2.
7 years following OAG.
Both of these patients had received allografts to the patella with lesion sizes of 506mm 2 and 1800mm 2 , respectively.
Conclusion: Osteochondral allograft transplantation of the patellofemoral joint can be considered a viable restoration procedure for patients with symptomatic chondral lesions to the trochlea and patella.
At an average follow-up of 3.
6 years, the majority of patients will experience significant improvements in nearly all outcomes scores, with an arthroplasty conversion rate of 14%.
Additional information on this difficult-to-treat patient population, including a better understanding of risk factors for failure, prognostic factors for success, and long-term outcomes, is needed.
[Table: see text].

Related Results

Robot-Assisted Patellofemoral Arthroplasty
Robot-Assisted Patellofemoral Arthroplasty
Background: Patellofemoral arthroplasty is indicated in patients with isolated patellofemoral arthritis in whom nonoperative treatment has failed ...
Medial and Lateral Patellofemoral Joint Retinaculum Thickness in People With Patellofemoral Pain: A Case‐Control Study
Medial and Lateral Patellofemoral Joint Retinaculum Thickness in People With Patellofemoral Pain: A Case‐Control Study
ObjectivesTo measure the medial and lateral retinaculum thickness in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain using ultrasound and to assess associations with the symptom d...
Influence of Patella Thickness on Patellofemoral Pressure in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Influence of Patella Thickness on Patellofemoral Pressure in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Abstract Background: Patellofemoral complications are one of the major issues after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Excessive patellofemoral joint pressure is associated wit...
PB1673 FEASIBILITY AND OUTCOME OF ALLOGENEIC BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION IN ADULT PHI NEGATIVE ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA
PB1673 FEASIBILITY AND OUTCOME OF ALLOGENEIC BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION IN ADULT PHI NEGATIVE ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA
Background:Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a rare disease in adults. Despite the novels therapies, clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. Bone marrow allograft still holds ...
Autograft Versus Allograft in Pediatric Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
Autograft Versus Allograft in Pediatric Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
Background: Patellofemoral instability (PFI) is common in pediatric athletes, with up to 40% developing recurrent instability. Medial patellofemoral ligament (M...
Allograft nephrectomy vs. no‐allograft nephrectomy for renal transplantation: a meta‐analysis
Allograft nephrectomy vs. no‐allograft nephrectomy for renal transplantation: a meta‐analysis
AbstractObjectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of allograft nephrectomy vs. no‐allograft nephrectomy for renal re‐transplantation.MethodsMedline (PubMed), Embase, Ovid, Cochran...

Back to Top