Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor preferences in rats
View through CrossRef
Prior work indicates that glucose and fructose differ in their postingestive reinforcing effects. The present study investigated this phenomenon by training rats to associate the intake of flavored water with intragastric (IG) infusions of 16% sugar solutions. In experiment 1, rats had one flavor [conditional stimulus (CS)] paired with IG sugar infusions (CS+; e.g., cherry) and another flavor paired with IG water (CS-; e.g., grape) 23 h/day; Chow was available ad libitum. In subsequent choice tests, rats infused with glucose displayed a strong preference (89%) for the CS+ flavor, whereas rats infused with fructose showed only a small and nonreliable CS+ flavor preference (62%). When next trained to associate one flavor (e.g., orange) with IG glucose and another flavor (e.g., strawberry) with IG fructose, rats in both groups developed a significant preference (81%) for the glucose-paired flavor. In experiment 2, food-deprived rats were trained 2 h/day to associate a CS+ flavor with IG sugar and a CS- flavor with IG water infusions. The glucose-reinforced rats displayed a near-total preference (95%) for the CS+ flavor, whereas fructose-reinforced rats showed a much smaller CS+ preference (67%). The preference findings indicate that the postingestive consequences of glucose are much more reinforcing than those of fructose. It appears that food conditioning is mediated by chemospecific actions of nutrients rather than their general satiating or energy repleting effects.
American Physiological Society
Title: Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor preferences in rats
Description:
Prior work indicates that glucose and fructose differ in their postingestive reinforcing effects.
The present study investigated this phenomenon by training rats to associate the intake of flavored water with intragastric (IG) infusions of 16% sugar solutions.
In experiment 1, rats had one flavor [conditional stimulus (CS)] paired with IG sugar infusions (CS+; e.
g.
, cherry) and another flavor paired with IG water (CS-; e.
g.
, grape) 23 h/day; Chow was available ad libitum.
In subsequent choice tests, rats infused with glucose displayed a strong preference (89%) for the CS+ flavor, whereas rats infused with fructose showed only a small and nonreliable CS+ flavor preference (62%).
When next trained to associate one flavor (e.
g.
, orange) with IG glucose and another flavor (e.
g.
, strawberry) with IG fructose, rats in both groups developed a significant preference (81%) for the glucose-paired flavor.
In experiment 2, food-deprived rats were trained 2 h/day to associate a CS+ flavor with IG sugar and a CS- flavor with IG water infusions.
The glucose-reinforced rats displayed a near-total preference (95%) for the CS+ flavor, whereas fructose-reinforced rats showed a much smaller CS+ preference (67%).
The preference findings indicate that the postingestive consequences of glucose are much more reinforcing than those of fructose.
It appears that food conditioning is mediated by chemospecific actions of nutrients rather than their general satiating or energy repleting effects.
Related Results
Metabolic Effects of Fructose and the Worldwide Increase in Obesity
Metabolic Effects of Fructose and the Worldwide Increase in Obesity
While virtually absent in our diet a few hundred years ago, fructose has now become a major constituent of our modern diet. Our main sources of fructose are sucrose from beet or ca...
Fructose Amplifies Counterregulatory Responses to Hypoglycemia in Humans
Fructose Amplifies Counterregulatory Responses to Hypoglycemia in Humans
Glucokinase (GK) is required for cellular glucose sensing, although there is a paucity of data regarding its role in the counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia in humans. Becau...
Data from Dietary Fructose Promotes Prostate Cancer Growth
Data from Dietary Fructose Promotes Prostate Cancer Growth
<div>Abstract<p>Clinical localization of primary tumors and sites of metastasis by PET is based on the enhanced cellular uptake of 2-deoxy-2-[<sup>18</sup>F...
Pregnancy and Challenging Transient Anti-GAD65 Positivity: A Case Report with Literature Review
Pregnancy and Challenging Transient Anti-GAD65 Positivity: A Case Report with Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
During pregnancy, women may develop blood glucose abnormalities like gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or, rarely, type 1 diabetes (T1D), which can lead to ...
Fructose Normalizes Specific Counterregulatory Responses to Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
Fructose Normalizes Specific Counterregulatory Responses to Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
We have previously reported that specific counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia were augmented by an infusion of fructose in nondiabetic humans. We hypothesized that this eff...
Fructose Consumption, Lipogenesis, and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Fructose Consumption, Lipogenesis, and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Increased fructose consumption has been suggested to contribute to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance, but a causal role of fructose in...
Synergistic Effects of Naringenin and Metformin on Dyslipidemia and Glucose Regulation in High Fructose-Fed Rats
Synergistic Effects of Naringenin and Metformin on Dyslipidemia and Glucose Regulation in High Fructose-Fed Rats
Background:
Excessive intake of fructose can lead to insulin resistance (IR). Metformin is commonly used as a first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes, and naringenin, ...
Fructose Malabsorption: How Much Fructose Can a Healthy Subject Tolerate?
Fructose Malabsorption: How Much Fructose Can a Healthy Subject Tolerate?
Background/Aims: In a prospective study, we evaluated fructose absorption capacity in 17 healthy female volunteers aged 16–27 years. Methods: All volunteers underwent analysis of t...

