Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison of hemodynamic alterations and post-operative profile of sevoflurane and propofol during laparoscopic cholecystectomies
View through CrossRef
Background: Modern laparoscopic surgeries with insufflation of gas into peritoneal cavity are gold standard treatment for cholelithiasis. Propofol, a GABA receptor positive allosteric modulator and Sevoflurane, an inhalational anesthetic are used for maintenance of general anesthesia. In laparoscopy, significant hemodynamic changes occur. Searching in field of anesthesia is going on for anesthetic agent for better recovery.
Aims and Objectives: Objective of the study is to compare sevoflurane with propofol for intraoperative hemodynamic changes and post-operative recovery profile of patient’s undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomies under general anesthesia. Secondary objective is to compare post-operative complications.
Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, and comparative study done after permission from the institutional ethical committee and informed consent from patients. Total 84 patients of 20–50 years age of either sex were scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, divided in two equal groups – Group P, induced with propofol and anesthesia was maintained with propofol (100–120 μg/kg/min), nitrous oxide and oxygen and Group S induced with propofol and anesthesia was maintained using sevoflurane (1–2%), nitrous oxide, and oxygen.
Results: We found that time for eye opening was 9±1.21 min in Group P and 8±1.34 min in Group S. Time for following verbal command was 10±1.20 min in Group P and 9±1.32 min in Group S. Time for speaking name by patient was 11±1.20 min in Group P and 10±1.34 min in Group S. Difference between two groups regarding eye opening, following verbal command, and time to speak own name are highly significant with P<0.001 which proves that eye opening, following verbal command and time for speaking name by patient were significantly shorter in sevoflurane group. Time to achieve modified aldrete score >8 was 14±1.30 min in Group P and 13±1.37 min in Group S. Difference between two groups is also highly significant with P<0.001 which proves that time to achieve modified aldrete score>8 were significantly shorter in sevoflurane group.
Conclusion: From our study, maintenance of general anesthesia with sevoflurane is associated with faster recovery from anesthesia.
Pharmamedix India Publication Pvt Ltd
Title: Comparison of hemodynamic alterations and post-operative profile of sevoflurane and propofol during laparoscopic cholecystectomies
Description:
Background: Modern laparoscopic surgeries with insufflation of gas into peritoneal cavity are gold standard treatment for cholelithiasis.
Propofol, a GABA receptor positive allosteric modulator and Sevoflurane, an inhalational anesthetic are used for maintenance of general anesthesia.
In laparoscopy, significant hemodynamic changes occur.
Searching in field of anesthesia is going on for anesthetic agent for better recovery.
Aims and Objectives: Objective of the study is to compare sevoflurane with propofol for intraoperative hemodynamic changes and post-operative recovery profile of patient’s undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomies under general anesthesia.
Secondary objective is to compare post-operative complications.
Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, and comparative study done after permission from the institutional ethical committee and informed consent from patients.
Total 84 patients of 20–50 years age of either sex were scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, divided in two equal groups – Group P, induced with propofol and anesthesia was maintained with propofol (100–120 μg/kg/min), nitrous oxide and oxygen and Group S induced with propofol and anesthesia was maintained using sevoflurane (1–2%), nitrous oxide, and oxygen.
Results: We found that time for eye opening was 9±1.
21 min in Group P and 8±1.
34 min in Group S.
Time for following verbal command was 10±1.
20 min in Group P and 9±1.
32 min in Group S.
Time for speaking name by patient was 11±1.
20 min in Group P and 10±1.
34 min in Group S.
Difference between two groups regarding eye opening, following verbal command, and time to speak own name are highly significant with P<0.
001 which proves that eye opening, following verbal command and time for speaking name by patient were significantly shorter in sevoflurane group.
Time to achieve modified aldrete score >8 was 14±1.
30 min in Group P and 13±1.
37 min in Group S.
Difference between two groups is also highly significant with P<0.
001 which proves that time to achieve modified aldrete score>8 were significantly shorter in sevoflurane group.
Conclusion: From our study, maintenance of general anesthesia with sevoflurane is associated with faster recovery from anesthesia.
Related Results
Comparison of different induction techniques on hemodynamic changes in pediatric patients undergoing infra umbilical surgeries using laryngeal mask airway
Comparison of different induction techniques on hemodynamic changes in pediatric patients undergoing infra umbilical surgeries using laryngeal mask airway
Background: Post-induction hypotension associated with various agents is well-known in adults undergoing general anesthesia for various procedures. However, this phenomenon has not...
Comparison of Sevoflurane and Propofol for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion in Adults
Comparison of Sevoflurane and Propofol for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion in Adults
Background: A randomized comparative study titled “Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol for insertion of laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults.” was done on 50 patients in th...
Comparison of Propofol and Sevoflurane for Insertion of LMA in Children
Comparison of Propofol and Sevoflurane for Insertion of LMA in Children
Propofol is a drug of choice for induction of laryngeal mask airway insertion due to its ability to depress oropharyngeal and cough reflexes. Sevoflurane is a no pungent inhalation...
Recovery profile and discharge following day case laparoscopic gynaecological surgeries: use of sevoflurane anaesthesia vs propofol
Recovery profile and discharge following day case laparoscopic gynaecological surgeries: use of sevoflurane anaesthesia vs propofol
Context: Rapid emergence and early recovery from anaesthesia with minimal complications are desirable. Both propofol and sevoflurane meet the above needs and are established as age...
The Effects of Sevoflurane versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Emergence Agitation after Interventional Neuroradiology: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
The Effects of Sevoflurane versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Emergence Agitation after Interventional Neuroradiology: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Interventional neuroradiology (INR) is a minimally invasive procedure that is often performed under general anesthesia. A potential complication, emergence agitation (E...
<b>Comparative Assessment of Propofol and Sevoflurane for Insertion of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Children</b>
<b>Comparative Assessment of Propofol and Sevoflurane for Insertion of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Children</b>
Background: Optimal insertion conditions for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) are essential in pediatric anesthesia to reduce repeated attempts and airway reflex–mediated complications,...
Comparing Propofol and Sevoflurane for Faster Recovery in Pediatrics
Comparing Propofol and Sevoflurane for Faster Recovery in Pediatrics
Background: Pediatric anesthesia demands agents that ensure swift recovery with minimal complications; however, the comparative effectiveness of propofol and sevoflurane for rapid ...
The Effects of Sevoflurane Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Emergence Agitation After Interventional Neuroradiology: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
The Effects of Sevoflurane Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Emergence Agitation After Interventional Neuroradiology: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Background
Interventional neuroradiology (INR) is a minimally invasive procedure that is often performed under general anesthesia. A potential complication, eme...

