Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Periodontium and restoration
View through CrossRef
Background:
Restorations have been known to have a detrimental effect on the periodontium with certain teeth or groups of teeth prone to develop more severe periodontal destruction. This study compared the periodontal health of restored molars with that of unrestored molars and determined the correlation between the type, age, and status of the restorations on the molars and the health of the associated periodontium.
Materials and Methods:
Patients with at least one restored molar and its contralateral counterpart of one unrestored molar were recruited for the study. The type of restoration and material, age of restoration, and type of defects on the restoration were noted in the restored group, while the degree of tooth mobility, furcation involvement, gingival recession, gingival status, and periodontal pockets depth were measured in all teeth studied. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 21.0.
Results:
A total of 160 molars (80 restored and 80 unrestored molars) were studied. There were more restored mandibular molars (53.7%) than restored maxillary molars (46.3%). More first molars (43) compared to second molars (37) were restored. The most prevalent type of restoration was amalgam restoration (67.5%), followed by glass ionomer cement restoration (10%). There was no statistically significant association between the type of restoration and the periodontal clinical parameters assessed (P > 0.05). Similarly, there was no statistically significant association between the class of the restoration whether Class I or II and the periodontal clinical parameters assessed. The restored molars had 3.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5–32.8) times the odds of bleeding on probing, 1.5 (95% CI 0.2–8.9) times the odds of having Grade 1 mobility, 2.1 (95% CI 0.5–10.0) times the odds of having Grade 1 gingival recession, and 1.5 (95% CI 0.3–9.2) times the odds of having Grade 1 furcation involvement than the unrestored.
Conclusion:
It can be concluded that there is no statistically significant difference in the health of the periodontium of restored and unrestored molars or correlation between the type, age, and status of the restorations on the molars and their periodontal health. The odds of having bleeding on probing, tooth mobility, gingival recession, and furcation involvement tends to be higher with the restoration of the molars.
Title: Periodontium and restoration
Description:
Background:
Restorations have been known to have a detrimental effect on the periodontium with certain teeth or groups of teeth prone to develop more severe periodontal destruction.
This study compared the periodontal health of restored molars with that of unrestored molars and determined the correlation between the type, age, and status of the restorations on the molars and the health of the associated periodontium.
Materials and Methods:
Patients with at least one restored molar and its contralateral counterpart of one unrestored molar were recruited for the study.
The type of restoration and material, age of restoration, and type of defects on the restoration were noted in the restored group, while the degree of tooth mobility, furcation involvement, gingival recession, gingival status, and periodontal pockets depth were measured in all teeth studied.
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 21.
Results:
A total of 160 molars (80 restored and 80 unrestored molars) were studied.
There were more restored mandibular molars (53.
7%) than restored maxillary molars (46.
3%).
More first molars (43) compared to second molars (37) were restored.
The most prevalent type of restoration was amalgam restoration (67.
5%), followed by glass ionomer cement restoration (10%).
There was no statistically significant association between the type of restoration and the periodontal clinical parameters assessed (P > 0.
05).
Similarly, there was no statistically significant association between the class of the restoration whether Class I or II and the periodontal clinical parameters assessed.
The restored molars had 3.
2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.
5–32.
8) times the odds of bleeding on probing, 1.
5 (95% CI 0.
2–8.
9) times the odds of having Grade 1 mobility, 2.
1 (95% CI 0.
5–10.
0) times the odds of having Grade 1 gingival recession, and 1.
5 (95% CI 0.
3–9.
2) times the odds of having Grade 1 furcation involvement than the unrestored.
Conclusion:
It can be concluded that there is no statistically significant difference in the health of the periodontium of restored and unrestored molars or correlation between the type, age, and status of the restorations on the molars and their periodontal health.
The odds of having bleeding on probing, tooth mobility, gingival recession, and furcation involvement tends to be higher with the restoration of the molars.
Related Results
Ecological restoration in rights‐of‐nature laws and restoration as a substantive right of nature: challenges and opportunities
Ecological restoration in rights‐of‐nature laws and restoration as a substantive right of nature: challenges and opportunities
Introduction
A growing number of countries have adopted legislation that recognizes nature as a subject of rights. The purpose of many rights‐of‐nature laws is ...
An evaluation tool for assessing coral restoration efforts
An evaluation tool for assessing coral restoration efforts
The ever-increasing need for coral restoration as a tool available to mitigate reef declines and aid in the recovery of lost ecosystem services requires improving restoration perfo...
Problematic Review and Normative Improvement of Alternative Restoration Responsibility under the Restoration Doctrine
Problematic Review and Normative Improvement of Alternative Restoration Responsibility under the Restoration Doctrine
From the perspective of restoration theory, substitutive restoration includes ex-situ homogeneous restoration, in-situ equivalent restoration, and ex-situ equivalent restoration. T...
In situ virtual restoration of artifacts by imaging technology
In situ virtual restoration of artifacts by imaging technology
Abstract
The restoration of incomplete artifacts is important for presenting the value of artifacts. Even though the existing methods provide rich solutions for the restora...
Realization and Prediction of Ecological Restoration Potential of Vegetation in Karst Areas
Realization and Prediction of Ecological Restoration Potential of Vegetation in Karst Areas
Based on the vegetation ecological quality index retrieved by satellite remote sensing in the karst areas of Guangxi in 2000–2019, the status of the ecological restoration of the v...
In situ virtual restoration of artifacts by imaging technology
In situ virtual restoration of artifacts by imaging technology
Abstract
The restoration of incomplete artifacts is important for presenting the value of artifacts. Even though the existing methods provide rich solutions for t...
Embracing eco‐cultural restoration
Embracing eco‐cultural restoration
The UN Decade of Restoration calls us to pursue more resilient and enduring approaches for restoration. One such approach is eco‐cultural restoration, which places the culture of l...
Using virtual imaging technology to restore artifacts in situ
Using virtual imaging technology to restore artifacts in situ
Abstract
The restoration of incomplete artifacts is important for presenting the value of artifacts. Even though the existing methods provide rich solutions for the restora...

