Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Under-Corrected but Not Underperforming: Residual Varus Does Not Compromise Early Outcomes After Robotic rKA TKA in Severe Varus Knees
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
: Kinematic alignment (KA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore native joint-line orientation and preserve ligament balance. However, implant design limits tibial varus correction to approximately 7°, potentially preventing full anatomical restoration in patients with severe tibial varus deformity (MPTA < 83°). This study compared radiographic and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted restricted KA (rKA) TKA in patients with severe versus moderate tibial varus.
Methods
: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 140 consecutive patients undergoing imageless robotic-assisted rKA TKA between January 2024 and April 2025. Patients were stratified into MPTA < 83° (n = 40) and MPTA ≥ 83° (n = 100) groups. All procedures used the VELYS robotic platform with a cemented cruciate-retaining ATTUNE prosthesis. Postoperative radiographic parameters (MPTA, LDFA, aHKA) and patient-reported outcome measures (KSFS, KSKS, OKS, SF-36 PCS/MCS) were assessed preoperatively and at 6 months. Day-one pain, ambulation distance, and range of motion were also evaluated. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was analysed.
Results
: Patients with MPTA < 83° had significantly greater preoperative varus deformity (− 8.1 ± 4.1° vs − 4.2 ± 2.3°, p < 0.001). Postoperatively, this group demonstrated lower MPTA (83.4 ± 2.5° vs 85.0 ± 2.5°, p = 0.005), greater residual varus (aHKA − 5.8 ± 4.6° vs − 3.2 ± 4.5°, p = 0.003), and lower rates of restoration of native MPTA (20% vs 70%, p < 0.001) and CPAK phenotype (20% vs 61%, p < 0.001). Despite this, both groups showed significant improvement across most functional outcomes with no significant between-group differences in change scores, MCID achievement, satisfaction, or expectation fulfilment at 6 months.
Conclusion
: Patients with severe tibial varus undergoing robotic rKA TKA achieved comparable short-term functional outcomes despite incomplete restoration of native alignment. These findings suggest that ligament balance and preservation of native kinematics may be more important determinants of early outcomes than complete radiographic correction.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Under-Corrected but Not Underperforming: Residual Varus Does Not Compromise Early Outcomes After Robotic rKA TKA in Severe Varus Knees
Description:
Abstract
Background
: Kinematic alignment (KA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore native joint-line orientation and preserve ligament balance.
However, implant design limits tibial varus correction to approximately 7°, potentially preventing full anatomical restoration in patients with severe tibial varus deformity (MPTA < 83°).
This study compared radiographic and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted restricted KA (rKA) TKA in patients with severe versus moderate tibial varus.
Methods
: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 140 consecutive patients undergoing imageless robotic-assisted rKA TKA between January 2024 and April 2025.
Patients were stratified into MPTA < 83° (n = 40) and MPTA ≥ 83° (n = 100) groups.
All procedures used the VELYS robotic platform with a cemented cruciate-retaining ATTUNE prosthesis.
Postoperative radiographic parameters (MPTA, LDFA, aHKA) and patient-reported outcome measures (KSFS, KSKS, OKS, SF-36 PCS/MCS) were assessed preoperatively and at 6 months.
Day-one pain, ambulation distance, and range of motion were also evaluated.
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was analysed.
Results
: Patients with MPTA < 83° had significantly greater preoperative varus deformity (− 8.
1 ± 4.
1° vs − 4.
2 ± 2.
3°, p < 0.
001).
Postoperatively, this group demonstrated lower MPTA (83.
4 ± 2.
5° vs 85.
0 ± 2.
5°, p = 0.
005), greater residual varus (aHKA − 5.
8 ± 4.
6° vs − 3.
2 ± 4.
5°, p = 0.
003), and lower rates of restoration of native MPTA (20% vs 70%, p < 0.
001) and CPAK phenotype (20% vs 61%, p < 0.
001).
Despite this, both groups showed significant improvement across most functional outcomes with no significant between-group differences in change scores, MCID achievement, satisfaction, or expectation fulfilment at 6 months.
Conclusion
: Patients with severe tibial varus undergoing robotic rKA TKA achieved comparable short-term functional outcomes despite incomplete restoration of native alignment.
These findings suggest that ligament balance and preservation of native kinematics may be more important determinants of early outcomes than complete radiographic correction.
Related Results
‘Extended’ restricted kinematic alignment results in decreased residual medial gap tightness among osteoarthritic varus knees during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
‘Extended’ restricted kinematic alignment results in decreased residual medial gap tightness among osteoarthritic varus knees during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
AimsThe aims of this study were: 1) to describe extended restricted kinematic alignment (E-rKA), a novel alignment strategy during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA)...
The degree of C-reactive protein elevation after total knee arthroplasty is related to bone and medullary injury rather than soft tissue
The degree of C-reactive protein elevation after total knee arthroplasty is related to bone and medullary injury rather than soft tissue
First, we want to find out whether computer-assisted surgery (CAS) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which does not require opening the femoral medullary canal, results in a lesse...
The Effect of Clinical Knee Measurement in Children with Genu Varus
The Effect of Clinical Knee Measurement in Children with Genu Varus
Abstract
Introduction
Children with genu varus needs frequent assessment and follow up that may need several radiographies. This study investigates the effectiveness of the clinica...
Outcomes of Bilateral Staged TKA in Patients Who Underwent both Conventional TKA and Robotic TKA: A Single Surgeon’s Experience
Outcomes of Bilateral Staged TKA in Patients Who Underwent both Conventional TKA and Robotic TKA: A Single Surgeon’s Experience
Introduction
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a leading treatment for severe knee osteoarthritis, offering improved function and pain relief. While conventional...
Conversion of UKA to TKA using identical standard implants—How does it compare to primary UKA, primary TKA and revision TKA?
Conversion of UKA to TKA using identical standard implants—How does it compare to primary UKA, primary TKA and revision TKA?
Abstract
Background
UKA is a well-established treatment option for anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee, resulting in superior functional outcome...
Robotic vs Navigational vs Conventional Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical and Radiological Long-Term Results with a Minimum Follow-up of 10 years -Survivalship Analysis-
Robotic vs Navigational vs Conventional Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical and Radiological Long-Term Results with a Minimum Follow-up of 10 years -Survivalship Analysis-
The aim of this study was (1) to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of robotic, navigational and conventional total knee arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of 10 yea...
Evaluating the Cost of Robotic-assisted Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
Evaluating the Cost of Robotic-assisted Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
Abstract
Purpose
As uptake of robotic-assisted arthroplasty increases there is a need for economic evaluation of the implementation and ongoing costs associated with robot...
Patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty using restricted kinematic alignment
Patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty using restricted kinematic alignment
AimsAlternative alignment concepts, including kinematic and restricted kinematic, have been introduced to help improve clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Th...

