Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Air-Q ILA as a conduit for orotracheal intubation in children: A randomized control trial for comparison between supine and lateral patient positions
View through CrossRef
Background and Aims:
Airway management in children is always challenging and becomes a concern if required in the lateral position. We evaluated the efficacy of orotracheal intubation using the Air-Q intubating laryngeal Airway (Air-Q ILA) in supine and lateral positions in children.
Material and Methods:
This study included 100 children weighing 7–30 kg, scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia. They were randomized into the supine (S) group or lateral (L) group. After anesthesia induction, the child was placed in a standard sniffing position for conventional laryngoscopy in the S group, and the child was turned into the lateral position in the L group. Both Air-Q ILA and endotracheal tube were placed blindly in the supine position in the S group and lateral position in group L. The grading of glottic view, success rate, insertion time of the Air-Q ILA, and endotracheal intubation were noted in both the groups.
Results:
The Air-Q ILA was successfully placed at the first attempt in 47 children in group S and 48 in group L. The overall blind orotracheal intubations, including first and second attempts, were successful in 45 children in the S group and 47 in the L group (P = 0.715). Eighty percent of patients in group L and 70% in group S had glottis grade 1 or 2 compared to grade 3, 4,5 (P = 0.249). The mean time of Air-Q ILA placement in groups S and L was 15.73 ± 5.64 s and 14.42 ± 4.16 s (P = 0.195). The mean duration of blind endotracheal intubation through the Air-Q ILA was 24.88 ± 14.75 s in group S and 17.57 ± 5.35 s in group L (P = 0.002). In both the groups, none of the children had bronchospasm, laryngospasm, desaturation, or aspiration. The airway trauma evident by blood staining on the Air-Q ILA on removal was revealed in 2 cases in group S, and 3 cases in group L. None of the children in group S and 4 children in group L had postoperative stridor. Postoperative hoarseness was reported in 3 children in group S and none in group L within 24 hours.
Conclusion:
The Air-Q ILA can be used as a conduit for blind orotracheal intubation in children in both supine and lateral positions while maintaining an effective airway seal.
Title: Air-Q ILA as a conduit for orotracheal intubation in children: A randomized control trial for comparison between supine and lateral patient positions
Description:
Background and Aims:
Airway management in children is always challenging and becomes a concern if required in the lateral position.
We evaluated the efficacy of orotracheal intubation using the Air-Q intubating laryngeal Airway (Air-Q ILA) in supine and lateral positions in children.
Material and Methods:
This study included 100 children weighing 7–30 kg, scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia.
They were randomized into the supine (S) group or lateral (L) group.
After anesthesia induction, the child was placed in a standard sniffing position for conventional laryngoscopy in the S group, and the child was turned into the lateral position in the L group.
Both Air-Q ILA and endotracheal tube were placed blindly in the supine position in the S group and lateral position in group L.
The grading of glottic view, success rate, insertion time of the Air-Q ILA, and endotracheal intubation were noted in both the groups.
Results:
The Air-Q ILA was successfully placed at the first attempt in 47 children in group S and 48 in group L.
The overall blind orotracheal intubations, including first and second attempts, were successful in 45 children in the S group and 47 in the L group (P = 0.
715).
Eighty percent of patients in group L and 70% in group S had glottis grade 1 or 2 compared to grade 3, 4,5 (P = 0.
249).
The mean time of Air-Q ILA placement in groups S and L was 15.
73 ± 5.
64 s and 14.
42 ± 4.
16 s (P = 0.
195).
The mean duration of blind endotracheal intubation through the Air-Q ILA was 24.
88 ± 14.
75 s in group S and 17.
57 ± 5.
35 s in group L (P = 0.
002).
In both the groups, none of the children had bronchospasm, laryngospasm, desaturation, or aspiration.
The airway trauma evident by blood staining on the Air-Q ILA on removal was revealed in 2 cases in group S, and 3 cases in group L.
None of the children in group S and 4 children in group L had postoperative stridor.
Postoperative hoarseness was reported in 3 children in group S and none in group L within 24 hours.
Conclusion:
The Air-Q ILA can be used as a conduit for blind orotracheal intubation in children in both supine and lateral positions while maintaining an effective airway seal.
Related Results
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Comparison of Airtraq® Laryngoscope, Bonfils Endoscope and Fiberoptic Bronchoscope for Awake Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Comparison of Airtraq® Laryngoscope, Bonfils Endoscope and Fiberoptic Bronchoscope for Awake Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Over the last decades several indirect laryngoscopes have been developed to provide a significant better glottic view and improved the success rate in difficult intubations. Some c...
Central haemodynamics in patients with severe postural hypotension
Central haemodynamics in patients with severe postural hypotension
SUMMARYCentral haemodynamics in the supine and head‐up tilted positions were studied in 24 patients with severe postural hypotension with and without supine hypertension. Results w...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Intraocular Pressure Variations in Postural Changes: Comparison between Obese and Non-Obese Controls
Intraocular Pressure Variations in Postural Changes: Comparison between Obese and Non-Obese Controls
Background: Comparing intraocular pressure (IOP) changes (ΔIOP) between obese subjects and non-obese controls in relation to different positions: standing, sitting, supine. Methods...
Clinical evaluation of Ambu® AuraGain™ as a conduit for intubation in paediatric patients: a descriptive study
Clinical evaluation of Ambu® AuraGain™ as a conduit for intubation in paediatric patients: a descriptive study
Introduction: Many paediatric difficult airway guidelines have recommended supraglottic airway devices (SGAs) as an indispensable tool in the algorithm for managing failed intubati...
Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Abstarct
Introduction
Orbital hydatid cysts (HCs) constitute less than 1% of all cases of hydatidosis, yet their occurrence is often linked to severe visual complications. This stu...
Simulating upright cervical lordosis in the supine position
Simulating upright cervical lordosis in the supine position
Cervical alignment or lordosis evolution is still attained by direct radiography in standing position because an ideal cervical curvature is essential to maintain a horizontal gaze...

