Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Future of Engineering Technology Education
View through CrossRef
Engineering technology education in the United States can trace its history back to the Wickenden and Spahr study of 1931, which identified the place of engineering technology education in the technical spectrum [1]. By 1945, the Engineering Council for Professional Development developed the first accreditation procedures for two-year engineering technology programs and by 1946, the first program was accredited. On this timeline the Purdue University engineering technology programs at Indianapolis can trace their history back to 1946 [2]. Over the last 70 years, engineering technology education in the United States has distinguished itself by a history of evolution, development and continuous improvement. Engineering technology education faces significant challenges during the next several years. These challenges are driven by the rapid evolution of computer technology and changing expectations of the educational process by the stakeholders. Stakeholders include not only students and faculty but also various groups in both the public and private sectors including industry, professional organizations, funding agencies, state government and the university system. Two specific challenges facing engineering technology educators are ‘basic faculty credentials’ and changing expectations for ‘creative activities’. These two challenges can be delineated by the following questions: • Will a doctorate degree be necessary for engineering technology faculty in the future for promotion and tenure in the university environment? • Will applied research or pedagogical research be ‘good enough’ for tenure? This paper addresses these two issues using a study of current engineering technology faculty hiring practices as a basis. Ultimately, critical future discussions must occur as engineering technology education continues to evolve and move into the future.
Title: Future of Engineering Technology Education
Description:
Engineering technology education in the United States can trace its history back to the Wickenden and Spahr study of 1931, which identified the place of engineering technology education in the technical spectrum [1].
By 1945, the Engineering Council for Professional Development developed the first accreditation procedures for two-year engineering technology programs and by 1946, the first program was accredited.
On this timeline the Purdue University engineering technology programs at Indianapolis can trace their history back to 1946 [2].
Over the last 70 years, engineering technology education in the United States has distinguished itself by a history of evolution, development and continuous improvement.
Engineering technology education faces significant challenges during the next several years.
These challenges are driven by the rapid evolution of computer technology and changing expectations of the educational process by the stakeholders.
Stakeholders include not only students and faculty but also various groups in both the public and private sectors including industry, professional organizations, funding agencies, state government and the university system.
Two specific challenges facing engineering technology educators are ‘basic faculty credentials’ and changing expectations for ‘creative activities’.
These two challenges can be delineated by the following questions: • Will a doctorate degree be necessary for engineering technology faculty in the future for promotion and tenure in the university environment? • Will applied research or pedagogical research be ‘good enough’ for tenure? This paper addresses these two issues using a study of current engineering technology faculty hiring practices as a basis.
Ultimately, critical future discussions must occur as engineering technology education continues to evolve and move into the future.
Related Results
The Body of Knowledge in Mechanical Engineering Technology
The Body of Knowledge in Mechanical Engineering Technology
In November 2004, the ASME Council on Education promulgated a vision of the future of mechanical engineering education based on the work of the ASME Body of Knowledge Taskforce. Un...
Volume 10, Index
Volume 10, Index
<p><strong>Vol 10, No 1 (2015)</strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><a href="http://www.world-education-center.org/index...
Online Education
Online Education
Online education is considered the latest generation in the practice of distance education. As described by professionals in the field, distance education is a form of teaching and...
Future Trends in Supply of Petroleum Engineering Manpower (Whiting)
Future Trends in Supply of Petroleum Engineering Manpower (Whiting)
Whiting, Robert L., Member SPE-AIME, Texas A and M Univ.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the future trends in t...
Citizenship Education
Citizenship Education
Citizenship education can be defined as educational theory and practice concerned with promoting a desired kind of citizenship in a given society. Citizenship is a contested concep...
HIGHER EDUCATION BRANDING
HIGHER EDUCATION BRANDING
Background. The increasing intensity of competition in the international market for higher education services leads to an increase in the importance of brands of higher education i...
From the Editor
From the Editor
Editorial It is the great honor for us to edit proceedings of “5th Cyprus International Conference on Educational Research (CYICER-2016)†31 March-02 April 2016, University of ...
Mapping of future technology themes in sustainable energy
Mapping of future technology themes in sustainable energy
PurposeTo anticipate science and technology (S&T) changes and shifts in the competitive environment for the preparation of strategic development in an organization, this paper ...

