Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Writing Great Domesday Book

View through CrossRef
Abstract This chapter examines how Great Domesday Book (GDB) was written, by comparing it with Exon Domesday. It starts with the order of writing, placing Wiltshire, Dorset, Somerset, Devon, and Cornwall at the end of the whole work. The question whether the GDB scribe worked directly from Exon or from a fair copy (resembling Little Domesday Book) is answered, chiefly from the presence in Exon of the GDB scribe’s hand and of a repeated marginal annotation f alongside entries where he rearranged the order of manors within a handful of fiefs. (Appendix 10.2 deals with the marginal annotation E.) There was no fair copy. The chapter next attends to the design of GDB, covering the page layout (mise-en-page), how introductory material and chapter lists for each shire were compiled, and, most fully, the scribe’s reshaping of the manorial descriptions. It shows that the GDB scribe was an adroit and astute editor, and describes how he compressed, rearranged, and reworded the text. The chapter covers his techniques for drastic shortening with minimal loss of content, as well as his lexicon, his facility with figures, his treatment of English place-names, and finally his errors. The design of GDB made it both a practical working document and a presentation copy of symbolic importance. Appendix 10.1 assesses the long-established idea that the scribe of GDB was a monk of Durham cathedral priory, and the more recent suggestion that he was the cantor of Winchester cathedral priory under Bishop Walkelin (a point developed in Chapter 18).
Title: Writing Great Domesday Book
Description:
Abstract This chapter examines how Great Domesday Book (GDB) was written, by comparing it with Exon Domesday.
It starts with the order of writing, placing Wiltshire, Dorset, Somerset, Devon, and Cornwall at the end of the whole work.
The question whether the GDB scribe worked directly from Exon or from a fair copy (resembling Little Domesday Book) is answered, chiefly from the presence in Exon of the GDB scribe’s hand and of a repeated marginal annotation f alongside entries where he rearranged the order of manors within a handful of fiefs.
(Appendix 10.
2 deals with the marginal annotation E.
) There was no fair copy.
The chapter next attends to the design of GDB, covering the page layout (mise-en-page), how introductory material and chapter lists for each shire were compiled, and, most fully, the scribe’s reshaping of the manorial descriptions.
It shows that the GDB scribe was an adroit and astute editor, and describes how he compressed, rearranged, and reworded the text.
The chapter covers his techniques for drastic shortening with minimal loss of content, as well as his lexicon, his facility with figures, his treatment of English place-names, and finally his errors.
The design of GDB made it both a practical working document and a presentation copy of symbolic importance.
Appendix 10.
1 assesses the long-established idea that the scribe of GDB was a monk of Durham cathedral priory, and the more recent suggestion that he was the cantor of Winchester cathedral priory under Bishop Walkelin (a point developed in Chapter 18).

Related Results

Introduction
Introduction
Abstract The introduction begins by sketching the historical significance of Domesday Book for the political, administrative, social, economic, and cultural history ...
Making Domesday
Making Domesday
Abstract This chapter integrates the main findings of the book and offers a new interpretation of how and why Domesday was made. It argues that the making of Domesda...
Afterword
Afterword
Abstract The Avowed Aim of this study has been to examine afresh the relationship between the Domesday inquest and Domesday Book. Its assertion that the aims and obj...
Domesday and the Geld
Domesday and the Geld
Abstract This chapter explores the connections between Domesday and the land tax known as the geld. Since the relationship between the two has been the subject of co...
The Domesday Inquest and Domesday Book
The Domesday Inquest and Domesday Book
Abstract Thus Far The analysis of the Domesday inquest has proceeded in terms of processes, namely, the collection of data, executive action, the formulation of repo...
The Domesday Texts
The Domesday Texts
Abstract To All Appearances the Domesday process is remarkably well documented. There is a handful of more or less independent accounts of the purpose of the inquiry...
Domesday Book Re‐Examined
Domesday Book Re‐Examined
Abstract‘Domesday Book re‐examined’ introduces the reader to the nature of Domesday Book (DB), the traditional interpretation of DB, and the historical background to the Conqueror'...
The Significance of King Henry I’s Pipe Roll
The Significance of King Henry I’s Pipe Roll
Abstract This chapter contends that the earliest surviving pipe roll—the pipe roll of Henry I, for the fiscal year 1129–30—is important for understanding Domesday...

Back to Top