Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Islam, Reason and Modernity in Colonial India: a Comparative Study of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan and Syed Ameer Ali
View through CrossRef
The paper examines the debates around reason and rationality in Islam, particularly in the works of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan and Syed Ameer Ali, locating their modernist articulation in the backdrop of socio-political context of colonial India. In the aftermath of the revolt of 1857, Muslims in India were subjected to institutional marginalisation, incarceration, civilisational stigma and intensified suspicion. As the orientalist discourse portrayed Muslims and Islam as an irrational, oriental and despotic tradition, it rendered Muslims political claims vulnerable to discrimination under colonial modernity. This crisis of political exclusion pushed for an articulation of Islam as a rational and ethical tradition. The paper argues that Sir Syed Ahmad Khan and Syed Ameer Ali reinterpreted Islam as a rational tradition which transcends mere theological category and served also as a political strategy of survival, locating Islam and Muslims as legitimate ethical civilisation. Sir Syed grounds his interpretation of Islam in a rationalist hermeneutics, through natural law and scientific reason which aimed at making Islamic tradition intelligible to colonial epistemology, enabling education, political participation and representation. Syed Ameer Ali while running on the similar thread, works along a parallel pathway of juridical and historical reasoning to defend Islam as a moral and constitutional epistemology. Though differing in methodology and approach, both thinkers rearticulated Islam as compatible with the changing world order. Through a comparative study of these two thinkers, the paper tries to identify the different and multiple rationalities within the framework of Islamic modernism in Colonial India.The paper states that this political idiom of survival and legitimacy works in extending and reshaping Muslim reformist thought, reoriented debate on constitutional politics, representation and institutional arrangement in colonial India. By foregrounding reason as a political strategy, the paper contributes to the intellectual history of Islam in South Asia and the ways through which modernist Islamic discourse negotiated through power, exclusion and belongingness under colonial rule in India.Keywords: Islam, Muslim, Colonialism, Modernity, Political exclusion, South Asia
Title: Islam, Reason and Modernity in Colonial India: a Comparative Study of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan and Syed Ameer Ali
Description:
The paper examines the debates around reason and rationality in Islam, particularly in the works of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan and Syed Ameer Ali, locating their modernist articulation in the backdrop of socio-political context of colonial India.
In the aftermath of the revolt of 1857, Muslims in India were subjected to institutional marginalisation, incarceration, civilisational stigma and intensified suspicion.
As the orientalist discourse portrayed Muslims and Islam as an irrational, oriental and despotic tradition, it rendered Muslims political claims vulnerable to discrimination under colonial modernity.
This crisis of political exclusion pushed for an articulation of Islam as a rational and ethical tradition.
The paper argues that Sir Syed Ahmad Khan and Syed Ameer Ali reinterpreted Islam as a rational tradition which transcends mere theological category and served also as a political strategy of survival, locating Islam and Muslims as legitimate ethical civilisation.
Sir Syed grounds his interpretation of Islam in a rationalist hermeneutics, through natural law and scientific reason which aimed at making Islamic tradition intelligible to colonial epistemology, enabling education, political participation and representation.
Syed Ameer Ali while running on the similar thread, works along a parallel pathway of juridical and historical reasoning to defend Islam as a moral and constitutional epistemology.
Though differing in methodology and approach, both thinkers rearticulated Islam as compatible with the changing world order.
Through a comparative study of these two thinkers, the paper tries to identify the different and multiple rationalities within the framework of Islamic modernism in Colonial India.
The paper states that this political idiom of survival and legitimacy works in extending and reshaping Muslim reformist thought, reoriented debate on constitutional politics, representation and institutional arrangement in colonial India.
By foregrounding reason as a political strategy, the paper contributes to the intellectual history of Islam in South Asia and the ways through which modernist Islamic discourse negotiated through power, exclusion and belongingness under colonial rule in India.
Keywords: Islam, Muslim, Colonialism, Modernity, Political exclusion, South Asia.
Related Results
Novedades sobre el enterramiento femenino de la Primera Edad del Hierro de Casa del Carpio (Belvís de la Jara, Toledo)
Novedades sobre el enterramiento femenino de la Primera Edad del Hierro de Casa del Carpio (Belvís de la Jara, Toledo)
Las características de la ubicación de la tumba de Casa del Carpio (Belvís de la Jara, Toledo), las circunstancias de su documentación, y lo excepcional del ajuar documentado han c...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Impact of opioid-free analgesia on pain severity and patient satisfaction after discharge from surgery: multispecialty, prospective cohort study in 25 countries
Impact of opioid-free analgesia on pain severity and patient satisfaction after discharge from surgery: multispecialty, prospective cohort study in 25 countries
Abstract
Background
Balancing opioid stewardship and the need for adequate analgesia following discharge after surgery is challe...
Predicting opioid consumption after surgical discharge: a multinational derivation and validation study using a foundation model
Predicting opioid consumption after surgical discharge: a multinational derivation and validation study using a foundation model
Abstract
Opioids are frequently overprescribed after surgery. We applied a tabular foundation model to predict the risk of post-discharge opioid consumption. The model wa...
Current Perspectives on Cystic Echinococcosis: A Systematic Review
Current Perspectives on Cystic Echinococcosis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Hydatidosis, a zoonotic disease caused by the larval stage of Echinococcus granulosus, is a significant public health concern with notable economic impact. I...
Death following pulmonary complications of surgery before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
Death following pulmonary complications of surgery before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to determine the impact of pulmonary complications on death after surgery both before and d...
Why Do Indians Experience Less Happiness Than Pakistanis?
Why Do Indians Experience Less Happiness Than Pakistanis?
This study explores the enigma of happiness inequality between India and Pakistan, despite India’s economic prowess. Employing inequality regression models, the study pinpoints cru...
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...

