Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Radical Theology of Prometheus Bound; or, on Prometheus' God Problem

View through CrossRef
Prometheus Bound (PV) is a meditation on God par excellence, second only perhaps to the Bible or Paradise Lost. It is, accordingly, the only extant tragedy from the ancient world featuring the most characters as gods. For this reason it stands out in a genre fixated principally on human suffering, where ‘death carries overwhelmingly more weight than salvation’. Gods, of course, do not suffer like humans: Prometheus, the play's protagonist extraordinaire, may be subject to an eternity of punishment for stealing fire from Zeus, but his pain, real and visceral as it is, differs from ours in that it lacks the potential closure of death. It is perhaps justifiable then to suggest the play's focus is not just the awful things gods are capable of doing to one another (just like humans), but rather the meaning of such behaviour without the ultimate consequence (death). That is, the portrayal of Prometheus suffering and Zeus menacing redounds equally to the type of characters they are as to simply what they are. Whereas the former aspect is of psychological or political interest, the latter is a theological concern. And PV is theological in its implications as much as it is political. Hence the question: What type of theology does it convey? The answer is complex.In the modern world PV has primarily been read for its political allegory—as a meditation on oppression, or martyrdom for the intellectual cause. Eric Havelock's translation and study of the play, to cite an illustrative example, was called The Crucifixion of Intellectual Man (1950). Many critics therefore argue that the play articulates the conflict between Prometheus and Zeus in terms of freedom versus authoritarianism. As Shelley famously wrote in the prologue to his Prometheus Unbound, the imprisoned Prometheus represents ‘the highest perfection of moral and intellectual nature impelled by the purest and the truest motives to the best and noblest ends’ (1820). Marx and Goethe felt similarly. This position aligns Prometheus with the forces of enlightenment and progress over against the brutality of Zeus's authority.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: The Radical Theology of Prometheus Bound; or, on Prometheus' God Problem
Description:
Prometheus Bound (PV) is a meditation on God par excellence, second only perhaps to the Bible or Paradise Lost.
It is, accordingly, the only extant tragedy from the ancient world featuring the most characters as gods.
For this reason it stands out in a genre fixated principally on human suffering, where ‘death carries overwhelmingly more weight than salvation’.
Gods, of course, do not suffer like humans: Prometheus, the play's protagonist extraordinaire, may be subject to an eternity of punishment for stealing fire from Zeus, but his pain, real and visceral as it is, differs from ours in that it lacks the potential closure of death.
It is perhaps justifiable then to suggest the play's focus is not just the awful things gods are capable of doing to one another (just like humans), but rather the meaning of such behaviour without the ultimate consequence (death).
That is, the portrayal of Prometheus suffering and Zeus menacing redounds equally to the type of characters they are as to simply what they are.
Whereas the former aspect is of psychological or political interest, the latter is a theological concern.
And PV is theological in its implications as much as it is political.
Hence the question: What type of theology does it convey? The answer is complex.
In the modern world PV has primarily been read for its political allegory—as a meditation on oppression, or martyrdom for the intellectual cause.
Eric Havelock's translation and study of the play, to cite an illustrative example, was called The Crucifixion of Intellectual Man (1950).
Many critics therefore argue that the play articulates the conflict between Prometheus and Zeus in terms of freedom versus authoritarianism.
As Shelley famously wrote in the prologue to his Prometheus Unbound, the imprisoned Prometheus represents ‘the highest perfection of moral and intellectual nature impelled by the purest and the truest motives to the best and noblest ends’ (1820).
Marx and Goethe felt similarly.
This position aligns Prometheus with the forces of enlightenment and progress over against the brutality of Zeus's authority.

Related Results

The Analysis of the Relationship between God, Religion and Politics in Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan and De Cive
The Analysis of the Relationship between God, Religion and Politics in Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan and De Cive
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) was a significant political theorist who could be regarded as the founder of social contract theories. Hobbes’s philosophy is worthy of attention in the h...
Wild Prometheus: A Strategic Primitivism and the Question Concerning Technology
Wild Prometheus: A Strategic Primitivism and the Question Concerning Technology
The article is devoted to the elaboration of conceptual trajectories of strategic primitivism against the background of today’s projects of undermining capital by acceleration (acc...
The Title of Prometheus Desmotes
The Title of Prometheus Desmotes
All I hope to do in this note is to reinforce Lesky's protest against ‘the attitude of mind shown by many modern scholars, who refuse to admit that there is a Prometheus problem at...
Prometheus in Russia: from revolution to dissidence
Prometheus in Russia: from revolution to dissidence
Abstract This essay examines the development of the image of Prometheus as a symbol of the revolutionary in Russia and the Soviet Union. After providing a historical...
Encountering Evil: The Evil-god Challenge from Religious Experience
Encountering Evil: The Evil-god Challenge from Religious Experience
It is often thought that religious experiences provide support for the cumulative case for the existence of the God of classical monotheism. In this paper, I formulate an Evil-god ...
Prometheus Bound
Prometheus Bound
In this paper I shall outline a possible new interpretation of Aeschylus' Prometheus Bound. I find that despite universal agreement that this drama has immediate and deep relevance...
Aristophanes and the Prometheus Bound
Aristophanes and the Prometheus Bound
It has been acknowledged ever since H. T. Becker's dissertation on Aeschylus in Greek comedy that Aristophanes' plays can provide us with a terminus ante quern for the composition ...
Divine Poiesis and Abstract Entities
Divine Poiesis and Abstract Entities
According to Anselm, God is understood as a being than which nothing greater can be conceived. God is the greatest possible being. In this tradition, which has come to be spoken of...

Recent Results


Back to Top