Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Radical Theology of Prometheus Bound; or, on Prometheus' God Problem

View through CrossRef
Prometheus Bound (PV) is a meditation on God par excellence, second only perhaps to the Bible or Paradise Lost. It is, accordingly, the only extant tragedy from the ancient world featuring the most characters as gods. For this reason it stands out in a genre fixated principally on human suffering, where ‘death carries overwhelmingly more weight than salvation’. Gods, of course, do not suffer like humans: Prometheus, the play's protagonist extraordinaire, may be subject to an eternity of punishment for stealing fire from Zeus, but his pain, real and visceral as it is, differs from ours in that it lacks the potential closure of death. It is perhaps justifiable then to suggest the play's focus is not just the awful things gods are capable of doing to one another (just like humans), but rather the meaning of such behaviour without the ultimate consequence (death). That is, the portrayal of Prometheus suffering and Zeus menacing redounds equally to the type of characters they are as to simply what they are. Whereas the former aspect is of psychological or political interest, the latter is a theological concern. And PV is theological in its implications as much as it is political. Hence the question: What type of theology does it convey? The answer is complex.In the modern world PV has primarily been read for its political allegory—as a meditation on oppression, or martyrdom for the intellectual cause. Eric Havelock's translation and study of the play, to cite an illustrative example, was called The Crucifixion of Intellectual Man (1950). Many critics therefore argue that the play articulates the conflict between Prometheus and Zeus in terms of freedom versus authoritarianism. As Shelley famously wrote in the prologue to his Prometheus Unbound, the imprisoned Prometheus represents ‘the highest perfection of moral and intellectual nature impelled by the purest and the truest motives to the best and noblest ends’ (1820). Marx and Goethe felt similarly. This position aligns Prometheus with the forces of enlightenment and progress over against the brutality of Zeus's authority.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: The Radical Theology of Prometheus Bound; or, on Prometheus' God Problem
Description:
Prometheus Bound (PV) is a meditation on God par excellence, second only perhaps to the Bible or Paradise Lost.
It is, accordingly, the only extant tragedy from the ancient world featuring the most characters as gods.
For this reason it stands out in a genre fixated principally on human suffering, where ‘death carries overwhelmingly more weight than salvation’.
Gods, of course, do not suffer like humans: Prometheus, the play's protagonist extraordinaire, may be subject to an eternity of punishment for stealing fire from Zeus, but his pain, real and visceral as it is, differs from ours in that it lacks the potential closure of death.
It is perhaps justifiable then to suggest the play's focus is not just the awful things gods are capable of doing to one another (just like humans), but rather the meaning of such behaviour without the ultimate consequence (death).
That is, the portrayal of Prometheus suffering and Zeus menacing redounds equally to the type of characters they are as to simply what they are.
Whereas the former aspect is of psychological or political interest, the latter is a theological concern.
And PV is theological in its implications as much as it is political.
Hence the question: What type of theology does it convey? The answer is complex.
In the modern world PV has primarily been read for its political allegory—as a meditation on oppression, or martyrdom for the intellectual cause.
Eric Havelock's translation and study of the play, to cite an illustrative example, was called The Crucifixion of Intellectual Man (1950).
Many critics therefore argue that the play articulates the conflict between Prometheus and Zeus in terms of freedom versus authoritarianism.
As Shelley famously wrote in the prologue to his Prometheus Unbound, the imprisoned Prometheus represents ‘the highest perfection of moral and intellectual nature impelled by the purest and the truest motives to the best and noblest ends’ (1820).
Marx and Goethe felt similarly.
This position aligns Prometheus with the forces of enlightenment and progress over against the brutality of Zeus's authority.

Related Results

Recreating Prometheus
Recreating Prometheus
Prometheus, chained to a rock, having his liver pecked out by a great bird only for the organ to grow back again each night so that the torture may be repeated afresh the next day ...
Aeschylus' Prometheus
Aeschylus' Prometheus
Prometheus Bound (Prometheus Vinctus) is a tragedy of disputed authorship in the Aeschylean corpus, and the only extant Greek drama populated almost entirely by divine beings. The ...
Prometheus
Prometheus
Prometheus is a foundational figure in Greek myth and thought. He is a trickster, who has been compared with similarly devious characters in other cultures and mythologies. Traditi...
The Angels of God
The Angels of God
Abstract This chapter establishes the creator-created, eternal-temporal distinction that is foundational for Augustine’s theology. This distinction forms the basis f...
Encountering Evil: The Evil-god Challenge from Religious Experience
Encountering Evil: The Evil-god Challenge from Religious Experience
It is often thought that religious experiences provide support for the cumulative case for the existence of the God of classical monotheism. In this paper, I formulate an Evil-god ...
Divine Poiesis and Abstract Entities
Divine Poiesis and Abstract Entities
According to Anselm, God is understood as a being than which nothing greater can be conceived. God is the greatest possible being. In this tradition, which has come to be spoken of...
Hellenic Theology of Early Classical Period
Hellenic Theology of Early Classical Period
The author analyzes the transformations of Hellenic theologys content and forms in the epoch of early antique classics (1st half of the 5th century B.C.). The general orientation o...
Malthus, Jesus, and Darwin
Malthus, Jesus, and Darwin
Malthus' theological ideas were most clearly presented in the final two chapters of the first edition (1798) of his Essay on the Principle of Population. They can be classified und...

Recent Results

Unsupervised Learning
Unsupervised Learning
What use can the brain make of the massive flow of sensory information that occurs without any associated rewards or punishments? This question is reviewed in the light of connecti...
Urban Patterns in Pre-Safavid Isfahan
Urban Patterns in Pre-Safavid Isfahan
The splendour of Safavid Isfahan is no doubt proverbial. The landmarks that come to mind--the great Maydān-i Shāh with its stage perpetually set, the elegant Chahār Bāgh avenue, th...
Mode coupling and scattering in a submarine canyon environment
Mode coupling and scattering in a submarine canyon environment
Acoustic propagation in a realistic ocean environment based on the Hudson Canyon is computed using an Omnidirectional Coupled Mode (OCM) and a 3-D Parabolic Equation (3DPE) approac...
„Man vergilt einem Lehrer schlecht, wenn man immer nur der Schüler bleibt“: Ein neuer Blick auf Gasts Verhältnis zu Nietzsche
„Man vergilt einem Lehrer schlecht, wenn man immer nur der Schüler bleibt“: Ein neuer Blick auf Gasts Verhältnis zu Nietzsche
Abstract “One repays a teacher poorly, if one always remains only a student”: A New Look at Gast’s Relation to Nietzsche. It is widely known that Heinrich Köselitz (...

Back to Top