Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Stakeholder Perceptions of Success in Human-Carnivore Coexistence Interventions

View through CrossRef
Human-carnivore coexistence (HCC) on agricultural lands affects wildlife and human communities around the world, whereby a lack of HCC is a central concern for conservation and farmer livelihoods alike. For intervention strategies aimed at facilitating HCC to achieve their desired goals it is essential to understand how interventions and their success are perceived by different stakeholders. Using a grounded theory approach, interviews (n=31) were conducted with key stakeholders (commercial livestock farmers, conservationists and protected area managers) involved in HCC scenarios in Limpopo, South Africa. Interviews explored perceptions of successful intervention strategies (aimed at increasing HCC), factors that contribute to perceptions of strategy effectiveness and whether coexistence was a concept that stakeholders considered achievable. The use of grounded theory emphasised the individual nature and previously unexplored facets to HCC experiences. The majority of stakeholders based their measures of success on changes in livestock loss. Concern has been raised over the subjectivity and reliance on recall that this measure involves, potentially reducing its reliability as an indicator of functional effectiveness. However, it was relied on heavily by users of HCC interventions in our study and is therefore likely influential in subsequent behaviour and decision-making regarding the intervention. Nonetheless, perceptions of success were not just shaped by livestock loss but influenced by various social, cultural, economic and political factors emphasising the challenges of defining and achieving HCC goals. Perceptions of coexistence varied; some stakeholders considered farmer-carnivore coexistence to be impossible, but most indicated it was feasible with certain caveats. An important element of inter-stakeholder misunderstanding became apparent, especially regarding the respective perceptions of coexistence and responsibility for its achievement. Without fully understanding these perceptions and their underpinning factors, interventions may be restricted in their capacity to meet the expectations of all interested parties. The study highlights the need to understand and explore the perceptions of all stakeholders when implementing intervention strategies in order to properly define and evaluate the achievement of HCC goals.
Title: Stakeholder Perceptions of Success in Human-Carnivore Coexistence Interventions
Description:
Human-carnivore coexistence (HCC) on agricultural lands affects wildlife and human communities around the world, whereby a lack of HCC is a central concern for conservation and farmer livelihoods alike.
For intervention strategies aimed at facilitating HCC to achieve their desired goals it is essential to understand how interventions and their success are perceived by different stakeholders.
Using a grounded theory approach, interviews (n=31) were conducted with key stakeholders (commercial livestock farmers, conservationists and protected area managers) involved in HCC scenarios in Limpopo, South Africa.
Interviews explored perceptions of successful intervention strategies (aimed at increasing HCC), factors that contribute to perceptions of strategy effectiveness and whether coexistence was a concept that stakeholders considered achievable.
The use of grounded theory emphasised the individual nature and previously unexplored facets to HCC experiences.
The majority of stakeholders based their measures of success on changes in livestock loss.
Concern has been raised over the subjectivity and reliance on recall that this measure involves, potentially reducing its reliability as an indicator of functional effectiveness.
However, it was relied on heavily by users of HCC interventions in our study and is therefore likely influential in subsequent behaviour and decision-making regarding the intervention.
Nonetheless, perceptions of success were not just shaped by livestock loss but influenced by various social, cultural, economic and political factors emphasising the challenges of defining and achieving HCC goals.
Perceptions of coexistence varied; some stakeholders considered farmer-carnivore coexistence to be impossible, but most indicated it was feasible with certain caveats.
An important element of inter-stakeholder misunderstanding became apparent, especially regarding the respective perceptions of coexistence and responsibility for its achievement.
Without fully understanding these perceptions and their underpinning factors, interventions may be restricted in their capacity to meet the expectations of all interested parties.
The study highlights the need to understand and explore the perceptions of all stakeholders when implementing intervention strategies in order to properly define and evaluate the achievement of HCC goals.

Related Results

High-Mountain Carnivore Assemblage and Sustainable Conservation Priorities in the K2 Landscape
High-Mountain Carnivore Assemblage and Sustainable Conservation Priorities in the K2 Landscape
Mammalian carnivores play an important role in maintaining the integrity of an ecosystem; therefore, their conservation as an umbrella species ensures the conservation of other spe...
Digital Mental Health Landscaping in Low- and Middle-Income Countries 
Digital Mental Health Landscaping in Low- and Middle-Income Countries 
Introduction The aim of this project was to map the landscape of who is doing what and where in digital mental health, and to pr...
Human–Carnivore Conflict in and Around Kafta Sheraro National Park, Northern Ethiopia: Determinants, Costs, and Conservation Implications
Human–Carnivore Conflict in and Around Kafta Sheraro National Park, Northern Ethiopia: Determinants, Costs, and Conservation Implications
Resolving human–carnivore conflict is crucial for the sustainable coexistence of humans and wildlife. Achieving this, however, requires a comprehensive understanding of the causes ...
Dietary and temporal partitioning facilitate sympatric coexistence of carnivore assemblage in the Everest region
Dietary and temporal partitioning facilitate sympatric coexistence of carnivore assemblage in the Everest region
Carnivore communities are extremely important for maintaining the structure/function of ecosystems. Exploring the carnivore coexistence can provide the data needed for the developm...
Animal owners’ appraisal of large carnivore presence and use of interventions to prevent carnivore attacks on domestic animals in Sweden
Animal owners’ appraisal of large carnivore presence and use of interventions to prevent carnivore attacks on domestic animals in Sweden
AbstractLarge carnivores elicit strong emotional reactions, which could influence consensus or social conflicts between persons promoting wildlife conservation and people who suffe...
Guidelines for evaluating the success of large carnivore reintroductions
Guidelines for evaluating the success of large carnivore reintroductions
Abstract Anthropogenic impacts have led to widespread species decline and extirpation, thereby compelling a global movement to protect and regenerate biodiversity t...
With Allee effects, life for the social carnivore is complicated
With Allee effects, life for the social carnivore is complicated
AbstractAnthropogenic modification of the landscape, resultant habitat loss, and decades of persecution have resulted in severe decline and fragmentation of large carnivore populat...
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND PROJECT PERFORMANCE OF ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN CENTRAL EQUATORIA STATE, SOUTH SUDAN
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND PROJECT PERFORMANCE OF ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN CENTRAL EQUATORIA STATE, SOUTH SUDAN
Objective: This study sought to establish the relationship between stakeholder engagement practices and the performance of road infrastructure projects in Central Equatoria State, ...

Back to Top