Numerical Simulation of Mechanical Parameters of Oil Shale Rock in Minfeng Subsag

Rock mechanical parameters can provide fundamental data for the numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing, aiding in the construction of hydraulic fracturing models. Due to the laminated nature of shale, constructing a hydraulic fracturing model requires obtaining the rock mechanical parameters of each lamina and the bedding planes. However, acquiring the mechanical parameters of individual shale laminas through physical experiments demands that, after rock mechanics testing, cracks propagate along the centre of the laminae without connecting additional bedding planes, which imposes extremely high requirements on shale samples. Current research on the rock mechanics of the Minfeng subsag shale is relatively limited. Therefore, to obtain the rock mechanical parameters of each lamina and the bedding planes in the Minfeng subsag shale, a numerical simulation approach can be employed. The model, built using PFC2D, is based on prior X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, conventional thin-section observation, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Brazilian splitting tests, and triaxial compression tests. It replicates the processes of the Brazilian splitting and triaxial compression experiments, assigning initial parameters to different bedding planes based on lithology. A trial-and-error method is then used to adjust the parameters until the simulated curves match the physical experimental curves, with errors within 10%. The model parameters for each lamina at this stage are then applied to single-lithology Brazilian splitting, biaxial compression, and three-point bending models for simulation, ultimately obtaining the tensile strength, uniaxial compressive strength, Poisson’s ratio, Young’s modulus, brittleness index, and Mode I fracture toughness for each lamina. Simulation results show that the Minfeng subsag shale exhibits strong heterogeneity, with all obtained rock mechanical parameters spanning a wide range. Calculated brittleness indices for each lamina mostly fall within the “good” and “medium” ranges, with carbonate laminae generally demonstrating better brittleness than felsic laminae. Fracture toughness also clearly divides into two ranges: mixed carbonate shale laminae have overall higher fracture toughness than mixed felsic laminae.