Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Quantification of Above- and Below-Ground Carbon Stocks in Selected Community Forests of Nepal: A Case Study from Community Forest and Government Managed Forest of Sindhupalchok District, Nepal

View through CrossRef
The study entitled “Quantification of above and below ground carbon stocks in selected community forests of Nepal (A case from Community Forest and Government Managed Forest of Sindhupalchok, Nepal)” was aimed at to estimate the above ground and below ground carbon stock of Selang Manju Community Forest and LakpaDorje Government Managed Forest of Sindhupalchok district, Nepal. Out of the total 196.16 ha Community forest area 1.5 ha i.e. 0.76% area was selected for the forest inventory. All together there are 30 plots in the community forest and other 30 plots in the government-managed forest.Primary and Secondary data were collected and analyzed by using the t test. Tree carbon stock in Government managed forest was found to be higher with 77.86 ton/ha than CF with 74.39 ton/ha. Tree carbon stock of Government managed forest is very high because in the National Forest there were lots of old trees which have carbon storage but they do not have sequestrating capacity anymore. Sapling carbon stock was found to be lower in government managed forest with 0.92 ton/ha than in community forest with 0.97 ton/ha. LHG carbon was found to be higher 1.31 ton/ha in government-managed forest than CF with CF with 1.16 ton/ha. Dead wood carbon stock in Government managed forest was found to be higher with 12.01 ton/ha than CF with 11.48 ton/ha. The below ground carbon consists of Root Carbon. The root carbon of government managed forest was found to be higher with 16.58 ton/ha than community forest with 15.84 ton/ha. The soil organic carbon was found to be 170.54 ton/ha in community forest and 172.18 ton/ha in government managed forest. Total carbon stock of Government managed forest was found to be higher with 280.86 ton/ha than community forest with 274.28 ton/ha. The total carbon stock of the community forest is 274.28 ton/ha similarly the total carbon stock of the government managed forest 280.86 ton/ha. The total carbon in the community forest is 53802.76 ton similarly the total carbon in the government managed forest is 57576.30 ton. The total carbon in the community forest is less than the government managed forest. There is significance difference between mean above ground (Shoot, LHG, and dead wood) carbon stock of CF and GMF however there is significance difference between mean sapling carbon stock of CF GMF. There is significance difference between mean below ground (Root and Soil) carbon stock of CF and GMF at 5% level of significance.
Title: Quantification of Above- and Below-Ground Carbon Stocks in Selected Community Forests of Nepal: A Case Study from Community Forest and Government Managed Forest of Sindhupalchok District, Nepal
Description:
The study entitled “Quantification of above and below ground carbon stocks in selected community forests of Nepal (A case from Community Forest and Government Managed Forest of Sindhupalchok, Nepal)” was aimed at to estimate the above ground and below ground carbon stock of Selang Manju Community Forest and LakpaDorje Government Managed Forest of Sindhupalchok district, Nepal.
Out of the total 196.
16 ha Community forest area 1.
5 ha i.
e.
0.
76% area was selected for the forest inventory.
All together there are 30 plots in the community forest and other 30 plots in the government-managed forest.
Primary and Secondary data were collected and analyzed by using the t test.
Tree carbon stock in Government managed forest was found to be higher with 77.
86 ton/ha than CF with 74.
39 ton/ha.
Tree carbon stock of Government managed forest is very high because in the National Forest there were lots of old trees which have carbon storage but they do not have sequestrating capacity anymore.
Sapling carbon stock was found to be lower in government managed forest with 0.
92 ton/ha than in community forest with 0.
97 ton/ha.
LHG carbon was found to be higher 1.
31 ton/ha in government-managed forest than CF with CF with 1.
16 ton/ha.
Dead wood carbon stock in Government managed forest was found to be higher with 12.
01 ton/ha than CF with 11.
48 ton/ha.
The below ground carbon consists of Root Carbon.
The root carbon of government managed forest was found to be higher with 16.
58 ton/ha than community forest with 15.
84 ton/ha.
The soil organic carbon was found to be 170.
54 ton/ha in community forest and 172.
18 ton/ha in government managed forest.
Total carbon stock of Government managed forest was found to be higher with 280.
86 ton/ha than community forest with 274.
28 ton/ha.
The total carbon stock of the community forest is 274.
28 ton/ha similarly the total carbon stock of the government managed forest 280.
86 ton/ha.
The total carbon in the community forest is 53802.
76 ton similarly the total carbon in the government managed forest is 57576.
30 ton.
The total carbon in the community forest is less than the government managed forest.
There is significance difference between mean above ground (Shoot, LHG, and dead wood) carbon stock of CF and GMF however there is significance difference between mean sapling carbon stock of CF GMF.
There is significance difference between mean below ground (Root and Soil) carbon stock of CF and GMF at 5% level of significance.

Related Results

Evaluation of Biomass Stock in Two Differently Managed Forests of Nepal: A Case Study from Sindhupalchok District, Nepal
Evaluation of Biomass Stock in Two Differently Managed Forests of Nepal: A Case Study from Sindhupalchok District, Nepal
The study entitled “Evaluation of Biomass stock in two differently managed forests of Nepal (A case Sindhupalchok District Nepal)” aimed at to estimate the biomass stock of Selang ...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Effects of land-use changes on carbon stocks : a case study in Nam Yao Sub-Watershed, Nan Province, Thailand
Effects of land-use changes on carbon stocks : a case study in Nam Yao Sub-Watershed, Nan Province, Thailand
The study was conducted to assess carbon (C) stock potential in forest, reforestation and agricultural land-use types and reliably estimate the impact of land use on C stocks in Na...
Ecosystem carbon storage, allocation and carbon credit values of major forest types in the central Himalaya
Ecosystem carbon storage, allocation and carbon credit values of major forest types in the central Himalaya
Abstract Himalayan forests are crucial global carbon reservoirs that contribute significantly to carbon mitigation efforts. Although situated within a single climatic zon...
Forest Structure and Potential of Carbon Storage at Khao Nam Sab, Kasetsart University, Sri Racha Campus, Chonburi Province
Forest Structure and Potential of Carbon Storage at Khao Nam Sab, Kasetsart University, Sri Racha Campus, Chonburi Province
Background and Objectives: Tropical Forest ecosystems are globally significant for their roles in biodiversity conservation, climate regulation, and carbon sequestration. In Thaila...
Secondary Succession in the Lowland Forests of the Marlborough Sounds Maritime Park
Secondary Succession in the Lowland Forests of the Marlborough Sounds Maritime Park
<p>This study documents aspects of the forest recovery process in secondary communities of the Marlborough sounds Maritime park. some 39 types of seral vegetation were recogn...
Managing temperate forests for carbon storage: impacts of logging versus forest protection on carbon stocks
Managing temperate forests for carbon storage: impacts of logging versus forest protection on carbon stocks
Management of native forests offers opportunities to store more carbon in the land sector through two main activities. Emissions to the atmosphere can be avoided by ceasing logging...

Back to Top