Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of WHO laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based CVD risk Charts among Hypertensive Adults Attending Primary Healthcare Centers in West Africa Sub-region

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background The World Health Organization (WHO) non-laboratory cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk chart is sub-region-specific and is advocated in resource-constrained settings. However, the extent of agreement with laboratory-based assessment among hypertensive adults attending primary health centers (PHCs) in the West Africa sub-region remains unknown. This study compared 10-year CVD risk among adults with hypertension attending PHCs in Ghana and Nigeria. Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study recruited 319 adults with hypertension at PHCs in Ghana and Nigeria. All participants had their blood pressures, anthropometrics, fasting blood sugar, and fasting cholesterol measured following standard procedures. WHO laboratory and non-laboratory CVD risks were assessed and compared using Kappa’s statistics, correlation, and Bland-Altman Plot. Results The median (interquartile range) for laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based CVD risk scores were comparable [7.0 (4.0 11.0) vs. 7.0 (4.0 to 11.0), p = 0.914]. Of the 319 participants, laboratory-based assessment classified 214 (67.1%) as low risk, while 210 (65.8%) were classified as low risk using the non-laboratory method. Eleven (3.4%) and 14 (4.4%) participants were classified as high-risk using laboratory- and non-laboratory-based methods, respectively. Overall, there was a very good positive correlation between the CVD risk assessment methods (r = 0.948, p<0.001). For all participants combined, there was substantial agreement (Kappa statistics), with K = 0.766. Bland-Altman showed a mean bias of 0.15 (SD = 1.74) in favor of non-laboratory-based assessment of CVD with an upper limit of 3.57 and a lower limit of -3.26. Conclusion There was substantial agreement between laboratory- and non-laboratory-based WHO CVD risk charts in this study. In low-resource settings, such as Ghana and Nigeria, the WHO non-laboratory CVD risk prediction model offers a huge opportunity for primary CVD prevention in adults with hypertension.
Title: Comparison of WHO laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based CVD risk Charts among Hypertensive Adults Attending Primary Healthcare Centers in West Africa Sub-region
Description:
Abstract Background The World Health Organization (WHO) non-laboratory cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk chart is sub-region-specific and is advocated in resource-constrained settings.
However, the extent of agreement with laboratory-based assessment among hypertensive adults attending primary health centers (PHCs) in the West Africa sub-region remains unknown.
This study compared 10-year CVD risk among adults with hypertension attending PHCs in Ghana and Nigeria.
Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study recruited 319 adults with hypertension at PHCs in Ghana and Nigeria.
All participants had their blood pressures, anthropometrics, fasting blood sugar, and fasting cholesterol measured following standard procedures.
WHO laboratory and non-laboratory CVD risks were assessed and compared using Kappa’s statistics, correlation, and Bland-Altman Plot.
Results The median (interquartile range) for laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based CVD risk scores were comparable [7.
0 (4.
0 11.
0) vs.
7.
0 (4.
0 to 11.
0), p = 0.
914].
Of the 319 participants, laboratory-based assessment classified 214 (67.
1%) as low risk, while 210 (65.
8%) were classified as low risk using the non-laboratory method.
Eleven (3.
4%) and 14 (4.
4%) participants were classified as high-risk using laboratory- and non-laboratory-based methods, respectively.
Overall, there was a very good positive correlation between the CVD risk assessment methods (r = 0.
948, p<0.
001).
For all participants combined, there was substantial agreement (Kappa statistics), with K = 0.
766.
Bland-Altman showed a mean bias of 0.
15 (SD = 1.
74) in favor of non-laboratory-based assessment of CVD with an upper limit of 3.
57 and a lower limit of -3.
26.
Conclusion There was substantial agreement between laboratory- and non-laboratory-based WHO CVD risk charts in this study.
In low-resource settings, such as Ghana and Nigeria, the WHO non-laboratory CVD risk prediction model offers a huge opportunity for primary CVD prevention in adults with hypertension.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Abstract Introduction Telemedicine is the remote delivery of healthcare services using information and communication technologies and has gained global recognition as a solution to...
Dairy consumption and incident cardiovascular disease: a global analysis
Dairy consumption and incident cardiovascular disease: a global analysis
Abstract BACKGROUND The role of dairy products in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains highly debated...
Cardiovascular Disease in Adolescents and Young Adults with Hematologic Malignancies
Cardiovascular Disease in Adolescents and Young Adults with Hematologic Malignancies
Abstract Introduction: Advances in treatment strategies and supportive care have resulted in a growing number of survivors of adolescents and young adults (AYA: diag...
Associations of multiple serum biomarkers and the risk of cardiovascular disease in China
Associations of multiple serum biomarkers and the risk of cardiovascular disease in China
Abstract Background Previous studies focus on one or several serum biomarkers and the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aims to investigate the association of multip...
Surveillance utilizes multi-omics in cardiovascular disease: Diet and its potentiality in Preventive index
Surveillance utilizes multi-omics in cardiovascular disease: Diet and its potentiality in Preventive index
Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) is characterized by multidimensional risks including drug, diet, lifestyle, stress, and metabolomics diseases which cause mortality and morbidity depen...

Back to Top