Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Healing Pattern Classification for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures after Posterior Short-segment Fixation
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background: Thoracolumbar burst fractures can be treated with posterior short-segment fixation. However, no classification can help to estimate whether the healed vertebral body will have sufficient stability after implant removal. We aimed to develop a Healing Pattern Classification (HPC) to evaluate the stability of the healed vertebra based on cavity size and location.Methods: Fifty-two thoracolumbar burst fracture patients treated with posterior short-segmental fixation without fusion and followed up for an average of 3.2 years were retrospectively studied. The HPC was divided into 4 types: type I - no cavity; type II - a small cavity with or without the violation of one endplate; type III - a large cavity with or without the violation of one endplate; and type IV - a burst cavity with the violation of both endplates or the lateral cortical shell. The intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the HPC were assessed. The demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes of the cohort were compared between the stable group (types I and II) and the unstable group (types III and IV). Logistic regression was conducted to evaluate risk factors for unstable healing.Results: The intraobserver and interobserver ICCs of the HPC were 0.86 (95% CI=0.74-0.90) and 0.77 (95% CI=0.59-0.86), respectively. While the unstable healing group (types III and IV) accounted for 59.6% of the patients, most of these patients were asymptomatic. The preoperative Load Sharing Classification (LSC) comminution score may predict the occurrence of unstable healing (OR=8.4, 95% CI=2.4-29.7).Conclusions: A reliable classification for assessing the stability of a healed vertebra was developed. With type I and II healing, the vertebra is considered stable, and the implant can be removed. With type III healing, the vertebra may have healing potential, but the implant should not be removed unless type II healing is achieved. With type IV healing, the vertebra is considered extremely unstable, and instrumentation should be maintained. Assessing the LSC comminution score preoperatively may help to predict unstable healing after surgery.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Healing Pattern Classification for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures after Posterior Short-segment Fixation
Description:
Abstract
Background: Thoracolumbar burst fractures can be treated with posterior short-segment fixation.
However, no classification can help to estimate whether the healed vertebral body will have sufficient stability after implant removal.
We aimed to develop a Healing Pattern Classification (HPC) to evaluate the stability of the healed vertebra based on cavity size and location.
Methods: Fifty-two thoracolumbar burst fracture patients treated with posterior short-segmental fixation without fusion and followed up for an average of 3.
2 years were retrospectively studied.
The HPC was divided into 4 types: type I - no cavity; type II - a small cavity with or without the violation of one endplate; type III - a large cavity with or without the violation of one endplate; and type IV - a burst cavity with the violation of both endplates or the lateral cortical shell.
The intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the HPC were assessed.
The demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes of the cohort were compared between the stable group (types I and II) and the unstable group (types III and IV).
Logistic regression was conducted to evaluate risk factors for unstable healing.
Results: The intraobserver and interobserver ICCs of the HPC were 0.
86 (95% CI=0.
74-0.
90) and 0.
77 (95% CI=0.
59-0.
86), respectively.
While the unstable healing group (types III and IV) accounted for 59.
6% of the patients, most of these patients were asymptomatic.
The preoperative Load Sharing Classification (LSC) comminution score may predict the occurrence of unstable healing (OR=8.
4, 95% CI=2.
4-29.
7).
Conclusions: A reliable classification for assessing the stability of a healed vertebra was developed.
With type I and II healing, the vertebra is considered stable, and the implant can be removed.
With type III healing, the vertebra may have healing potential, but the implant should not be removed unless type II healing is achieved.
With type IV healing, the vertebra is considered extremely unstable, and instrumentation should be maintained.
Assessing the LSC comminution score preoperatively may help to predict unstable healing after surgery.
Related Results
Healing Pattern of Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture after Posterior Short-segmental Fixation
Healing Pattern of Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture after Posterior Short-segmental Fixation
Abstract
Background: Vertebral cavity sometimes occurs after posterior short-segmental fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures, but the risk factor of its formation is u...
Comparison of Two Surgical Approaches to Supination-External Rotation-Type Ankle Fractures
Comparison of Two Surgical Approaches to Supination-External Rotation-Type Ankle Fractures
Objective. To compare the clinical outcome and postoperative complications of the treatment of supination-external rotation-type ankle fractures using the posterolateral approach i...
Third Place Award: Characterization and incidence of occult posterior malleolar fractures
Third Place Award: Characterization and incidence of occult posterior malleolar fractures
Background:
Occult fractures of the posterior malleolus are often missed by primary care providers and radiologists. Delayed treatment of posterior malleolar fractures ...
COMPARATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE DANIS-WEBER, AO, LAUGE HANSEN AND DIAS-TACHDJIAN CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR ANKLE FRACTURES
COMPARATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE DANIS-WEBER, AO, LAUGE HANSEN AND DIAS-TACHDJIAN CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR ANKLE FRACTURES
Introduction: Ankle fractures are very common in emergency departments around the world. Through time and scientific advances, several means of classification have been structured ...
The Karir-joshi Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures
The Karir-joshi Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures
Abstract
Objective:
This study aims to evaluate the relationship between neurological deficits and thoracolumbar fractures using the AO (Magerl) classification. It seeks to...
FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, ANATOMICAL DESCRIPTION, MECHANISM OF ACTION, CLASSIFICATION, CLINICAL EVALUATION, IMAGING EVALUATION, TREATMENT AND COMPLICATIONS
FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, ANATOMICAL DESCRIPTION, MECHANISM OF ACTION, CLASSIFICATION, CLINICAL EVALUATION, IMAGING EVALUATION, TREATMENT AND COMPLICATIONS
Introduction: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are frequent and devastating injuries in orthopedics and traumatology. It usually has several therapeutic options depending on the type o...
Patterns and Treatment Modalities of Maxillofacial Fractures due to Motorcycle Accidents
Patterns and Treatment Modalities of Maxillofacial Fractures due to Motorcycle Accidents
Aim: Maxillofacial fractures due to motorbike accidents are common in Pakistan. The aim of current study was to evaluate the pattern of fractures in motorbike accidents and the com...
Observational study of short-segment pedicle screw fixation for dorsolumbar spine injury
Observational study of short-segment pedicle screw fixation for dorsolumbar spine injury
Background:
Traumatic injury of dorsolumbar spine is one of the most common sites of spinal injuries because of its location between rigid kyphotic thoracic and mobile ...

