Javascript must be enabled to continue!
THE LGBTQI+ UNDER THE ROME STATUTE AND THE PROSPECTS OF THE STATUTE’S UNIVERSAL RATIFICATION
View through CrossRef
Since the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court (ICC), came into force in July 2002, it has been ratified or acceded to by 125 states at present. These numbers have been fluctuating due to many factors, among others, for its universal ratification and its jurisdiction. Article 7(3) of the Rome Statute defines the term “gender” to be only male and female, but the Office of the ICC Prosecutor came out with a number of Policies on “Gender-Based Crimes” to broaden such a definition to also include LGBTQI+ persons as part of its definition. Based on the doctrinal analysis, this paper argues that to legally recognise LGBTQI+ persons under the term “gender”, it must be amended and approved by the Assembly of the State Parties to the Rome Statute and ratified by the State Parties in accordance with Part 11 and Article 121 of the Rome Statute. This paper concludes that such recognition, if succeeds, will hinder universal ratification or accession to the Rome Statute since many countries, both Parties and non-State Parties to the Rome Statute have not legally recognised LGBTQI+ persons under their respective laws.
Title: THE LGBTQI+ UNDER THE ROME STATUTE AND THE PROSPECTS OF THE STATUTE’S UNIVERSAL RATIFICATION
Description:
Since the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court (ICC), came into force in July 2002, it has been ratified or acceded to by 125 states at present.
These numbers have been fluctuating due to many factors, among others, for its universal ratification and its jurisdiction.
Article 7(3) of the Rome Statute defines the term “gender” to be only male and female, but the Office of the ICC Prosecutor came out with a number of Policies on “Gender-Based Crimes” to broaden such a definition to also include LGBTQI+ persons as part of its definition.
Based on the doctrinal analysis, this paper argues that to legally recognise LGBTQI+ persons under the term “gender”, it must be amended and approved by the Assembly of the State Parties to the Rome Statute and ratified by the State Parties in accordance with Part 11 and Article 121 of the Rome Statute.
This paper concludes that such recognition, if succeeds, will hinder universal ratification or accession to the Rome Statute since many countries, both Parties and non-State Parties to the Rome Statute have not legally recognised LGBTQI+ persons under their respective laws.
Related Results
Identity abuse against sexual and gender minority communities: The Being LGBTQI+ in Ireland study
Identity abuse against sexual and gender minority communities: The Being LGBTQI+ in Ireland study
Identity abuse targets people on the basis of immutable characteristics, and has the potential to cause greater emotional and psychological distress for this reason. People with mu...
Feminism and LGBTQI+ Rights in Catholic Scout Youth Movement: Navigating among Identities
Feminism and LGBTQI+ Rights in Catholic Scout Youth Movement: Navigating among Identities
In this paper we examine the advancement of feminist and pro-LGBTQI+ ideals within the Italian Scout movement. This context provides a unique lens to test the interplay between tra...
The Crisis of the Criminal Statute of Limitations and its Effects:The Abu Salim Prison Case as a Model
The Crisis of the Criminal Statute of Limitations and its Effects:The Abu Salim Prison Case as a Model
Among the most significant crises facing criminal law is the issue of whether or not the statute of limitations exists. This statute of limitations is based on the notion that crim...
TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS AND CHALLENGES IN SUPPORTING LGBTQI LEARNERS IN RURAL SECONDARY SCHOOLS
TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS AND CHALLENGES IN SUPPORTING LGBTQI LEARNERS IN RURAL SECONDARY SCHOOLS
This study explores the perceptions and challenges faced by secondary school teachers in supporting LGBTQI learners within the Nongoma Circuit in South Africa. Adopting a phenomeno...
INCORPORATING THE ROME STATUTE INTO NATIONAL LAW: LESSONS FOR MALAYSIA
INCORPORATING THE ROME STATUTE INTO NATIONAL LAW: LESSONS FOR MALAYSIA
Although the former Malaysian government, due to political pressure, decided not to proceed with accession to the Rome Statute, this is not the end of the game. To join the Rome St...
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
Ukraine's contemporary legal system is undergoing a period of significant transformation, which necessitates not only a robust and stable legal framework, but also a flexible doctr...
Malaysia and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Malaysia and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Through its founding treaty, the Rome Statute, the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has received support and opposition from many countries. Despite working ...
TEACHERS’ STRATEGIES FOR DEALING WITH LGBTQI LEARNERS AT SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN THE NONGOMA CIRCUIT
TEACHERS’ STRATEGIES FOR DEALING WITH LGBTQI LEARNERS AT SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN THE NONGOMA CIRCUIT
This study examined secondary school teachers' perceptions of LGBTQI learners within the Nongoma Circuit, focusing on the interactions between teachers and LGBTQI students and iden...

