Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

How We Can Regulate Stablecoins Now-Without Congressional Action

View through CrossRef
<div> <p>This White Paper presents a proposal for federal regulation of stablecoins under existing law. Following the recommendations of the 2021 President’s Working Group’s Stablecoin Report, we propose the creation of a federal framework for the issuance of stablecoins within the regulatory framework for insured depository institutions. Under current law, the Comptroller of the Currency could authorize a national trust bank charter, organized as an operating subsidiary of an insured depository institution, to create stablecoins through the use of a dedicated trust vehicle. With our proposal, the Comptroller would also adopt standards limiting the investment of stablecoin reserves to high quality assets and address redemptions and operational resilience, among other matters. The creation of this federal regulatory structure puts the “stable” in stablecoins, offering consumers a far higher level of protection than the state-level regulatory frameworks that currently govern most stablecoin issuers while providing protection against financial stability risks should the stablecoin market continue to grow. Our approach could promote increased competition in payments services and potentially safeguard the role of the dollar in international finance. While our framework would not be mandatory, we believe our approach would provide substantial benefits to stablecoin sponsors, increasing the likelihood that they would opt into the framework.</p> <p><span>Although new legislation is not needed, coordination across government agencies would be necessary to implement our recommendations effectively. The federal banking agencies—the Federal Reserve Board, the OCC, and the FDIC—would all have to support this stablecoin framework and buy-in from both the SEC and CFTC would be highly desirable. We recommend that a working group of the Financial Stability Oversight Council quarterback this coordination. Our proposal is self-consciously incremental and cautious, imposing stringent and overlapping safeguards and preserving the separation of banking and commerce. If successful, our proposal might later be liberalized in a variety of ways. The experience gained in developing our approach could also be useful in drafting more comprehensive legislation.&nbsp; &nbsp;</span></p> </div>
Title: How We Can Regulate Stablecoins Now-Without Congressional Action
Description:
<div> <p>This White Paper presents a proposal for federal regulation of stablecoins under existing law.
Following the recommendations of the 2021 President’s Working Group’s Stablecoin Report, we propose the creation of a federal framework for the issuance of stablecoins within the regulatory framework for insured depository institutions.
Under current law, the Comptroller of the Currency could authorize a national trust bank charter, organized as an operating subsidiary of an insured depository institution, to create stablecoins through the use of a dedicated trust vehicle.
With our proposal, the Comptroller would also adopt standards limiting the investment of stablecoin reserves to high quality assets and address redemptions and operational resilience, among other matters.
The creation of this federal regulatory structure puts the “stable” in stablecoins, offering consumers a far higher level of protection than the state-level regulatory frameworks that currently govern most stablecoin issuers while providing protection against financial stability risks should the stablecoin market continue to grow.
Our approach could promote increased competition in payments services and potentially safeguard the role of the dollar in international finance.
While our framework would not be mandatory, we believe our approach would provide substantial benefits to stablecoin sponsors, increasing the likelihood that they would opt into the framework.
</p> <p><span>Although new legislation is not needed, coordination across government agencies would be necessary to implement our recommendations effectively.
The federal banking agencies—the Federal Reserve Board, the OCC, and the FDIC—would all have to support this stablecoin framework and buy-in from both the SEC and CFTC would be highly desirable.
We recommend that a working group of the Financial Stability Oversight Council quarterback this coordination.
Our proposal is self-consciously incremental and cautious, imposing stringent and overlapping safeguards and preserving the separation of banking and commerce.
If successful, our proposal might later be liberalized in a variety of ways.
The experience gained in developing our approach could also be useful in drafting more comprehensive legislation.
&nbsp; &nbsp;</span></p> </div>.

Related Results

Stablecoins: Mechanisms, Applications, and Regulation
Stablecoins: Mechanisms, Applications, and Regulation
As a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a stable value, stablecoins have been attracting more and more attention over the last decade, particularly due to their low cost a...
Leveraging Ponzi-like Designs in Stablecoins
Leveraging Ponzi-like Designs in Stablecoins
Stablecoin is a medium of exchange with stable value in the world of decentralized finance (DeFi). In which, algorithmic stablecoins are one special type of stablecoins that are no...
Schweizer Kryptoregulierung: Gesetzgeberischer Handlungsbedarf im Zivil- und Aufsichtsrecht
Schweizer Kryptoregulierung: Gesetzgeberischer Handlungsbedarf im Zivil- und Aufsichtsrecht
Die rechtliche Einordnung von Kryptowerten ist in der Schweiz noch nicht abgeschlossen. Damit die Schweiz für den Markt rund um Kryptowerte attraktiv bleibt, sind zum einen die ziv...
THE IMPACT OF STABLECOINS ON GLOBAL FINANCE
THE IMPACT OF STABLECOINS ON GLOBAL FINANCE
Stablecoins represent a rapidly growing segment of the cryptocurrency market, aiming to overcome the high volatility of cryptocurrencies. Their primary goal is maintaining a stable...
Stablecoins in the USA: Politics, Markets, and Rules
Stablecoins in the USA: Politics, Markets, and Rules
<span><span>We examine how stablecoins moved from the periphery of cryptocurrency markets and regulatory scrutiny to becoming the centerpiece of strongly bipartisan U.S...
L'Action, synthèse de l'être : analyse de l'Action de Maurice Blondel à la lumière du "vinculum substantiale" de Leibniz
L'Action, synthèse de l'être : analyse de l'Action de Maurice Blondel à la lumière du "vinculum substantiale" de Leibniz
Notre thèse veut montrer que l’Action est une synthèse de l’être. L’action ici est entendue dans la perspective de Blondel qui montre - dans sa thèse française, l’Action de 1893, e...
The Four Types of Stablecoins: A Comparative Analysis
The Four Types of Stablecoins: A Comparative Analysis
Stablecoins have gained significant popularity recently, with their market cap rising to over $180 billion. However, recent events have raised concerns about their stability. In th...
Stablecoins vs. Tokenized Deposits: The Narrow Banking Debate Revisited
Stablecoins vs. Tokenized Deposits: The Narrow Banking Debate Revisited
We study how the type of money used in blockchain-based trade affects interest rates, investment, and welfare. Stablecoins in our model are backed by safe assets, while banks issue...

Back to Top