Javascript must be enabled to continue!
2482-P: Metabolic Obesity Phenotypes and Advanced Liver Fibrosis: A Cross-Sectional Transient Elastography Study
View through CrossRef
Introduction and Objective: Body mass index (BMI) alone may miss obesity risk; ICMR-INDIAB study supports metabolic phenotyping into four groups based on their metabolic and BMI status: metabolically healthy non-obese (MHNO), metabolically obese non-obese (MONO), metabolically obese obese (MOO), and metabolically healthy obese (MHO). We assessed phenotype distribution and association with liver fibrosis stage using MHNO as a reference.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of an adult cohort with complete demographic, anthropometric, and biochemical profiles, all of whom underwent vibration-controlled transient elastography. The participants were categorized into four groups as per the ICMR-INDIAB study. Fibrosis staging was determined via liver stiffness measurement (advanced fibrosis > 9.5 kPa). We analyzed the demographic data, sex distribution, and fibrosis staging across categories. Odds ratios (ORs) for advanced fibrosis were calculated using MHNO as the baseline, applying Haldane-Anscombe continuity corrections where necessary.
Results: In this cross-sectional cohort of 349 adults (mean age 51.1±11.1 years; 47.3% men), metabolic obesity phenotypes were MHNO n=74 (21.2%), MONO, n=101 (28.9%), MHO, n=2 (0.6%), and MOO, n=172 (49.3%). Advanced fibrosis occurred in 52.9% of participants with MOO (91/172) and in 1/2 with MHO, but in 0/74 with MHNO and 0/101 with MONO. Compared with MHNO, MOO had markedly higher odds of advanced fibrosis (crude OR ∞; Haldane-Anscombe-corrected OR ≈167, 95% CI ≈10.2-2743; p<0.001). In fibrosis staging, MHNO and MONO were entirely F0-F1 (<7.0 kPa), whereas MOO was predominantly ≥F2 (F2 44.2%, F3 23.8%, F4 31.4%).
Conclusion: In this pioneer study with people with diabetes, we found advanced fibrosis on transient elastography was concentrated in metabolically unhealthy obesity, with none observed in non-obesity groups. Combining metabolic risk status with obesity classification may help target fibrosis screening and risk-reduction efforts.
Disclosure
A. Tewari: None. J. Tewari: None. V. Tewari: None. N. Verma: None. A. Maheshwari: None.
American Diabetes Association
Title: 2482-P: Metabolic Obesity Phenotypes and Advanced Liver Fibrosis: A Cross-Sectional Transient Elastography Study
Description:
Introduction and Objective: Body mass index (BMI) alone may miss obesity risk; ICMR-INDIAB study supports metabolic phenotyping into four groups based on their metabolic and BMI status: metabolically healthy non-obese (MHNO), metabolically obese non-obese (MONO), metabolically obese obese (MOO), and metabolically healthy obese (MHO).
We assessed phenotype distribution and association with liver fibrosis stage using MHNO as a reference.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of an adult cohort with complete demographic, anthropometric, and biochemical profiles, all of whom underwent vibration-controlled transient elastography.
The participants were categorized into four groups as per the ICMR-INDIAB study.
Fibrosis staging was determined via liver stiffness measurement (advanced fibrosis > 9.
5 kPa).
We analyzed the demographic data, sex distribution, and fibrosis staging across categories.
Odds ratios (ORs) for advanced fibrosis were calculated using MHNO as the baseline, applying Haldane-Anscombe continuity corrections where necessary.
Results: In this cross-sectional cohort of 349 adults (mean age 51.
1±11.
1 years; 47.
3% men), metabolic obesity phenotypes were MHNO n=74 (21.
2%), MONO, n=101 (28.
9%), MHO, n=2 (0.
6%), and MOO, n=172 (49.
3%).
Advanced fibrosis occurred in 52.
9% of participants with MOO (91/172) and in 1/2 with MHO, but in 0/74 with MHNO and 0/101 with MONO.
Compared with MHNO, MOO had markedly higher odds of advanced fibrosis (crude OR ∞; Haldane-Anscombe-corrected OR ≈167, 95% CI ≈10.
2-2743; p<0.
001).
In fibrosis staging, MHNO and MONO were entirely F0-F1 (<7.
0 kPa), whereas MOO was predominantly ≥F2 (F2 44.
2%, F3 23.
8%, F4 31.
4%).
Conclusion: In this pioneer study with people with diabetes, we found advanced fibrosis on transient elastography was concentrated in metabolically unhealthy obesity, with none observed in non-obesity groups.
Combining metabolic risk status with obesity classification may help target fibrosis screening and risk-reduction efforts.
Disclosure
A.
Tewari: None.
J.
Tewari: None.
V.
Tewari: None.
N.
Verma: None.
A.
Maheshwari: None.
Related Results
[RETRACTED] Bridport Health Reviews - Powerfully Detoxifies The Liver, Lose Liver Fat And Improve Gut Health! v1
[RETRACTED] Bridport Health Reviews - Powerfully Detoxifies The Liver, Lose Liver Fat And Improve Gut Health! v1
[RETRACTED]Product Name - Bridport Health Ingredients - Milk Thistle, Beetroot, Artichoke Extract & More. Category - Liver Support Supplement Main Benefits - Helps Protect The ...
[RETRACTED] Bridport Health Liver Support Does It Really Work v1
[RETRACTED] Bridport Health Liver Support Does It Really Work v1
[RETRACTED]Depiction • Where to Get Bottle Online –Click Here • Item Name -Bridport Health Liver • Aftereffects - No Major Side Effects • Classification - Health • Accessibility -O...
Modern Principles of Liver Fibrosis Diagnosis in Patients With Chronic Diffuse Liver Lesions: Literature Review and Clinical Case Description
Modern Principles of Liver Fibrosis Diagnosis in Patients With Chronic Diffuse Liver Lesions: Literature Review and Clinical Case Description
Introduction. Chronic diffuse liver lesions, which is at a certain stage and phase of the disease characterized by excessive accumulation of components of the extracellular matrix,...
Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography of liver as a screening tool for liver fibrosis in alcoholic liver disease
Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography of liver as a screening tool for liver fibrosis in alcoholic liver disease
AbstractContext: Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography is a noninvasive and quantitative technique for diagnosis of liver fibrosis. To the best of our knowledge, the...
P0364 MR Elastography Characterizing Biomechanical Properties to Enhance Enterographic Fibrosis Diagnosis
P0364 MR Elastography Characterizing Biomechanical Properties to Enhance Enterographic Fibrosis Diagnosis
Abstract
Background
Current diagnostic tools for fibrosis assessment in Crohn’s disease (CD) remain suboptimal.[1] MR ela...
CORRELATION BETWEEN SERUM LIVER ENZYMES AND FIBROSIS SEVERITY IN NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE (NAFLD) PATIENTS. A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
CORRELATION BETWEEN SERUM LIVER ENZYMES AND FIBROSIS SEVERITY IN NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE (NAFLD) PATIENTS. A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Background: One of the major chronic liver diseases in the world is NAFLD which tends to start as mere steatosis but tends to evolve into fibrosis and cirrhosis. Serum liver enzyme...
From liver biopsy to non-invasive markers in evaluating fibrosis in chronic liver disease
From liver biopsy to non-invasive markers in evaluating fibrosis in chronic liver disease
Chronic liver disease is a late stage of progressive hepatic fibrosis. It consists of functional and structural disruptions in most chronic liver diseases. An accurate diagnosis al...
Metabolic puzzle: Exploring liver fibrosis differences in Asian metabolic-associated fatty liver disease subtypes
Metabolic puzzle: Exploring liver fibrosis differences in Asian metabolic-associated fatty liver disease subtypes
BACKGROUND
Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a liver condition marked by excessive fat buildup in the absence of heavy alcohol use. It is primarily link...

