Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Record Linkage With Washington State Cancer Registry
View through CrossRef
Background/Aims: At Group Health, the virtual data warehouse’s (VDW) tumor registry table consists of tumor cases ascertained by Cancer Surveillance System (CSS) at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC). This data is limited to residents of 13 Puget Sound counties in the SEER region only. On the other hand, Washington State Cancer Registry (WSCR) consists of tumor cases for the entire Washington State residents. The poster describes the data linkage protocol and the results of linkage of Group Health members with WSCR database in the absence of unique identifier.
Methods: Group Health data consists of 1,420,334 members residing in Washington State. We linked Group Health data with WSCR database consisting of 613,631 cancer cases diagnosed during January 1, 1993–December 31, 2011. We used a probabilistic linkage software application such as CDC’s Registry Plus Link Plus® to link patient information such social security number, date of birth, gender, and last and first names with corresponding data elements in WSCR. We assessed the quality of the linkage results by comparing the linkage outcome with VDW’s tumor registry. We calculated the sensitivity and positive predictive value by comparing the WSCR linkage results with VDW’s tumor registry. We used Venn diagrams for visualization of results of comparison.
Results: Sensitivity and positive predictive value are 90% and 96%, respectively. We found 35,166 (59%) additional tumor cases as a result of WSCR linkage in comparison to the VDW tumor registry. Of the above, 21,600 (61%) tumor cases were reported within SEER region and 13,566 (39%) cases diagnosed in members residing outside of Puget Sound region. Of 21,600 SEER cases, 17,248 (88%) tumor cases were diagnosed after disenrollment from Group Health, and 2,090 SEER cases were found missing from VDW’s tumor registry. Due to lack of interpretable information, we were unsuccessful in linking 5,752 records in the VDW tumor registry with WSCR data.
Discussion: In the absence of unique identifier, the project demonstrates a successful linkage using Link Plus. We now have cancer incidence and survival data for all Group Health members, not limited to Puget Sound region. This will augment cancer studies involving members from both SEER region and outside of Puget Sound counties.
Title: Record Linkage With Washington State Cancer Registry
Description:
Background/Aims: At Group Health, the virtual data warehouse’s (VDW) tumor registry table consists of tumor cases ascertained by Cancer Surveillance System (CSS) at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC).
This data is limited to residents of 13 Puget Sound counties in the SEER region only.
On the other hand, Washington State Cancer Registry (WSCR) consists of tumor cases for the entire Washington State residents.
The poster describes the data linkage protocol and the results of linkage of Group Health members with WSCR database in the absence of unique identifier.
Methods: Group Health data consists of 1,420,334 members residing in Washington State.
We linked Group Health data with WSCR database consisting of 613,631 cancer cases diagnosed during January 1, 1993–December 31, 2011.
We used a probabilistic linkage software application such as CDC’s Registry Plus Link Plus® to link patient information such social security number, date of birth, gender, and last and first names with corresponding data elements in WSCR.
We assessed the quality of the linkage results by comparing the linkage outcome with VDW’s tumor registry.
We calculated the sensitivity and positive predictive value by comparing the WSCR linkage results with VDW’s tumor registry.
We used Venn diagrams for visualization of results of comparison.
Results: Sensitivity and positive predictive value are 90% and 96%, respectively.
We found 35,166 (59%) additional tumor cases as a result of WSCR linkage in comparison to the VDW tumor registry.
Of the above, 21,600 (61%) tumor cases were reported within SEER region and 13,566 (39%) cases diagnosed in members residing outside of Puget Sound region.
Of 21,600 SEER cases, 17,248 (88%) tumor cases were diagnosed after disenrollment from Group Health, and 2,090 SEER cases were found missing from VDW’s tumor registry.
Due to lack of interpretable information, we were unsuccessful in linking 5,752 records in the VDW tumor registry with WSCR data.
Discussion: In the absence of unique identifier, the project demonstrates a successful linkage using Link Plus.
We now have cancer incidence and survival data for all Group Health members, not limited to Puget Sound region.
This will augment cancer studies involving members from both SEER region and outside of Puget Sound counties.
Related Results
Black Wax(ing): On Gil Scott-Heron and the Walking Interlude
Black Wax(ing): On Gil Scott-Heron and the Walking Interlude
The film opens in an unidentified wax museum. The camera pans from right to left, zooming in on key Black historical figures who have been memorialized in wax. W.E.B. Du Bois, Mari...
Abstract 1341: Identification of significant linkage evidence for lethal prostate cancer on chromosome arm 11p15.
Abstract 1341: Identification of significant linkage evidence for lethal prostate cancer on chromosome arm 11p15.
Abstract
We performed genome wide linkage analysis in a set of high-risk prostate cancer pedigrees, each with 3 or more sampled cases whose death certificate indicat...
A Density-Adaptive Hybrid Linkage Criterion for Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering
A Density-Adaptive Hybrid Linkage Criterion for Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering
Hierarchical clustering is a widely used unsupervised learning technique due to its ability to uncover nested data structures without requiring prior knowledge of the number of clu...
Italian Ornithological Commission (COI) - Report 30
Italian Ornithological Commission (COI) - Report 30
Italian Ornithological Commission (COI) - Report 30. This report refers to records from January 1st 2020 to December 31st 2021, with the addition of a number of records from previo...
Evaluation measure for group-based record linkage
Evaluation measure for group-based record linkage
Introduction The robustness of record linkage evaluation measures is of high importance since linkage techniques are assessed based on these. However, minimal research has been con...
Description of the international consortium for prostate cancer genetics, and failure to replicate linkage of hereditary prostate cancer to 20q13
Description of the international consortium for prostate cancer genetics, and failure to replicate linkage of hereditary prostate cancer to 20q13
AbstractThe International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics (ICPCG) is an international collaborative effort to pool pedigrees with hereditary prostate cancer (PC) in order t...
Abstract OT-11-01: The informed genetics annotated patient registry: The iGAP registry
Abstract OT-11-01: The informed genetics annotated patient registry: The iGAP registry
Abstract
Background
Interest and knowledge about the genetics and biology of inherited risk of and progression of disease is growing. Physicians are i...
Diagnostic Rate of the Cancer by BDORT Utilizing the Cancer Slide
Diagnostic Rate of the Cancer by BDORT Utilizing the Cancer Slide
Purpose:
To make a diagnosis of cancer with BDORT (resonance test), we can choose two methods. One is to use a chemical agent like Integrin α5β1 or Oncogene C-f...

