Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

An attempt to prove Riemann

View through CrossRef
Th is an attempt to formally prove Riemann’s hypothesis (RH) related to the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann- Euler Zeta function, which are postulated by the hypothesis to lie on the critical line σ = 1/2. This paper depends on chapter 1 and chapter 2 from H.M. Edwards’ book “Riemann Zeta function” and it provides three different proofs of RH, all these proofs start from the somehow modified Xi function ξ(x), which is defined based on the functional equation of the Zeta function, separates it into real u(σ,t) and imaginary v(σ,t) parts, then equates both of them to zero and investigates the behavior of the resulting pair of equations u(σ,t) = 0 and v(σ,t) =0. The first proof investigates the algebraic and geometric structure of the Zeta function non-trivial zeros as dictated by the functional equation, using fundamental concepts from complex algebra and analytic geometry usually taught in high schools, the second proof simply depends on studying the validity of equality relation in the pair of equations u(σ,t) = 0 and v(σ,t) =0 in certain regions covering the whole plane and focusing on the critical strip. These regions are constructed based on a hyperbola relating σ and t and it results from rationalization of the equation u(σ,t) = 0. The last proof utilizes fundamental concepts from infinite series and products of trigonometric and hyperbolic functions to prove Riemann’s hypothesis.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: An attempt to prove Riemann
Description:
Th is an attempt to formally prove Riemann’s hypothesis (RH) related to the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann- Euler Zeta function, which are postulated by the hypothesis to lie on the critical line σ = 1/2.
This paper depends on chapter 1 and chapter 2 from H.
M.
Edwards’ book “Riemann Zeta function” and it provides three different proofs of RH, all these proofs start from the somehow modified Xi function ξ(x), which is defined based on the functional equation of the Zeta function, separates it into real u(σ,t) and imaginary v(σ,t) parts, then equates both of them to zero and investigates the behavior of the resulting pair of equations u(σ,t) = 0 and v(σ,t) =0.
The first proof investigates the algebraic and geometric structure of the Zeta function non-trivial zeros as dictated by the functional equation, using fundamental concepts from complex algebra and analytic geometry usually taught in high schools, the second proof simply depends on studying the validity of equality relation in the pair of equations u(σ,t) = 0 and v(σ,t) =0 in certain regions covering the whole plane and focusing on the critical strip.
These regions are constructed based on a hyperbola relating σ and t and it results from rationalization of the equation u(σ,t) = 0.
The last proof utilizes fundamental concepts from infinite series and products of trigonometric and hyperbolic functions to prove Riemann’s hypothesis.

Related Results

Log-Riemann surfaces and Liouville Towers
Log-Riemann surfaces and Liouville Towers
Log-surfaces de Riemann et Tours de Liouville Dans cette thèse, nous étudions géométriquement certaines classes de fonctions par l'étude des log-surfaces de Riemann...
Riemann hypothesis equivalences,Robin inequality,Lagarias criterion, and Riemann hypothesis
Riemann hypothesis equivalences,Robin inequality,Lagarias criterion, and Riemann hypothesis
In this paper, we briefly review most of accomplished research in Riemann Zeta function and Riemann hypothesis since Riemann's age including Riemann hypothesis equivalences as well...
Riemann hypothesis equivalences,Robin inequality,Lagarias criterion, and Riemann hypothesis
Riemann hypothesis equivalences,Robin inequality,Lagarias criterion, and Riemann hypothesis
In this paper, we briefly review most of accomplished research in Riemann Zeta function and Riemann hypothesis since Riemann's age including Riemann hypothesis equivalences as well...
A topological proof of the Riemann–Hurwitz formula
A topological proof of the Riemann–Hurwitz formula
The Riemann–Hurwitz formula is generally given as a result from algebraic geometry that provides a means of constraining branched covers of surfaces via their Euler characteristic....
Monodromías geométricas en familias de curvas de género 4
Monodromías geométricas en familias de curvas de género 4
The goal of the thesis is the effective computation of the geometric monodromy, equivalently the monodromy in the fundamental group, for families of compact connected Riemann surfa...
Renormalized volume, Polyakov anomaly, and orbifold Riemann surfaces
Renormalized volume, Polyakov anomaly, and orbifold Riemann surfaces
In [B. Taghavi Classical Liouville action and uniformization of orbifold Riemann surfaces, ], two of the authors studied the function ????m=Sm−π∑i=1n(mi−1mi)loghi for orbifold Rie...
The Riemann Hypothesis Is Possibly True
The Riemann Hypothesis Is Possibly True
In mathematics, the Riemann hypothesis is a conjecture that the Riemann zeta function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part $\frac{1}{...
The concentration and cavitation in the Riemann solution for non-homogeneous logrithmic equation of state with magnetic field
The concentration and cavitation in the Riemann solution for non-homogeneous logrithmic equation of state with magnetic field
In the present study, the phenomena of concentration and cavitation in the Riemann solution for the non-homogeneous hyperbolic system with logarithmic equation of state and magneti...

Back to Top