Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Gastroenterologist’s View
View through CrossRef
The traditional view that recurrent episodes of diverticulitis lead to progressively complicated disease resulting in a disadvantageous course, more difficult, complicated operations and lethal outcomes did not stand the test of evidence. Only a minority of patients with acute diverticulitis will ever require surgery, and if so, this occurs during or early after the first episode. Complications and recurrence of disease after surgery are enumerable. Strong indicators favoring sigmoid colectomy are major abscess, free air, and fistula, i.e. perforating disease. This occurs predominantly at the initial presentation, frequently in younger or immunosuppressed patients. Important differential diagnoses must be considered both for initial diagnosis of diverticulitis and for recurrent episodes. Conservative management of recurrent diverticulitis is safe and best guided by gastroenterological expertise. Sophisticated ultrasound experience as a part of this competence allows detailed evaluation of the local status and the best evidence in the literature for diagnosing diverticulitis is on US. In practice, however, the question of perforating diverticulitis is adequately answered by subtle CT scan. Medical therapy is usually the treatment of choice for recurrent diverticulitis. Avoidance of drugs bearing the hazard of perforation (e.g. NSAIDs) is emphasized, and smoking is strongly discouraged. A mathematical model based on published data shows that patients with recurrent diverticulitis overall (only) profit from surgery if they are hit by four episodes during the course of disease. This is where theory and reality (should) meet.
Title: The Gastroenterologist’s View
Description:
The traditional view that recurrent episodes of diverticulitis lead to progressively complicated disease resulting in a disadvantageous course, more difficult, complicated operations and lethal outcomes did not stand the test of evidence.
Only a minority of patients with acute diverticulitis will ever require surgery, and if so, this occurs during or early after the first episode.
Complications and recurrence of disease after surgery are enumerable.
Strong indicators favoring sigmoid colectomy are major abscess, free air, and fistula, i.
e.
perforating disease.
This occurs predominantly at the initial presentation, frequently in younger or immunosuppressed patients.
Important differential diagnoses must be considered both for initial diagnosis of diverticulitis and for recurrent episodes.
Conservative management of recurrent diverticulitis is safe and best guided by gastroenterological expertise.
Sophisticated ultrasound experience as a part of this competence allows detailed evaluation of the local status and the best evidence in the literature for diagnosing diverticulitis is on US.
In practice, however, the question of perforating diverticulitis is adequately answered by subtle CT scan.
Medical therapy is usually the treatment of choice for recurrent diverticulitis.
Avoidance of drugs bearing the hazard of perforation (e.
g.
NSAIDs) is emphasized, and smoking is strongly discouraged.
A mathematical model based on published data shows that patients with recurrent diverticulitis overall (only) profit from surgery if they are hit by four episodes during the course of disease.
This is where theory and reality (should) meet.
Related Results
A comparison using standardized measures for patients with irritable bowel syndrome: Trust in the gastroenterologist and reliance on the internet
A comparison using standardized measures for patients with irritable bowel syndrome: Trust in the gastroenterologist and reliance on the internet
AbstractBackgroundIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients’ use of the Internet for health information interacts with the way they trust their gastroenterologist. No standardized me...
Volume 10, Index
Volume 10, Index
<p><strong>Vol 10, No 1 (2015)</strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><a href="http://www.world-education-center.org/index...
Comparison of 2 Hours Fasting with Conventional 8 Hours Fasting Before Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Comparison of 2 Hours Fasting with Conventional 8 Hours Fasting Before Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Endoscopy is performed in routine to diagnose gastrointestinal diseases. Usually, a patient has fast for 8 hours fast before undergoing endoscopy. But it has also been observed tha...
Transoesophageal examination
Transoesophageal examination
This chapter deals with transoesophageal examination. It covers indications; contraindications and complications; information for the patient; preparing for the study; preparing an...
Patients' values and preferences regarding endoscopic therapy for Barrett's esophagus: A cross‐sectional survey study
Patients' values and preferences regarding endoscopic therapy for Barrett's esophagus: A cross‐sectional survey study
AbstractIntroductionEndoscopic eradication therapy (EET) has evolved as a minimally invasive and efficacious option to treat patients with dysplastic Barret's esophagus. We aimed t...
P071 COVID-19 Ethics and Gastroenterology
P071 COVID-19 Ethics and Gastroenterology
BACKGROUND:
Ethical principles in the field of medicine have become increasingly relevant during the COVID-19 pandemic, during which practitioners are required to provi...
Bridging the gap in gastrointestinal healthcare in a resource-limited setup: Feasibility study of weekend endoscopy services in Southwest Ethiopia
Bridging the gap in gastrointestinal healthcare in a resource-limited setup: Feasibility study of weekend endoscopy services in Southwest Ethiopia
AbstractEndoscopy is essential for diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal disorders. However, its accessibility in Africa is limited by the need for extensive training and co...
Transthoracic examination
Transthoracic examination
This chapter covers all aspects of transthoracic examination, including patient information, preparing machine and probe, probe handling and image quality, 2D image acquisition, 3D...

