Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Late Triassic‐Early Jurassic abnormal thermal event constrained by zircon fission track dating and vitrinite reflectance in Xishan coalfield, Qinshui Basin, central North China

View through CrossRef
Xishan coalfield, Shanxi, is located in the northwest of the Qinshui Basin, central North China. It is notable for its varieties of coal rank ranging from high volatile bituminous coals to anthracite as well as having abundant coalbed methane resources. Zircon fission track (ZFT) analyses were carried out on the zircons in 2 Upper Carboniferous and 5 Lower‐Middle Permian sandstones, and vitrinite reflectance of Late Carboniferous and Early Permian coals were measured to determine the timing of thermal events and maximum paleo‐temperatures, which were responsible for coal maturation and coalbed methane generation. Maximum paleo‐temperatures calculated from vitrinite reflectance values reached to about 232 and 223 °C in Late Carboniferous and Early Permian coals, respectively, and the estimated paleo‐temperature gradient was 11.84 °C/100 m, representing an intensive abnormal thermal event. Results of the ZFT dating indicated that 5 samples failed the χ2‐test and 2 samples passed the test. The decomposition results of the 5 samples divided their age populations into 3 periods: (a) older ages (537, 584, and 802 Ma) than sandstones ages, (b) close to or slightly older than their depositional ages (289, 301, and 331 Ma), and (c) younger than the depositional ages (181–215). The 2 samples that passed χ2‐test yield the central ages of 168 ± 7 Ma and 190 ± 8 Ma, respectively, younger than the deposition age. The close to or older ages than the sandstones depositional ages represent the tectonothermal events occurring in their source areas; the younger ages indicate the existence of the postdepositional tectonothermal event. The agreement of the partly annealing temperature zone (210–300 °C) of zircon fission tracks with the calculated maximum paleo‐temperatures from vitrinite reflectance suggests a Late Triassic‐Early Jurassic abnormal thermal event with the formation time of the present coal rank being 181–215 Ma, rather than a unique intrusion at 95–135 Ma on the western margin of coalfield as previously believed. Combined with other ZFT ages regionally, this abnormal event also occurred in the southern as well as the northern parts of the Qinshui Basin. The Late Triassic‐Early Jurassic intensive extension in the North China Craton is the geodynamic setting of this tectonothermal event.
Title: Late Triassic‐Early Jurassic abnormal thermal event constrained by zircon fission track dating and vitrinite reflectance in Xishan coalfield, Qinshui Basin, central North China
Description:
Xishan coalfield, Shanxi, is located in the northwest of the Qinshui Basin, central North China.
It is notable for its varieties of coal rank ranging from high volatile bituminous coals to anthracite as well as having abundant coalbed methane resources.
Zircon fission track (ZFT) analyses were carried out on the zircons in 2 Upper Carboniferous and 5 Lower‐Middle Permian sandstones, and vitrinite reflectance of Late Carboniferous and Early Permian coals were measured to determine the timing of thermal events and maximum paleo‐temperatures, which were responsible for coal maturation and coalbed methane generation.
Maximum paleo‐temperatures calculated from vitrinite reflectance values reached to about 232 and 223 °C in Late Carboniferous and Early Permian coals, respectively, and the estimated paleo‐temperature gradient was 11.
84 °C/100 m, representing an intensive abnormal thermal event.
Results of the ZFT dating indicated that 5 samples failed the χ2‐test and 2 samples passed the test.
The decomposition results of the 5 samples divided their age populations into 3 periods: (a) older ages (537, 584, and 802 Ma) than sandstones ages, (b) close to or slightly older than their depositional ages (289, 301, and 331 Ma), and (c) younger than the depositional ages (181–215).
The 2 samples that passed χ2‐test yield the central ages of 168 ± 7 Ma and 190 ± 8 Ma, respectively, younger than the deposition age.
The close to or older ages than the sandstones depositional ages represent the tectonothermal events occurring in their source areas; the younger ages indicate the existence of the postdepositional tectonothermal event.
The agreement of the partly annealing temperature zone (210–300 °C) of zircon fission tracks with the calculated maximum paleo‐temperatures from vitrinite reflectance suggests a Late Triassic‐Early Jurassic abnormal thermal event with the formation time of the present coal rank being 181–215 Ma, rather than a unique intrusion at 95–135 Ma on the western margin of coalfield as previously believed.
Combined with other ZFT ages regionally, this abnormal event also occurred in the southern as well as the northern parts of the Qinshui Basin.
The Late Triassic‐Early Jurassic intensive extension in the North China Craton is the geodynamic setting of this tectonothermal event.

Related Results

SIMPLE FORMS OF ZIRCON CRYSTALS FROM CRYSTALLINE ROCKS OF THE UKRAINIAN SHIELD AND THEIR MORPHOLOGICAL TYPES
SIMPLE FORMS OF ZIRCON CRYSTALS FROM CRYSTALLINE ROCKS OF THE UKRAINIAN SHIELD AND THEIR MORPHOLOGICAL TYPES
The main basics in geometric crystallography of zircon, developed by many researchers in the 18th - 20th centuries, are briefly described. The data of goniometric study of zircon f...
Zircon – Tiny but Telling: A Petrochronological Study
Zircon – Tiny but Telling: A Petrochronological Study
This thesis concerns the field of petrochronology, where time is linked to the physical conditions (e.g., pressure P and temperature T) of rock-forming events, to provide better co...
FAIR fission track analysis with geochron@home
FAIR fission track analysis with geochron@home
Abstract. Fission track thermochronology is based on the visual analysis of optical images. This visual process is prone to observer bias. Fission track datasets are currently repo...
Tectono-thermal evolution of the Junggar Basin, NW China: constraints from R o and apatite fission track modelling
Tectono-thermal evolution of the Junggar Basin, NW China: constraints from R o and apatite fission track modelling
The thermal evolution of the Junggar Basin, northwest China, was evaluated based on the thermal modelling results of 59 wells by using vitrinite reflectance (R o ...
Successor Characteristics of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic Songliao Basins
Successor Characteristics of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic Songliao Basins
Abstract: The Songliao basin is a complex successor basin that was initiated in the Mesozoic and experienced multiple periods of reactivation. Based on seismic and drilling data, a...
Jurassic Stratigraphy of the Sweet-Grass Arch—Manitoba Section
Jurassic Stratigraphy of the Sweet-Grass Arch—Manitoba Section
Abstract In southern Saskatchewan and Manitoba the interval between the late Paleozoic and late Jurassic epeirogenies is represented in stratigraphic order by contin...
The rise of ginkgoalean plants in the early Mesozoic: a data analysis
The rise of ginkgoalean plants in the early Mesozoic: a data analysis
AbstractIn the present article, ginkgoalean fossil records are analysed and the data are incorporated into a sketched, ‘epoch‐by‐epoch’ framework (e.g. late Triassic, early Jurassi...
Mesozoic‐Cenozoic Basin Features and Evolution of Southeast China
Mesozoic‐Cenozoic Basin Features and Evolution of Southeast China
Abstract: The Late Triassic to Paleogene (T3‐E) basin occupies an area of 143100 km2, being the sixth area of the whole of SE China; the total area of synchronous granitoid is abou...

Back to Top