Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF LUMBAR DISCECTOMY VERSUS CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT IN LUMBAR DISC PROLAPSE: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY

View through CrossRef
Background:Lumbar disc prolapse (LDP) is a common cause of low back pain and radiculopathy, significantly affecting functional capacity and quality of life. Although both surgical and conservative treatments are widely used, the optimal management strategy remains controversial.Objective:To compare the functional outcomes of lumbar discectomy versus conservative management in patients with lumbar disc prolapse.Methods:This prospective comparative study was conducted at Government Dindigul Medical College Hospitalfrom January 2024 to January 2026. A total of 50 patients aged 30–60 years with clinically and radiologically confirmed lumbar disc prolapse were included. Patients were divided into two groups: surgical (lumbar discectomy) and conservative management. Outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional status at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.Results:Both groups showed significant improvement in VAS and ODI scores over time. The surgical group demonstrated significantly greater reduction in pain and disability at early follow-up (6 weeks and 3 months) compared to the conservative group (p < 0.001). However, by 12 months, the difference between groups was not statistically significant (VAS: p = 0.08; ODI: p = 0.06). Patients undergoing surgery returned to work earlier (6.2 ± 1.8 weeks vs 10.4 ± 2.3 weeks; p < 0.001). Minor complications were noted in the surgical group, while a subset of conservatively managed patientsrequired delayed surgical intervention.Conclusion:Lumbar discectomy provides faster pain relief and earlier functional recovery compared to conservative management. However, long-term outcomes are comparable between the two approaches. Treatment should be individualized, with surgery reserved for patients with persistent symptoms or neurological deficits, while conservative management remains effective in selected cases.
Title: FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF LUMBAR DISCECTOMY VERSUS CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT IN LUMBAR DISC PROLAPSE: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY
Description:
Background:Lumbar disc prolapse (LDP) is a common cause of low back pain and radiculopathy, significantly affecting functional capacity and quality of life.
Although both surgical and conservative treatments are widely used, the optimal management strategy remains controversial.
Objective:To compare the functional outcomes of lumbar discectomy versus conservative management in patients with lumbar disc prolapse.
Methods:This prospective comparative study was conducted at Government Dindigul Medical College Hospitalfrom January 2024 to January 2026.
A total of 50 patients aged 30–60 years with clinically and radiologically confirmed lumbar disc prolapse were included.
Patients were divided into two groups: surgical (lumbar discectomy) and conservative management.
Outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional status at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
Results:Both groups showed significant improvement in VAS and ODI scores over time.
The surgical group demonstrated significantly greater reduction in pain and disability at early follow-up (6 weeks and 3 months) compared to the conservative group (p < 0.
001).
However, by 12 months, the difference between groups was not statistically significant (VAS: p = 0.
08; ODI: p = 0.
06).
Patients undergoing surgery returned to work earlier (6.
2 ± 1.
8 weeks vs 10.
4 ± 2.
3 weeks; p < 0.
001).
Minor complications were noted in the surgical group, while a subset of conservatively managed patientsrequired delayed surgical intervention.
Conclusion:Lumbar discectomy provides faster pain relief and earlier functional recovery compared to conservative management.
However, long-term outcomes are comparable between the two approaches.
Treatment should be individualized, with surgery reserved for patients with persistent symptoms or neurological deficits, while conservative management remains effective in selected cases.

Related Results

EPIDEMIOLOGICALRISK FACTORS OF RECURRENCE OF LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC HERNIATION AFTER PRIMARY DISCECTOMY (LITERATURE REVIEW)
EPIDEMIOLOGICALRISK FACTORS OF RECURRENCE OF LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC HERNIATION AFTER PRIMARY DISCECTOMY (LITERATURE REVIEW)
Primary discectomy for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniated (LDH) is usually accompanied by a rapid regression of clinical symptoms, however, in 5–15 % of cases, an X-ray positiv...
Management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a comparative analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and repeat discectomy
Management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a comparative analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and repeat discectomy
Background: For recurrent lumbar disc herniation, many experts suggest a repeat discectomy without stabilization due to its minimal tissue manipulation, lower blood los...
Stand-Alone Open Disectomy versus Fixation in Management of Recurrent Lumbar Disc Prolapse
Stand-Alone Open Disectomy versus Fixation in Management of Recurrent Lumbar Disc Prolapse
Abstract Background The strict definition of recurrent disc herniation is the presence of herniated disc material at the same le...
Functional outcome of lumbar discectomy by fenestration technique in lumbar disc prolapse.
Functional outcome of lumbar discectomy by fenestration technique in lumbar disc prolapse.
Objective: To evaluate the functional recovery, particularly in in terms of pain relief and resuming work, in patients with lumbar disc prolapse treated with the fenestration techn...
Functional outcomes following fenestration discectomy for lumbar disc prolapse: a tertiary care center study from north india
Functional outcomes following fenestration discectomy for lumbar disc prolapse: a tertiary care center study from north india
Background: Lumbar disc herniation causes low back pain and radiculopathy, often leading to significant functional impairment. Fenestration discectomy remains a widely practiced su...

Back to Top