Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat (1689–1755)
View through CrossRef
Montesquieu, one of the greatest figures of the Enlightenment, was famous in his own century both in France and in foreign lands, from Russia to the American colonies. Later generations of French philosophes took for granted his concern to reform the criminal laws, to replace the Inquisition with a reign of tolerance, and to repudiate the vicious conquests of the Spaniards in the Americas. They also accepted his finding that Protestant, commercial, and constitutionalist England and Holland represented all the best possibilities of Europe; whereas Catholic, economically backward, and politically absolutist Portugal and Spain represented the worst of the Western world and constituted a warning to the French.
Although the findings and specific reforms proposed by Montesquieu were repeated by many another figure of the French Enlightenment, his work in certain respects remained unique in the circles of the most advanced thinkers. In his efforts to think systematically about politics and to do so by employing the comparative method, he stands virtually alone in his age. Other thinkers sharing his commitments resorted to the universalizing language of natural rights when they ventured into the realm of political philosophy. Or, like Voltaire, they tied their thoughts about politics to a succession of specific issues, each essay bearing so indelibly the imprint of specific time and place that there was no room for theory in their writings. Finally, as is true of Diderot or D’Alembert, many of the philosophes were slow to recognize what Montesquieu knew from the outset, that if Enlightenment does not extend to politics it is futile.
Steeped in Montaigne’s scepticism, Montesquieu found that in the absence of absolutes there were good reasons to appreciate the ‘more than/less than’ and ‘better than/worse than’ judgments of comparative analysis. In his notebooks he commented that the flaw of most philosophers had been to ignore that the terms beautiful, good, noble, grand, and perfect are ‘relative to the beings who use them’. Only one absolute existed for Montesquieu and that was the evil of despotism, which must be avoided at all costs.
Montesquieu wrote three great works, each teaching lessons about despotism and freedom,The Persian Letters (1721), the Considerations of the Grandeur of the Romans and the Cause of Their Decline (1734), and The Spirit of the Laws (1748).
Title: Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat (1689–1755)
Description:
Montesquieu, one of the greatest figures of the Enlightenment, was famous in his own century both in France and in foreign lands, from Russia to the American colonies.
Later generations of French philosophes took for granted his concern to reform the criminal laws, to replace the Inquisition with a reign of tolerance, and to repudiate the vicious conquests of the Spaniards in the Americas.
They also accepted his finding that Protestant, commercial, and constitutionalist England and Holland represented all the best possibilities of Europe; whereas Catholic, economically backward, and politically absolutist Portugal and Spain represented the worst of the Western world and constituted a warning to the French.
Although the findings and specific reforms proposed by Montesquieu were repeated by many another figure of the French Enlightenment, his work in certain respects remained unique in the circles of the most advanced thinkers.
In his efforts to think systematically about politics and to do so by employing the comparative method, he stands virtually alone in his age.
Other thinkers sharing his commitments resorted to the universalizing language of natural rights when they ventured into the realm of political philosophy.
Or, like Voltaire, they tied their thoughts about politics to a succession of specific issues, each essay bearing so indelibly the imprint of specific time and place that there was no room for theory in their writings.
Finally, as is true of Diderot or D’Alembert, many of the philosophes were slow to recognize what Montesquieu knew from the outset, that if Enlightenment does not extend to politics it is futile.
Steeped in Montaigne’s scepticism, Montesquieu found that in the absence of absolutes there were good reasons to appreciate the ‘more than/less than’ and ‘better than/worse than’ judgments of comparative analysis.
In his notebooks he commented that the flaw of most philosophers had been to ignore that the terms beautiful, good, noble, grand, and perfect are ‘relative to the beings who use them’.
Only one absolute existed for Montesquieu and that was the evil of despotism, which must be avoided at all costs.
Montesquieu wrote three great works, each teaching lessons about despotism and freedom,The Persian Letters (1721), the Considerations of the Grandeur of the Romans and the Cause of Their Decline (1734), and The Spirit of the Laws (1748).
Related Results
11. Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de la Brede et de Montesquieu
11. Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de la Brede et de Montesquieu
This chapter examines the political theory and writings of French Enlightenment thinker, Montesquieu. It contends that Montesquieu’s constitutional theory of the separation of powe...
Montesquieu in Hungary
Montesquieu in Hungary
The interest of the great philosopher, jurist, and political thinker of the French Enlightenment, Charles-Louis de Sécondat, Baron de la Brède et de Montesquieu (1689–1755), turned...
Inactualités de Montesquieu: Valéry, Caillois, Starobinski
Inactualités de Montesquieu: Valéry, Caillois, Starobinski
Montesquieu occupa, nella storia del pensiero francese, una posizione di compromesso tra la prospezione e la retrospezione. Sebbene di nobili origini egli contesta, con il suo rela...
Montesquieu, Charles‐Louis de Secondat, Baron de
Montesquieu, Charles‐Louis de Secondat, Baron de
AbstractMontesquieu (1689–1755) was arguably the most influential philosopher of the eighteenth century, particularly with respect to his views on morality. His elliptical and apho...
Human Biting Activity, Resting Behavior and Yellow Virus Transmission Potential of Aedes Mosquitoes in Southwest Ethi-Opia
Human Biting Activity, Resting Behavior and Yellow Virus Transmission Potential of Aedes Mosquitoes in Southwest Ethi-Opia
Yellow fever is an emerging and re-emerging viral disease transmitted through the bites of infective Aedes mosquitoes. Several outbreaks of yellow fever have been documented in sou...
MONTESQUİEU’NÜN İKLİM TEORİSİ
MONTESQUİEU’NÜN İKLİM TEORİSİ
Sosyal
bilimlerin ele aldığı konular son derece karmaşık, dinamik ve değişken olguları
içinde barındırır. Ele alınan olayları bilimsel bir çerçevede
değerlendirebilmek için üç unsu...
Roman Emperors in Montesquieu’s Considerations
Roman Emperors in Montesquieu’s Considerations
Abstract
In his Considérations sur les causes de la grandeur des Romains et de leur décadence (1734, rev. 1748), the French political philosopher Montesquieu present...
Les représentations du peuple chez Montesquieu
Les représentations du peuple chez Montesquieu
Les questions sociologiques et politiques que soulèvent les textes de Montesquieu intègrent la figure du peuple comme élément important sur lequel s’appuie la réflexion du philosop...

