Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Evaluation of the Serrated Lesions Detection Rate and Its Role as a Colonoscopy Quality Criteria

View through CrossRef
Abstract Objectives To evaluate the serrated lesion detection rate in colonoscopy at a specialized clinic and its role as quality criteria for endoscopic examination. Methods This is an observational cross-sectional study with all patients that underwent colonoscopy between October 2018 and May 2019, performed by an experimented physician. A questionnaire was answered before the examination by the patient, and another questionnaire after the colonoscopy was answered by the medical team. All polyps identified were removed and sent to the same pathologist for analysis. Results A total of 1,000 colonoscopies were evaluated. The average age of the patients was 58.9 years old, and most of them were female (60.6%). In 62.5% of the procedures, polyps were removed, obtaining a total of 1,730 polyps, of which 529 were serrated lesions, being 272 sessile serrated lesions (SSL). This data resulted in a serrated lesion detection rate (SDR) of 29.2%, and of 14% when considering only the SSL detection rate (SSLDR). The right colon had higher rates, with 22.3% SDR and 15.3% SSLDR. Screening colonoscopies also presented a higher serrated detection rate, of 20%, followed by diagnostics and follow-up exams. Smoking was the only risk factor associated with higher serrated detection rate. Conclusions The serrated lesion detection rate is higher than the ones already previously suggested and the have the higher rates were stablished in the right colon and on screening exams.
Title: Evaluation of the Serrated Lesions Detection Rate and Its Role as a Colonoscopy Quality Criteria
Description:
Abstract Objectives To evaluate the serrated lesion detection rate in colonoscopy at a specialized clinic and its role as quality criteria for endoscopic examination.
Methods This is an observational cross-sectional study with all patients that underwent colonoscopy between October 2018 and May 2019, performed by an experimented physician.
A questionnaire was answered before the examination by the patient, and another questionnaire after the colonoscopy was answered by the medical team.
All polyps identified were removed and sent to the same pathologist for analysis.
Results A total of 1,000 colonoscopies were evaluated.
The average age of the patients was 58.
9 years old, and most of them were female (60.
6%).
In 62.
5% of the procedures, polyps were removed, obtaining a total of 1,730 polyps, of which 529 were serrated lesions, being 272 sessile serrated lesions (SSL).
This data resulted in a serrated lesion detection rate (SDR) of 29.
2%, and of 14% when considering only the SSL detection rate (SSLDR).
The right colon had higher rates, with 22.
3% SDR and 15.
3% SSLDR.
Screening colonoscopies also presented a higher serrated detection rate, of 20%, followed by diagnostics and follow-up exams.
Smoking was the only risk factor associated with higher serrated detection rate.
Conclusions The serrated lesion detection rate is higher than the ones already previously suggested and the have the higher rates were stablished in the right colon and on screening exams.

Related Results

Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
Low-Fibre Diet as an Option for Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy: ARandomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Low-Fibre Diet as an Option for Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy: ARandomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Introduction: Bowel preparation for colonoscopy plays an important role in the evaluation of the colon. Many methods for preparing the colon for colonoscopy do not work well. Aim:...
PillCam COLON 2 for investigation of the colon through direct visualisation: systematic review and economic evaluation
PillCam COLON 2 for investigation of the colon through direct visualisation: systematic review and economic evaluation
Background Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer deaths in England. Most cases of colorectal cancer aris...
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
<p><strong><span dir="ltr" role="presentation">1. Introduction</span></strong&...
G-EYE Colonoscopy Is Superior to Standard Colonoscopy for Increasing Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rate
G-EYE Colonoscopy Is Superior to Standard Colonoscopy for Increasing Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rate
Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Most CRCs develop from malignant potent...
Abstract 1448: Unraveling the oncogenic pathway of serrated polyposis syndrome driven by RNF43 germline mutation
Abstract 1448: Unraveling the oncogenic pathway of serrated polyposis syndrome driven by RNF43 germline mutation
Abstract Serrated polyps can arise in a sporadic or familial polyposis setting and predispose to colorectal cancer (CRC). Recently, we have identified RNF43 germline...
Multiple, zonal and multi‐zone adenoma detection rates according to quality of cleansing during colonoscopy
Multiple, zonal and multi‐zone adenoma detection rates according to quality of cleansing during colonoscopy
BackgroundThe safety and diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopy depend on the quality of colon cleansing. The adenoma detection rate is usually used as a quality measurement score.Obje...
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATION IN COLONOSCOPY SCREENING: A LITERATURE REVIEW
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATION IN COLONOSCOPY SCREENING: A LITERATURE REVIEW
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer globally and remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Despite the effectiveness of colonosc...

Back to Top