Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Cheating Detection with a Cheating Trap in Online Education

View through CrossRef
The recent global COVID-19 pandemic has proven that today education could no longer solely rely on traditional methods and reside within the walls of school buildings. With this unexpected shock, most higher education institutions have rapidly reacted by switching to remote forms of education. However, online education is not without limitations. When it comes to student evaluation, academic integrity becomes a significant concern, since distant forms of exams are categorically different from in-class assessments. Previous research illustrated that cheating rates rise when students have the opportunity to take online exams. Even though technological tools could be helpful for cheating detection, the downside is that these tools are often utilized at the expense of students’ privacy. In this paper, we tested the effectiveness of cheating traps in cheating detection and attempted to understand better the conditions and students’ motivations for online cheating. Using an experimental method, we presented easy and difficult tests with the expectation that students would fall into the traps during the difficult tests. Our findings indicate that when questions are perceived as difficult by students, they are more likely to cheat and rely on external sources irrespective of the credibility of the source consulted. To our knowledge, this is the first experimental study that investigates cheating in an online education setting by using a cheating trap. With this study, we also argue that setting cheating traps can be a practical solution for educators to detect online cheating without raising any concern and discomfort caused by digital surveillance.
Title: Cheating Detection with a Cheating Trap in Online Education
Description:
The recent global COVID-19 pandemic has proven that today education could no longer solely rely on traditional methods and reside within the walls of school buildings.
With this unexpected shock, most higher education institutions have rapidly reacted by switching to remote forms of education.
However, online education is not without limitations.
When it comes to student evaluation, academic integrity becomes a significant concern, since distant forms of exams are categorically different from in-class assessments.
Previous research illustrated that cheating rates rise when students have the opportunity to take online exams.
Even though technological tools could be helpful for cheating detection, the downside is that these tools are often utilized at the expense of students’ privacy.
In this paper, we tested the effectiveness of cheating traps in cheating detection and attempted to understand better the conditions and students’ motivations for online cheating.
Using an experimental method, we presented easy and difficult tests with the expectation that students would fall into the traps during the difficult tests.
Our findings indicate that when questions are perceived as difficult by students, they are more likely to cheat and rely on external sources irrespective of the credibility of the source consulted.
To our knowledge, this is the first experimental study that investigates cheating in an online education setting by using a cheating trap.
With this study, we also argue that setting cheating traps can be a practical solution for educators to detect online cheating without raising any concern and discomfort caused by digital surveillance.

Related Results

Keanekaragaman Serangga Yang Berpotensi Hama Di Hutan Pendidikan Universitas Jambi
Keanekaragaman Serangga Yang Berpotensi Hama Di Hutan Pendidikan Universitas Jambi
ABSTRACT This research is to identify the types of insect pests with four trapping methods, there are Sweep Net Trap, Pit Fall Trap, Yellow Paper Trap, and Light Trap. This researc...
Athletes’ Justification of Cheating in Sport: Relationship with Moral Disengagement in Sport and Personal Factors
Athletes’ Justification of Cheating in Sport: Relationship with Moral Disengagement in Sport and Personal Factors
Research background and hypothesis. The research focus is on university athletes’ justification of cheating in sport. We hypothesised that moral disengagement would be more linked ...
Cheating Detection with a Cheating Trap in Online Education
Cheating Detection with a Cheating Trap in Online Education
The recent global COVID-19 pandemic has proven that today education could no longer solely rely on traditional methods and reside within the walls of school buildings. With this un...
Cheating on Unproctored Online Exams: Prevalence, Mitigation Measures, and Effects on Exam Performance
Cheating on Unproctored Online Exams: Prevalence, Mitigation Measures, and Effects on Exam Performance
As online courses become increasingly common at the college level, an ongoing concern is how to ensure academic integrity in the online environment. One area that has received part...
Detect Exam Cheating Pattern by Data Mining
Detect Exam Cheating Pattern by Data Mining
This aim of this project is to apply a series of pattern detection Data Mining algorithms to accurately identify cheating by one or more students during classroom test exams. JMP s...
Notes on the trap-dykes of Edinburgh and neighbourhood
Notes on the trap-dykes of Edinburgh and neighbourhood
The igneous rocks in and around Edinburgh have been faithfully and accurately described by many geologists. Good service was rendered in this work by our late President, Mr Charles...
Effect Of Single Live Trap Rat Trap Model And Sherman Snap Trap Modification On The Number Of Mice Trapped In Pt.X Kitchen
Effect Of Single Live Trap Rat Trap Model And Sherman Snap Trap Modification On The Number Of Mice Trapped In Pt.X Kitchen
Tikus menjadi hama yang menimbulkan kerugian. PT.X memiliki dapur untuk melayani makan siang seluruh karyawan dan didapur tersebut terdapat keberadaan tikus dengan angka success tr...

Back to Top