Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Intermediate Glycemic Index: Filling the Temporal Gap Between Fructosamine and HbA1c
View through CrossRef
Objective: To develop and validate standardized glycemic biomarkers capable of capturing intermediate-term glycemic control (approximately eight weeks), thereby addressing the temporal gap between fructosamine and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Methods: A methodological validation study was conducted using laboratory results from individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). HbA1c and fructosamine values were normalized through min–max transformation anchored to established clinical reference intervals. Serial measurements of HbA1c, fructosamine, and fasting plasma glucose were obtained over an eight-week period to examine temporal associations among the biomarkers. Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, one-way analysis of variance, and Bland–Altman methods were employed to assess accuracy, agreement, and discriminative performance of the standardized indices. Results: Normalized HbA1c and fructosamine exhibited strong correlations with each other and with glycemic control derived from multiple glucose measurements throughout the eight-week interval. For both biomarkers, the upper limit of normality consistently approximated a normalized value of 1.0. A composite index integrating normalized HbA1c and fructosamine significantly enhanced discrimination between controlled and uncontrolled DM, yielding an area under the ROC curve superior to that of either biomarker alone. Conclusions: Standardized glycemic biomarkers represent a feasible and clinically meaningful strategy for assessing intermediate-term glycemic control, with potential applicability in routine DM management and in supporting earlier and more informed therapeutic decision-making.
Title: The Intermediate Glycemic Index: Filling the Temporal Gap Between Fructosamine and HbA1c
Description:
Objective: To develop and validate standardized glycemic biomarkers capable of capturing intermediate-term glycemic control (approximately eight weeks), thereby addressing the temporal gap between fructosamine and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).
Methods: A methodological validation study was conducted using laboratory results from individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).
HbA1c and fructosamine values were normalized through min–max transformation anchored to established clinical reference intervals.
Serial measurements of HbA1c, fructosamine, and fasting plasma glucose were obtained over an eight-week period to examine temporal associations among the biomarkers.
Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, one-way analysis of variance, and Bland–Altman methods were employed to assess accuracy, agreement, and discriminative performance of the standardized indices.
Results: Normalized HbA1c and fructosamine exhibited strong correlations with each other and with glycemic control derived from multiple glucose measurements throughout the eight-week interval.
For both biomarkers, the upper limit of normality consistently approximated a normalized value of 1.
A composite index integrating normalized HbA1c and fructosamine significantly enhanced discrimination between controlled and uncontrolled DM, yielding an area under the ROC curve superior to that of either biomarker alone.
Conclusions: Standardized glycemic biomarkers represent a feasible and clinically meaningful strategy for assessing intermediate-term glycemic control, with potential applicability in routine DM management and in supporting earlier and more informed therapeutic decision-making.
Related Results
2031-LB: Correlation between Fructosamine and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Preoperative Setting
2031-LB: Correlation between Fructosamine and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Preoperative Setting
Introduction and Objective: Fructosamine reflects glycemic control over 2-3 weeks via albumin turnover, offering a short-term alternative to HbA1c. Its perioperative use has increa...
Fructosamine and HbA1c for Monitoring Diabetes in Pregnancy: <i>Complementary or competing?</i>
Fructosamine and HbA1c for Monitoring Diabetes in Pregnancy: <i>Complementary or competing?</i>
Objectives: This study aimed to perform a comparative evaluation of glycaemic control using fructosamine and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and to investigate the correlations betwee...
Individualized Glycemic Index: A New Approach to Personalized Glycemic Control
Individualized Glycemic Index: A New Approach to Personalized Glycemic Control
ABSTRACT
Introduction
The assessment of glycemic control is fundamental for diabetes management. However, traditional measures ...
2391-PUB: Determinants of Poor Glycemic Control among Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes
2391-PUB: Determinants of Poor Glycemic Control among Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes
Objective: The majority of adolescents with type 1 diabetes have poor glycemic control, calling for an action to be taken. The aim of this study was to identify the determinants of...
Estimation of Average Blood Glucose Values Based on Fructosamine Values
Estimation of Average Blood Glucose Values Based on Fructosamine Values
ABSTRACT
Introduction
The fructosamine is originated of the glycation of plasmatic proteins, especially albumin, in addition to...
Glycometabolic Control and Fibrinolysis in Diabetic Patients
Glycometabolic Control and Fibrinolysis in Diabetic Patients
We investigated 148 diabetic patients with regard to their relationship between fibrinolysis (D-dimer and plasminogen activator inhibitor; PAI) and glycometabolic control (HbA<s...
The Fallacy of Average: How Using HbA1c Alone to Assess Glycemic Control Can Be Misleading
The Fallacy of Average: How Using HbA1c Alone to Assess Glycemic Control Can Be Misleading
HbA1c is a valuable metric for comparing treatment groups in a randomized trial, for assessing glycemic trends in a population over time, or for cross-sectional comparisons of glyc...
Glycemic control, HbA1c variability, and major cardiovascular adverse outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients with elevated cardiovascular risk: insights from the ACCORD study
Glycemic control, HbA1c variability, and major cardiovascular adverse outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients with elevated cardiovascular risk: insights from the ACCORD study
Abstract
Background
Although recent guidelines advocate for HbA1c target individualization, a comprehensive criterion for patient categorization rem...

