Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Clinical Significance of Oral Health Related Quality of Life for Oral Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
View through CrossRef
Background: Oral cancer is relevant not only to medical practitioners but also to dentists because they have a responsibility in the early detection and prevention in the early stages of disease. Dentists are also responsible for supportive care and prosthetic rehabilitation of oral cancer patients undergoing treatment. However, more work is required on the clinical significance of quality of life for oral cancer patients. Few reviews have been conducted on the clinical significance of oral health related quality of life in oral cancer patients and hence there is minimal guidance on the support these patients need. Methods: An electronic search was conducted on Google Scholar, PubMed, Biomedical central, JSTOR and Oxford Academic databases between October 2020 and November 2021 using the keywords “oral cancer”, “oral health related quality of life” and “clinical significance”. The search was limited to dental journals and MEDLINE and the information was extracted using the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Nine articles out of eighty-eight were found to be most relevant and were included in the analysis. Surgery has had significantly (p<0.05) positive effects on the oral health related quality of life of oral cancer patients than patients who received radiotherapy. However, microvascular surgery seemed to negatively affect the quality of life than local reconstruction. Xerostomia was worst in patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy, then those patients who only had oral surgery. Conclusion: Evidence suggests that oral cancer patients’ experience a negative impact to health-related quality of life especially in the first three months but the quality of life improves thereafter almost five years after oncological treatment.
SciVision Publishers LLC
Title: Clinical Significance of Oral Health Related Quality of Life for Oral Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
Description:
Background: Oral cancer is relevant not only to medical practitioners but also to dentists because they have a responsibility in the early detection and prevention in the early stages of disease.
Dentists are also responsible for supportive care and prosthetic rehabilitation of oral cancer patients undergoing treatment.
However, more work is required on the clinical significance of quality of life for oral cancer patients.
Few reviews have been conducted on the clinical significance of oral health related quality of life in oral cancer patients and hence there is minimal guidance on the support these patients need.
Methods: An electronic search was conducted on Google Scholar, PubMed, Biomedical central, JSTOR and Oxford Academic databases between October 2020 and November 2021 using the keywords “oral cancer”, “oral health related quality of life” and “clinical significance”.
The search was limited to dental journals and MEDLINE and the information was extracted using the PRISMA guidelines.
Results: Nine articles out of eighty-eight were found to be most relevant and were included in the analysis.
Surgery has had significantly (p<0.
05) positive effects on the oral health related quality of life of oral cancer patients than patients who received radiotherapy.
However, microvascular surgery seemed to negatively affect the quality of life than local reconstruction.
Xerostomia was worst in patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy, then those patients who only had oral surgery.
Conclusion: Evidence suggests that oral cancer patients’ experience a negative impact to health-related quality of life especially in the first three months but the quality of life improves thereafter almost five years after oncological treatment.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract
A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
4.N. Workshop: Maternal Oral Health Models and Initiatives in Global and Public Health Perspectives
4.N. Workshop: Maternal Oral Health Models and Initiatives in Global and Public Health Perspectives
Abstract
Achieving and maintaining good oral health is essential for both the oral and overall health of expecting mothers and...

