Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Karol Wojtyła jako fenomenolog
View through CrossRef
The article analyzes Karol Wojtyła’s phenomenology understood as a method. Such phenomenology must be critical: the meaning of all fundamental terms (such as subject, consciousness) must be grasped in their original intuitive givenness. The analyses in Person and Act focus on the subject who simultaneously constitutes a certain objectivity. The person is constituted as a hierarchical, stratified system, which the author unveils in its successive aspects (consciousness, agency, act, will, participation). Such an approach to the subject–object can only be achieved through a purely noematic phenomenology. Only this guarantees the realism of cognition, primarily by revealing the proper role of consciousness in the constitution of human personal existence. Human contact with being is, in this view, direct: it occurs before the threshold of consciousness and is therefore not mediated by consciousness as if it were a separate region of being. Consciousness can exist neither as a substantial subject, nor as the ontic foundation of experiences, nor as a faculty. Consciousness does not objectify but merely reflects what has already been objectified through knowledge and self-knowledge, which guarantees the primacy of being over consciousness. The article also discloses many other aspects of Wojtyła’s phenomenology: the primacy of ontology in the analysis of cognition, the primacy of the analysis of action over cognition in shaping a realistic conception of the human being, the weakness of a phenomenology built on perception alone, the significance of language in the intuitive disclosure of phenomena, etc.
Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika/Nicolaus Copernicus University
Title: Karol Wojtyła jako fenomenolog
Description:
The article analyzes Karol Wojtyła’s phenomenology understood as a method.
Such phenomenology must be critical: the meaning of all fundamental terms (such as subject, consciousness) must be grasped in their original intuitive givenness.
The analyses in Person and Act focus on the subject who simultaneously constitutes a certain objectivity.
The person is constituted as a hierarchical, stratified system, which the author unveils in its successive aspects (consciousness, agency, act, will, participation).
Such an approach to the subject–object can only be achieved through a purely noematic phenomenology.
Only this guarantees the realism of cognition, primarily by revealing the proper role of consciousness in the constitution of human personal existence.
Human contact with being is, in this view, direct: it occurs before the threshold of consciousness and is therefore not mediated by consciousness as if it were a separate region of being.
Consciousness can exist neither as a substantial subject, nor as the ontic foundation of experiences, nor as a faculty.
Consciousness does not objectify but merely reflects what has already been objectified through knowledge and self-knowledge, which guarantees the primacy of being over consciousness.
The article also discloses many other aspects of Wojtyła’s phenomenology: the primacy of ontology in the analysis of cognition, the primacy of the analysis of action over cognition in shaping a realistic conception of the human being, the weakness of a phenomenology built on perception alone, the significance of language in the intuitive disclosure of phenomena, etc.
Related Results
Evidence of Karol Wojtyła’s thought formation as preserved in archival materials
Evidence of Karol Wojtyła’s thought formation as preserved in archival materials
The purpose of the present article is to present selected differences between two versions of the endings of Karol Wojtyła’s postdoctoral dissertation Ocena możliwości zbudowania e...
Service-Learning in the Context of Karol Wojtyła’s Theory of Participation
Service-Learning in the Context of Karol Wojtyła’s Theory of Participation
Objectives of the research: The aim of this article is to explore how Karol Wojtyła’s theory of participation can enhance our understanding of ‘Service Learning’ (SL) and its poten...
Karol Wojtyła reads and interprets Max Scheler
Karol Wojtyła reads and interprets Max Scheler
The present article addresses Karol Wojtyła’s “encounter” with Max Scheler’s thought, expressed mainly in his work Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die Materiale Wertethik (Formali...
Bishop Karol Wojtyła in the Kraków cathedral chapter (1958–1963)
Bishop Karol Wojtyła in the Kraków cathedral chapter (1958–1963)
Karol Wojtyła as a canon of Kraków from the introduction of Bishop K. Wojtyła to the Chapter in 1958 until the announcement of his nomination as Archbishop Metropolitan of Kraków. ...
Education for Responsible Freedom in the Teaching of Karol Wojtyła – John Paul II
Education for Responsible Freedom in the Teaching of Karol Wojtyła – John Paul II
The purpose of this article is an attempt to show, based on selected excerpts from the works of Karol Wojtyła – John Paul II, the specificity of education oriented towards discover...
Roman Ingarden and Karol Wojtyła’s Reading of Max Scheler
Roman Ingarden and Karol Wojtyła’s Reading of Max Scheler
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the criticism that Roman Ingarden and Karol Wojtyła made of the ethical system proposed by Max Scheler. On the basis of the indicated simila...
Spiritual Heritage of Europe in the Light of Personalistic Universalism of Karol Wojtyla—John Paul II
Spiritual Heritage of Europe in the Light of Personalistic Universalism of Karol Wojtyla—John Paul II
The article is devoted to the philosophical and theological thought of Karol Wojtyła, i.e., John Paul II, who in his considerations gave a lot of attention to European issues, incl...
El Concilio Vaticano II y Karol Wojtyla
El Concilio Vaticano II y Karol Wojtyla
El artículo presenta algunos resultados del estudio de la participación de Karol Wojtyła, obispo auxiliar y, sucesivamente, arzobispo de Cracovia, en el Concilio Vaticano II, así c...

