Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Locke, Boyle and Peter Stahl

View through CrossRef
Abstract John Locke and Robert Boyle first met at some time before May 1660 but do not seem to have become closely acquainted until 1664 when they were both in Oxford.1 Locke’s notebooks for 1664-67 contain many short entries ending ‘Mr.Boyle’, which appear to be details that Locke received from Boyle personally.2 In his work, Boyle relied on various assistants, quite apart from craftsmen like glass-blowers and blacksmiths, who ranged from his amanuensis, needed because of his poor sight, and his servants who watched experiments through the night, to skilled collaborators like Robert Hooke.3 In addition, Boyle was in touch with independent workers, notably Richard Lower whose name appears in Locke’s notebooks some time before Boyle’s;4 and Dewhurst suggested that Locke was also a member of this group.5 It is certainly true that Locke provided Boyle with barometric and meteorological readings about this time and that 21 of his headings for the ‘chymicall Analysis’ of blood are related to Boyle’s 46 headings in his Memoirs for the Natural History of Human Blood (1683/4).6 But it is going too far to conclude from Locke’s practical notes on blood that he was then acting as Boyle’s assistant. Those notes come from Bodleian MS. Locke f.25. What they describe are not ‘experiments’ done by Locke, Boyle or anyone else. They are a record of the practical work Locke did when he attended a course of lectures in 1666 which were given by Peter Stahl, the German chemist brought by Boyle to Oxford in 1659.
Title: Locke, Boyle and Peter Stahl
Description:
Abstract John Locke and Robert Boyle first met at some time before May 1660 but do not seem to have become closely acquainted until 1664 when they were both in Oxford.
1 Locke’s notebooks for 1664-67 contain many short entries ending ‘Mr.
Boyle’, which appear to be details that Locke received from Boyle personally.
2 In his work, Boyle relied on various assistants, quite apart from craftsmen like glass-blowers and blacksmiths, who ranged from his amanuensis, needed because of his poor sight, and his servants who watched experiments through the night, to skilled collaborators like Robert Hooke.
3 In addition, Boyle was in touch with independent workers, notably Richard Lower whose name appears in Locke’s notebooks some time before Boyle’s;4 and Dewhurst suggested that Locke was also a member of this group.
5 It is certainly true that Locke provided Boyle with barometric and meteorological readings about this time and that 21 of his headings for the ‘chymicall Analysis’ of blood are related to Boyle’s 46 headings in his Memoirs for the Natural History of Human Blood (1683/4).
6 But it is going too far to conclude from Locke’s practical notes on blood that he was then acting as Boyle’s assistant.
Those notes come from Bodleian MS.
Locke f.
25.
What they describe are not ‘experiments’ done by Locke, Boyle or anyone else.
They are a record of the practical work Locke did when he attended a course of lectures in 1666 which were given by Peter Stahl, the German chemist brought by Boyle to Oxford in 1659.

Related Results

John Locke, William Penn, and the Question of Locke's Pardon
John Locke, William Penn, and the Question of Locke's Pardon
Shortly after Locke’s death, Jean Le Clerc began collecting materials for the short biography he was planning to publish in the periodical he edited, the Bibli...
Locke, John (1632–1704)
Locke, John (1632–1704)
John Locke was the leading English philosopher of the late seventeenth century. His two major works, An Essay concerning Human Understanding and Two Treatises of Government, both p...
Stahl, Franklin William
Stahl, Franklin William
AbstractThis article highlights Stahl's role as a leading expert on the central biological process of ‘genetic recombination’ (Stahl, 1987, 1988) during the last six decades as his...
Locke, John (1632–1704)
Locke, John (1632–1704)
John Locke was the first of the empiricist opponents of Descartes to achieve comparable authority among his European contemporaries. Together with Newton’s physics, the philosophy ...
Textual Authority and Modern American Autobiography: Robert McAlmon, Kay Boyle, and the Writing of a Lost Generation
Textual Authority and Modern American Autobiography: Robert McAlmon, Kay Boyle, and the Writing of a Lost Generation
By the mid-1960s, American writer Kay Boyle was in possession of a three-book contract from Doubleday publishers in New York. The cornerstone of this deal was to be a history of ...
Locke’s Legacy, Kallen’s Memory
Locke’s Legacy, Kallen’s Memory
This chapter explores Alain Locke's legacy and Horace Kallen's perspective on their friendship. It reveals Kallen's version of Locke's story: Locke as the “first black ‘cultural pl...
Locke, Ayers, and Abstraction
Locke, Ayers, and Abstraction
Berkeley famously took Locke’s account of abstraction to be a process of mental separation that creates incomplete ideas which represent many individuals. A nu...
Robert Boyle Reconsidered
Robert Boyle Reconsidered
This book presents a new view of Robert Boyle (1627–91), the leading British scientist in the generation before Newton. It comprises a series of essays by scholars from Europe and ...

Back to Top