Javascript must be enabled to continue!
goFlux: A user-friendly tool for calculating GHG fluxes regardless of experience
View through CrossRef
Non-steady state chambers are widely used for measuring soil and ecosystem greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes, but causes non-steady state diffusion between the soil air and headspace, leading to non-linear behavior of gas accumulation over time during enclosure. In turn, linear regression (LM), commonly used to estimate GHG fluxes, may underestimate the pre-deployment flux (f0). Many alternatives to LM have been developed to provide a more accurate estimation of f0, for instance the method of Hutchinson and Mosier (HM), which accounts for non-linearity in gas accumulation during enclosure. However, non-linear models may overestimate f0, due to exaggerated curvature at time zero. Users therefore need to make subjective choices between LM and HM, often based on visual inspection or unsuited statistical metrics, such as R2, which can have profound impacts on end results. High-precision greenhouse gas analyzers, often combined with automatic chamber systems, promise to broaden our understanding of soil-atmosphere feedback in time and space. On the other hand, such systems produce enormous amounts of data that need to be processed automatically and consistently for reliable outputs: for example, by automatically selecting the best flux estimate based on either linear or non-linear models. At the same time, the number of researchers measuring soil-atmosphere fluxes from chambers is increasing and there is a need to develop GHG flux analysis tools that transcends prior user experience and produce the highest-quality data.We here present the goFlux R package designed as an all-inclusive flux calculation tool to calculate chamber GHG fluxes. goFlux allows for an easy import of raw data directly into R from a variety of instruments (LI-COR, LGR, GAIA2TECH, Gasmet, Picarro, Aeris and PP-Systems); simplifies identification of start and end times of individual flux measurements; quality checks the results based on objective criteria that goes beyond simply using R2; and provides the user with a recommendation for the best flux estimate. In summary, goFlux is meant to be “student proof”, meaning that no extensive knowledge or experience is needed for data import and pre-processing in R, and selecting the best flux estimate (LM or HM).In goFlux, a central element is to constrain the maximal curvature allowed due to non-linearity, by using the parameter of kappa-max (k), first introduced in Hüppi et al. (2018). The advantage of the k parameter is that it is based on objective metrics of instrument precision and chamber specific dimensions and applying k essentially avoids excessive flux overestimation, especially for noisy or small fluxes which often appears in chamber-based applications. Furthermore, following flux calculation, the best flux estimate is selected based on a user selection of multiple statistical criteria, such as the g-factor (ratio between LM and HM flux estimates) and indices of model fit (e.g. MAE, RMSE, AICc). In addition, poor quality measurements may be flagged based on minimal detectable flux (MDF), an intercept out of bounds, or due to insufficient number of observations.For more information, visit our webpage: https://qepanna.quarto.pub/goflux/
Title: goFlux: A user-friendly tool for calculating GHG fluxes regardless of experience
Description:
Non-steady state chambers are widely used for measuring soil and ecosystem greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes, but causes non-steady state diffusion between the soil air and headspace, leading to non-linear behavior of gas accumulation over time during enclosure.
In turn, linear regression (LM), commonly used to estimate GHG fluxes, may underestimate the pre-deployment flux (f0).
Many alternatives to LM have been developed to provide a more accurate estimation of f0, for instance the method of Hutchinson and Mosier (HM), which accounts for non-linearity in gas accumulation during enclosure.
However, non-linear models may overestimate f0, due to exaggerated curvature at time zero.
Users therefore need to make subjective choices between LM and HM, often based on visual inspection or unsuited statistical metrics, such as R2, which can have profound impacts on end results.
High-precision greenhouse gas analyzers, often combined with automatic chamber systems, promise to broaden our understanding of soil-atmosphere feedback in time and space.
On the other hand, such systems produce enormous amounts of data that need to be processed automatically and consistently for reliable outputs: for example, by automatically selecting the best flux estimate based on either linear or non-linear models.
At the same time, the number of researchers measuring soil-atmosphere fluxes from chambers is increasing and there is a need to develop GHG flux analysis tools that transcends prior user experience and produce the highest-quality data.
We here present the goFlux R package designed as an all-inclusive flux calculation tool to calculate chamber GHG fluxes.
goFlux allows for an easy import of raw data directly into R from a variety of instruments (LI-COR, LGR, GAIA2TECH, Gasmet, Picarro, Aeris and PP-Systems); simplifies identification of start and end times of individual flux measurements; quality checks the results based on objective criteria that goes beyond simply using R2; and provides the user with a recommendation for the best flux estimate.
In summary, goFlux is meant to be “student proof”, meaning that no extensive knowledge or experience is needed for data import and pre-processing in R, and selecting the best flux estimate (LM or HM).
In goFlux, a central element is to constrain the maximal curvature allowed due to non-linearity, by using the parameter of kappa-max (k), first introduced in Hüppi et al.
(2018).
The advantage of the k parameter is that it is based on objective metrics of instrument precision and chamber specific dimensions and applying k essentially avoids excessive flux overestimation, especially for noisy or small fluxes which often appears in chamber-based applications.
Furthermore, following flux calculation, the best flux estimate is selected based on a user selection of multiple statistical criteria, such as the g-factor (ratio between LM and HM flux estimates) and indices of model fit (e.
g.
MAE, RMSE, AICc).
In addition, poor quality measurements may be flagged based on minimal detectable flux (MDF), an intercept out of bounds, or due to insufficient number of observations.
For more information, visit our webpage: https://qepanna.
quarto.
pub/goflux/.
Related Results
Latest updates to the goFlux R package: new functionalities and improvements
Latest updates to the goFlux R package: new functionalities and improvements
The goFlux R package was designed as an all-inclusive flux calculation tool to calculate chamber GHG fluxes. goFlux allows for an easy import of raw data directly into R from a var...
The Challenge: Estimating Greenhouse Gas Budgets from Heterogeneous Forest Soils
The Challenge: Estimating Greenhouse Gas Budgets from Heterogeneous Forest Soils
Forests soils are characterized by a pronounced spatial variability of chemical, biological and physical soil parameters, and therefore pose a great challenge for the monitoring of...
Large spatial variability of GHG emissions from an alpine peatland detected by chamber based measurements.
Large spatial variability of GHG emissions from an alpine peatland detected by chamber based measurements.
The study focuses on GHG fluxes analysis (CH4 and CO2) under climate change pressure at “Le Viote” alpine peatland (46.01 N, 11.04 E, 1560 m asl), located in the middle of a platea...
Seasonal and diurnal patterns in Greenhouse Gas fluxes from re-wetted European peatlands
Seasonal and diurnal patterns in Greenhouse Gas fluxes from re-wetted European peatlands
Peatlands represent 2.5% of all agricultural land in the EU, yet they account for ~ 25% of agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and ~ 5% of total EU-wide GHG emissions. Sev...
Inter-specific variations in tree stem methane and nitrous oxide exchanges in a tropical rainforest
Inter-specific variations in tree stem methane and nitrous oxide exchanges in a tropical rainforest
<p>Tropical forests are the most productive terrestrial ecosystems, global centres of biodiversity and important participants in the global carbon and water cycles. T...
What Is the Impact of Turfgrass on Urban Carbon Dioxide Fluxes?
What Is the Impact of Turfgrass on Urban Carbon Dioxide Fluxes?
Evaluating the efficacy of climate mitigation measures requires quantifying urban greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Both anthropogenic and biogenic GHG fluxes are important in urban ...
Towards a better understanding of soil- and tree stem-atmosphere exchanges of greenhouse gases, i.e. CO2, CH4, N2O, in a tropical rainforest
Towards a better understanding of soil- and tree stem-atmosphere exchanges of greenhouse gases, i.e. CO2, CH4, N2O, in a tropical rainforest
<p>The importance of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in global climate change is undisputed, but our understanding of the daily and seasonal variations of the GHG flux...
Alternative-Fuel-Vehicle Policy Interactions Increase U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Alternative-Fuel-Vehicle Policy Interactions Increase U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The transportation sector is currently the largest contributor of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the United States, and light-duty vehicles produce the majority of transportatio...

