Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Obstetric Anesthesia Work Force Survey, 1981 versus 1992 

View through CrossRef
Background In 1981, with support from the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, anesthesia and obstetric providers were surveyed to identify the personnel and methods used to provide obstetric anesthesia in the United States. The survey was expanded and repeated in 1992 with support from the same organizations. Methods Comments and questions from the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Obstetrical Anesthesia and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice were added to the original survey instrument to include newer issues while allowing comparison with data from 1981. Using the American Hospital Association registry of hospitals, hospitals were differentiated by number of births per year (stratum I, > or = 1,500 births; stratum II, 500-1,499 births; stratum III, < 500 births) and by U.S. census region. A stratified random sample of hospitals was selected. Two copies of the survey were sent to the administrator of each hospital, one for the chief of obstetrics and one for the chief of anesthesiology. Results Compared with 1981 data, there was an overall reduction in the number of hospitals providing obstetric care (from 4,163 to 3,545), with the decrease occurring in the smallest units (56% of stratum III hospitals in 1981 compared with 45% in 1992). More women received some type of labor analgesia and there was a 100% increase in the use of epidural analgesia. However, regional analgesia was unavailable in 20% of the smallest hospitals. Spinal analgesia for labor was used in 4% of parturients. In 1981, obstetricians provided 30% of epidural analgesia for labor; they provided only 2% in 1992. Regional anesthesia was used for 78-85% (depending on strata) of patients undergoing cesarean section, resulting in a marked decrease in the use of general anesthesia. Anesthesia for cesarean section was provided by nurse anesthetists without the medical direction of an anesthesiologist in only 4% of stratum I hospitals but in 59% of stratum III hospitals. Anesthesia personnel provided neonatal resuscitation in 10% of cesarean deliveries compared with 23% in 1981. Conclusions Compared with 1981, analgesia is more often used by parturients during labor, and general anesthesia is used less often in patients having cesarean section deliveries. In the smallest hospitals, regional analgesia for labor is still unavailable to many parturients, and more than one half of anesthetics for cesarean section are provided by nurse anesthetists without medical direction by an anesthesiologist. Obstetricians are less likely to personally provide epidural analgesia for their patients. Anesthesia personnel are less involved in newborn resuscitation.
Title: Obstetric Anesthesia Work Force Survey, 1981 versus 1992 
Description:
Background In 1981, with support from the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, anesthesia and obstetric providers were surveyed to identify the personnel and methods used to provide obstetric anesthesia in the United States.
The survey was expanded and repeated in 1992 with support from the same organizations.
Methods Comments and questions from the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Obstetrical Anesthesia and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice were added to the original survey instrument to include newer issues while allowing comparison with data from 1981.
Using the American Hospital Association registry of hospitals, hospitals were differentiated by number of births per year (stratum I, > or = 1,500 births; stratum II, 500-1,499 births; stratum III, < 500 births) and by U.
S.
census region.
A stratified random sample of hospitals was selected.
Two copies of the survey were sent to the administrator of each hospital, one for the chief of obstetrics and one for the chief of anesthesiology.
Results Compared with 1981 data, there was an overall reduction in the number of hospitals providing obstetric care (from 4,163 to 3,545), with the decrease occurring in the smallest units (56% of stratum III hospitals in 1981 compared with 45% in 1992).
More women received some type of labor analgesia and there was a 100% increase in the use of epidural analgesia.
However, regional analgesia was unavailable in 20% of the smallest hospitals.
Spinal analgesia for labor was used in 4% of parturients.
In 1981, obstetricians provided 30% of epidural analgesia for labor; they provided only 2% in 1992.
Regional anesthesia was used for 78-85% (depending on strata) of patients undergoing cesarean section, resulting in a marked decrease in the use of general anesthesia.
Anesthesia for cesarean section was provided by nurse anesthetists without the medical direction of an anesthesiologist in only 4% of stratum I hospitals but in 59% of stratum III hospitals.
Anesthesia personnel provided neonatal resuscitation in 10% of cesarean deliveries compared with 23% in 1981.
Conclusions Compared with 1981, analgesia is more often used by parturients during labor, and general anesthesia is used less often in patients having cesarean section deliveries.
In the smallest hospitals, regional analgesia for labor is still unavailable to many parturients, and more than one half of anesthetics for cesarean section are provided by nurse anesthetists without medical direction by an anesthesiologist.
Obstetricians are less likely to personally provide epidural analgesia for their patients.
Anesthesia personnel are less involved in newborn resuscitation.

Related Results

Comparative Study of Inguinal Hernia Repair under Local Anesthesia versus Spinal Anesthesia in Reducing Hospital Stay of Patient
Comparative Study of Inguinal Hernia Repair under Local Anesthesia versus Spinal Anesthesia in Reducing Hospital Stay of Patient
Background: Inguinal hernia is a very common problem in men. Mostly end in hernia repair. As inguinal hernia present in lower abdomen, below umbilicus, repair can be done under spi...
Obstetric admission and maternal mortality in the intensive care unit in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Obstetric admission and maternal mortality in the intensive care unit in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background Obstetric complications are a major contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in low-resource settings such as many countries in Africa. Inte...
Coexistence and prevalence of obstetric interventions: an analysis based on the grade of membership
Coexistence and prevalence of obstetric interventions: an analysis based on the grade of membership
Abstract Background Obstetric interventions performed during delivery do not reflect improvements in obstetric care. Several practices routinely per...
Abstract 297: Impact of Anesthesia Type on Outcomes Following Carotid Artery Stenting: A Prospective Cohort Analysis
Abstract 297: Impact of Anesthesia Type on Outcomes Following Carotid Artery Stenting: A Prospective Cohort Analysis
Introduction/Purpose The optimal anesthesia approach during carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains debated, with limited large‐scale evidence comparing general a...

Back to Top