Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer

View through CrossRef
AbstractAimThe aim was to evaluate the physiological variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (Lap‐ISR) for ultralow rectal cancer.MethodThis was a retrospective study that included 56 patients who underwent Lap‐ISR from a prospectively collected database. The RAIR was examined preoperatively and up to 12 months after ileostomy closure. The primary outcome included physiological variation in RAIR and its difference between partial, subtotal and total ISR. The secondary outcome was its correlation with functional outcome.ResultsThe reflex was present in 95% (53/56) of patients preoperatively, in 36% (20/56) before ileostomy closure, in 48% (27/56) at 3–6 months and in 61% (34/56) at 12 months after ileostomy closure. The elicited volume of RAIR was significantly increased at 12 months after ileostomy closure than at baseline (P = 0.005), but its duration and amplitude did not differ significantly. There was no significant difference in the reflex recovery between the ISR groups (partial vs. subtotal vs. total: 65% vs. 63% vs. 44%, P = 0.61). At 12 months after ileostomy closure, the RAIR‐present group had favourable functional results and patient satisfaction (P < 0.05). Major faecal incontinence was found in 82% of patients in the RAIR‐absent group.ConclusionThe RAIR is abolished in the majority of patients after Lap‐ISR, but a time‐dependent recovery could be observed in more than half of the patients. The reflex recovery is not influenced by the resection grade of the internal sphincter. However, persistent loss of the RAIR correlates with worse continence.
Title: Variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer
Description:
AbstractAimThe aim was to evaluate the physiological variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (Lap‐ISR) for ultralow rectal cancer.
MethodThis was a retrospective study that included 56 patients who underwent Lap‐ISR from a prospectively collected database.
The RAIR was examined preoperatively and up to 12 months after ileostomy closure.
The primary outcome included physiological variation in RAIR and its difference between partial, subtotal and total ISR.
The secondary outcome was its correlation with functional outcome.
ResultsThe reflex was present in 95% (53/56) of patients preoperatively, in 36% (20/56) before ileostomy closure, in 48% (27/56) at 3–6 months and in 61% (34/56) at 12 months after ileostomy closure.
The elicited volume of RAIR was significantly increased at 12 months after ileostomy closure than at baseline (P = 0.
005), but its duration and amplitude did not differ significantly.
There was no significant difference in the reflex recovery between the ISR groups (partial vs.
subtotal vs.
total: 65% vs.
63% vs.
44%, P = 0.
61).
At 12 months after ileostomy closure, the RAIR‐present group had favourable functional results and patient satisfaction (P < 0.
05).
Major faecal incontinence was found in 82% of patients in the RAIR‐absent group.
ConclusionThe RAIR is abolished in the majority of patients after Lap‐ISR, but a time‐dependent recovery could be observed in more than half of the patients.
The reflex recovery is not influenced by the resection grade of the internal sphincter.
However, persistent loss of the RAIR correlates with worse continence.

Related Results

Risk Factors for Anorectal Dysfunction After Interspincteric Resection in Patients With Low Rectal Cancer
Risk Factors for Anorectal Dysfunction After Interspincteric Resection in Patients With Low Rectal Cancer
Purpose: The objective of this study was to explore the risk factors for anorectal dysfunction after intersphincteric resection in patients with low rectal cancer.Methods: A total ...
Rectal Sensory-Motor Alterations: A Clinical Perspective on Anorectal Disorders
Rectal Sensory-Motor Alterations: A Clinical Perspective on Anorectal Disorders
Abstract Background Altered rectal sensation and motility are prevalent in various anorectal disorders. However, the correlation between rectal sensation and motility has n...
Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal cancer: Initial experiences from 15 consecutive cases at Cho Ray Hospital
Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal cancer: Initial experiences from 15 consecutive cases at Cho Ray Hospital
Abstract Introduction: Conventional laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer has several challenges regarding the technique issues such as a limited range of motion instruments....
Comparison of Postoperative Complications Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery
Comparison of Postoperative Complications Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery
Abstract Objective: Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer have been applied in clinic for decades, nevertheless, which surgical approach has a lower rate of po...
Analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of a Simplified Rectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol in the Evaluation of Rectal Cancer
Analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of a Simplified Rectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol in the Evaluation of Rectal Cancer
Abstract Objective: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a simplified rectal MRI scanning protocol in the assessment of patients with rectal cancer. Ma...
Effectiveness of placing prophylactic mesh with the Sugarbaker technique via laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer
Effectiveness of placing prophylactic mesh with the Sugarbaker technique via laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer
Abstract Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of parastomal hernia prevention with the Sugarbaker technique via laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection fo...
Summary
Summary
SummaryThe present study was performed with the aim of investigating what mechanisms are employed in eliciting the reflexly induced inhibition of intestinal motility, and thus how ...

Back to Top