Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Outcome of glandular urethral Disassembly (GUD) Technique in Distal penile hypospadias Repair
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Introduction
Different surgical techniques have been described for repair of DPH included MAGPI, TIP, MATIU, GUD
TIP is the most commonly performed surgery for hypospadias, and the most common complications are urethrocutaneous fistula, meatal stenosis, especially if the glans width 14 mm and urethral plate <6mm
The technique of urethral mobilisation was first described by Beck (1898) and was popularized by Koff in 1981 . The main advantage of the this procedure is the absence of urethroplasty and, consequently, a low risk of fistula . but the distance prone for mobilisation is up to 1.5 cm, all of the previous techniques focusing on urethral mobilisation only and the distance between the urethral opening and the tip of the glans ,but in GUD technique focusing on minimal urethral mobilisation and extensive glandular dissection like we do in epispedias repair
Aim of the study
to present the results of GUD technique for different types of distal penile hypospadias .
Patients and methods
This study was conducted at Zagazig University Hospitals from April 2021 to April 2023 , include 30 patients underwent repair of Distal penile hypospadias by GUD technique
Inclusion criteria
Primary cases of DPH
recurrent distal hypospadias
or urethral fistula cases
Exclusion criteria
presence of severe chordee,
Mid penile hypospadias
a proximal hypospadias and
Results
This study include 30 patients ,
5 patients (16.6%) presented with a complication after the procedure as follows: 2 cases (6.6%) with meatal stenosis., 1 dehiscence that was predisposed by infection
meatal retraction in 1 (3.3%)
One patient (3.3%) presented with a fistula that may be caused by accidentally injury of the urethra
No post operative Bleeding ,infection, iatrogenic chordee
10 (33.3%) of cases were coronal type , 7(23.3% )recurrent DPH ,6( 20% )subcoronal,3(10%) glandular, 2(6.6% ) urethral fistula 2 (6.6%) megameatus intact prepuce. The mean age at surgery was 2.7year, mean operative time was 38.1 minutes, mean Hospital stay 12.8h , mean duration for catheter removal 4.6 days and the follow up duration was 3.6 months.
Conclusion
GUD procedure is a is a simple , safe technique for distal penile hypospedias in selected cases with minimal complication
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Outcome of glandular urethral Disassembly (GUD) Technique in Distal penile hypospadias Repair
Description:
Abstract
Introduction
Different surgical techniques have been described for repair of DPH included MAGPI, TIP, MATIU, GUD
TIP is the most commonly performed surgery for hypospadias, and the most common complications are urethrocutaneous fistula, meatal stenosis, especially if the glans width 14 mm and urethral plate <6mm
The technique of urethral mobilisation was first described by Beck (1898) and was popularized by Koff in 1981 .
The main advantage of the this procedure is the absence of urethroplasty and, consequently, a low risk of fistula .
but the distance prone for mobilisation is up to 1.
5 cm, all of the previous techniques focusing on urethral mobilisation only and the distance between the urethral opening and the tip of the glans ,but in GUD technique focusing on minimal urethral mobilisation and extensive glandular dissection like we do in epispedias repair
Aim of the study
to present the results of GUD technique for different types of distal penile hypospadias .
Patients and methods
This study was conducted at Zagazig University Hospitals from April 2021 to April 2023 , include 30 patients underwent repair of Distal penile hypospadias by GUD technique
Inclusion criteria
Primary cases of DPH
recurrent distal hypospadias
or urethral fistula cases
Exclusion criteria
presence of severe chordee,
Mid penile hypospadias
a proximal hypospadias and
Results
This study include 30 patients ,
5 patients (16.
6%) presented with a complication after the procedure as follows: 2 cases (6.
6%) with meatal stenosis.
, 1 dehiscence that was predisposed by infection
meatal retraction in 1 (3.
3%)
One patient (3.
3%) presented with a fistula that may be caused by accidentally injury of the urethra
No post operative Bleeding ,infection, iatrogenic chordee
10 (33.
3%) of cases were coronal type , 7(23.
3% )recurrent DPH ,6( 20% )subcoronal,3(10%) glandular, 2(6.
6% ) urethral fistula 2 (6.
6%) megameatus intact prepuce.
The mean age at surgery was 2.
7year, mean operative time was 38.
1 minutes, mean Hospital stay 12.
8h , mean duration for catheter removal 4.
6 days and the follow up duration was 3.
6 months.
Conclusion
GUD procedure is a is a simple , safe technique for distal penile hypospedias in selected cases with minimal complication.
Related Results
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Single-Stage Pedicle Preputial Tube Substitution Urethroplasty with Corpora Cavernosa Augmentation Using Buccal Mucosa Graft for Primary Peno-Scrotal Hypospadias Repair in Adults
Single-Stage Pedicle Preputial Tube Substitution Urethroplasty with Corpora Cavernosa Augmentation Using Buccal Mucosa Graft for Primary Peno-Scrotal Hypospadias Repair in Adults
ABSTRACT Introduction Pre-engagement hypospadias repairs are not uncommon in developed countries like India. Male genital malformations that are not associated with voiding dysfun...
Catheter-induced urethral injury and tubularized urethral plate urethroplasty in such iatrogenic hypospadias
Catheter-induced urethral injury and tubularized urethral plate urethroplasty in such iatrogenic hypospadias
AbstractBackgroundCatheter-induced urethral erosion can involve meatus, glans and any extent of penile shaft. These injuries cause a lot of psychological, social and sexual trauma ...
Paediatric penile perception score (PPPS) in hypospadias repair
Paediatric penile perception score (PPPS) in hypospadias repair
The present cross-sectional study sought to evaluate the Paediatric Penile Perception Score (PPPS) as a tool to assess parental perception of hypospadias repair in children. In all...
Comparison of Modified Mathieu versus Standard Tubularised Incised-Plate Urethroplasty for Distal Hypospadias Repair
Comparison of Modified Mathieu versus Standard Tubularised Incised-Plate Urethroplasty for Distal Hypospadias Repair
Objective: To compare the outcomes of modified Mathieu versus standard tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias repair. Materials and Methods: This prospecti...
Urethral strictures. Diagnosis and treatment
Urethral strictures. Diagnosis and treatment
Urethral strictures represent the intrinsic and permanent narrowing of the urethral lumen with urodynamic effects and genitourinary complications resulting from obstruction in the ...
Management of urethral diverticular stone with stricture: a case report
Management of urethral diverticular stone with stricture: a case report
Abstract
Background
Acquired male urethral diverticula are seen in patients with traumatic urethral stricture, urethral surgery, or rarely follow...
(012) Sexual Dysfunction in Men After Failed Hypospadias Repair
(012) Sexual Dysfunction in Men After Failed Hypospadias Repair
Abstract
Introduction
Hypospadias is commonly treated in childhood, and future sexual function of such patients is sometimes ove...

