Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Socio-Legal History of The Rotorua Township Agreement - Trick or Treaty?
View through CrossRef
<p><strong>This thesis aimed to analyse and discuss the socio-legal history of an agreement made between Ngāti Whakaue and the Crown known as the Rotorua Township Agreement, which is one of several regional agreements or treaties that the colonial (Government) and iwi Māori negotiated after the Treaty of Waitangi in the later nineteenth century. After the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi in 1840, there were three iwi in Aotearoa who entered into distinct treaties with the Crown: Ngāti Whakaue of Rotorua, Tūhoe of Te Urewera and Ngāti Maniapoto of the King Country. Though the focus of this thesis is Ngāti Whakaue and the Rotorua Township Agreement (1880), it will be revealed that the Crown used these regional agreements to deceive Māori located in the Central North Island into believing they possessed sovereignty over their lands when, in hindsight, they did not. Do these regional treaties count under New Zealand or international law? This critical question was thoroughly examined in this thesis. The central focus of this thesis is the Rotorua Township Agreement. In the late 1870s, the Government wanted to create a township that would become a geothermal and cultural attraction for international tourism. In 1880, the local chiefs of Ngāti Whakaue and Te Arawa signed an agreement with Judge Francis Dart Fenton to set up the township of Rotorua. Was this agreement a trick or a treaty? The Rotorua Township Agreement will be compared to similar agreements or treaties made with Tūhoe (Urewera District Native Reserve Act 1896) and Ngāti Maniapoto (Te Ōhākī Tapu 1882-1885). The final analysis of this research compared these three agreements or treaties and the socio-legal histories of these three iwi. This comparative analysis aims to assist Ngāti Whakaue, whose Treaty claim remains unsettled, to reach a similar deal as Tūhoe and Ngāti Maniapoto, who have successfully settled their Treaty claims in recent years. With the recent change in New Zealand Government, the Treaty of Waitangi is now more under threat than ever. Therefore, all New Zealanders, Māori and non-Māori, need to unite and support iwi such as Ngāti Whakaue in their efforts to settle their claims and regain their ‘tino rangatiratanga’ promised them under Te Tiriti o Waitangi. A Māori proverb, or ‘whakataukī’ states: ‘Ahakoa ngā uaua, kia manawanui!’ – ‘Despite the hardships, be strong-hearted’.</strong></p>
Title: The Socio-Legal History of The Rotorua Township Agreement - Trick or Treaty?
Description:
<p><strong>This thesis aimed to analyse and discuss the socio-legal history of an agreement made between Ngāti Whakaue and the Crown known as the Rotorua Township Agreement, which is one of several regional agreements or treaties that the colonial (Government) and iwi Māori negotiated after the Treaty of Waitangi in the later nineteenth century.
After the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi in 1840, there were three iwi in Aotearoa who entered into distinct treaties with the Crown: Ngāti Whakaue of Rotorua, Tūhoe of Te Urewera and Ngāti Maniapoto of the King Country.
Though the focus of this thesis is Ngāti Whakaue and the Rotorua Township Agreement (1880), it will be revealed that the Crown used these regional agreements to deceive Māori located in the Central North Island into believing they possessed sovereignty over their lands when, in hindsight, they did not.
Do these regional treaties count under New Zealand or international law? This critical question was thoroughly examined in this thesis.
The central focus of this thesis is the Rotorua Township Agreement.
In the late 1870s, the Government wanted to create a township that would become a geothermal and cultural attraction for international tourism.
In 1880, the local chiefs of Ngāti Whakaue and Te Arawa signed an agreement with Judge Francis Dart Fenton to set up the township of Rotorua.
Was this agreement a trick or a treaty? The Rotorua Township Agreement will be compared to similar agreements or treaties made with Tūhoe (Urewera District Native Reserve Act 1896) and Ngāti Maniapoto (Te Ōhākī Tapu 1882-1885).
The final analysis of this research compared these three agreements or treaties and the socio-legal histories of these three iwi.
This comparative analysis aims to assist Ngāti Whakaue, whose Treaty claim remains unsettled, to reach a similar deal as Tūhoe and Ngāti Maniapoto, who have successfully settled their Treaty claims in recent years.
With the recent change in New Zealand Government, the Treaty of Waitangi is now more under threat than ever.
Therefore, all New Zealanders, Māori and non-Māori, need to unite and support iwi such as Ngāti Whakaue in their efforts to settle their claims and regain their ‘tino rangatiratanga’ promised them under Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
A Māori proverb, or ‘whakataukī’ states: ‘Ahakoa ngā uaua, kia manawanui!’ – ‘Despite the hardships, be strong-hearted’.
</strong></p>.
Related Results
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction
The exact manner in which large language models (LLMs) will be integrated into pathology is not yet fully comprehended. This study examines the accuracy, bene...
Family event participation: building flourishing communities
Family event participation: building flourishing communities
PurposeFamily participation in community events and festivals is framed by certain conditions related to their ability to enhance their quality of life (QOL) and family flourishing...
Tax-legal dimension of the EU founding treaties
Tax-legal dimension of the EU founding treaties
In this article, the author examines the legal nature and content of the EU founding treaties in the part of their impact on the regulation of tax relations. Having the nature of i...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Developing a Model for Packaging and Popularizing Township Tourism in Zimbabwe
Developing a Model for Packaging and Popularizing Township Tourism in Zimbabwe
Purpose: There is tremendous potential for vibrant township tourism in Zimbabwe. The country boasts an abundance of township tourism resources such as monuments of colonial history...
Township/Village Administration from the Late Qing to the Warlord Period
Township/Village Administration from the Late Qing to the Warlord Period
In ancient China, formal government institutions stretched to the county level. This system witnessed a radical transformation during the late Qing and the Warlord period, with var...
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
Ukraine's contemporary legal system is undergoing a period of significant transformation, which necessitates not only a robust and stable legal framework, but also a flexible doctr...
Administrative Legal Entities of Private Legal Entities as a Status Component of the Legal Regulation Mechanism: Characteristics of Elem
Administrative Legal Entities of Private Legal Entities as a Status Component of the Legal Regulation Mechanism: Characteristics of Elem
The article is devoted to administrative legal personality, which is part of the structure of the administrative-legal personality of private legal entities. At the same time, it i...

