Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Islamophobia and Translations of Securitization in the UK, France, and Italy

View through CrossRef
Abstract This book contributes to research on Islamophobia and critical security studies by exploring the historical trajectory and the intra-party dynamics that led three Western European centre-left parties (British Labour Party, French Socialist Party, and Italian Democratic Party) to securitize Islam. Western governments have increasingly framed Islam as a threat to national security in recent decades. Yet, the ideas and languages through which securitization manifests across and inside right-wing and left-wing parties is less examined by current literature. This book shows that political parties translate security (particularly the securitization of Islam) in the name of various ideological references. This is necessary to understand why the same securitized threat (Muslims) is interpreted differently by political parties on the Right and the Left. The author engages with one main question: How do Islamophobia and specifically its securitarian dimension travel across and inside political parties? The author argues that the securitization of Islam travels across and inside parties through a process called translation, which occurs through the appropriation of tropes traditionally belonging to the other political pole. Translation is active, because Islamophobic tropes are translated into a language coherent with partisan ideologies. Translation is also collective. If the securitization audiences are not persuaded by translation, the process might be rejected, and such rejection can lead to de-securitization. Translation is also influenced and made possible by contextual elements: the party history, the interaction between the Right and the Left, and significant external events that increased the perception of insecurity raised by Muslims.
Oxford University PressNew York, NY
Title: Islamophobia and Translations of Securitization in the UK, France, and Italy
Description:
Abstract This book contributes to research on Islamophobia and critical security studies by exploring the historical trajectory and the intra-party dynamics that led three Western European centre-left parties (British Labour Party, French Socialist Party, and Italian Democratic Party) to securitize Islam.
Western governments have increasingly framed Islam as a threat to national security in recent decades.
Yet, the ideas and languages through which securitization manifests across and inside right-wing and left-wing parties is less examined by current literature.
This book shows that political parties translate security (particularly the securitization of Islam) in the name of various ideological references.
This is necessary to understand why the same securitized threat (Muslims) is interpreted differently by political parties on the Right and the Left.
The author engages with one main question: How do Islamophobia and specifically its securitarian dimension travel across and inside political parties? The author argues that the securitization of Islam travels across and inside parties through a process called translation, which occurs through the appropriation of tropes traditionally belonging to the other political pole.
Translation is active, because Islamophobic tropes are translated into a language coherent with partisan ideologies.
Translation is also collective.
If the securitization audiences are not persuaded by translation, the process might be rejected, and such rejection can lead to de-securitization.
Translation is also influenced and made possible by contextual elements: the party history, the interaction between the Right and the Left, and significant external events that increased the perception of insecurity raised by Muslims.

Related Results

Translations of Virgil into Esperanto
Translations of Virgil into Esperanto
This chapter stands apart from the rest, since it discusses the translations of Virgil into Esperanto, an artificial international language invented in 1887 by Ludwig Zamenhof, a J...
Successes and Failures in Virgilian Translation
Successes and Failures in Virgilian Translation
This chapter’s discussion of premodern Virgilian translations, those that predate 1850, provides an important historical background to the different directions of Virgilian transla...
Translations of Virgil into Ancient Greek
Translations of Virgil into Ancient Greek
This chapter traces the two-thousand-year-old tradition of translating Virgil into ancient Greek. It examines verse translations composed in late antiquity (Oratio Constantini) and...
Being Muslim Today
Being Muslim Today
"Qureshi promotes a moderate and inclusive view of contemporary Islam, with the intellectual underpinnings to support it." -Booklist, Starred Review Accessible in...
A Securitization Scheme for Resolving Europe’s Problem Loans
A Securitization Scheme for Resolving Europe’s Problem Loans
This chapter proposes a comprehensive, pan-European way of addressing the issue of non-performing exposures. We contend that securitization is the most effective way for banks to s...
Italy in the Nineteenth Century
Italy in the Nineteenth Century
Abstract The Short Oxford History of Italy series, in seven volumes, will offer a complete History of Italy from the early middle ages to the present and, in each pe...
Losing a Continent
Losing a Continent
England's capture of Canada in 1760 was the culmination of the French and Indian War and of a century and a half of conflict between Britain and France for control of the North Ame...
Virgil after Vietnam
Virgil after Vietnam
The focus of this chapter is the major American verse translations published in the last fifty years. These translations were inevitably framed by Virgil’s attitude to empire, sinc...

Back to Top