Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Torque teno virus viremia and QuantiFERON®-CMV assay in prediction of cytomegalovirus reactivation in R+ kidney transplant recipients

View through CrossRef
IntroductionCytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most frequent infectious complication following solid organ transplantation. Torque teno viruses (TTV) viremia has been proposed as a biomarker of functional immunity in the management of kidney transplant recipients (KTR). The QuantiFERON®-CMV (QF-CMV) is a commercially available assay that allows the assessment of CD8+ T-cell responses in routine diagnostic laboratories.MethodsIn a prospective national multicenter cohort of 64 CMV-seropositive (R+) KTR, we analyzed the value of TTV load and the two markers of the QF-CMV assay [QF-Ag (CMV-specific T-cell responses) and QF-Mg (overall T-cell responses)], alone and in combination, in prediction of CMV reactivation (≥3 log10 IU/ ml) in the first post-transplant year. We compared previously published cut-offs and specific cut-offs optimized from ROC curves for our population.ResultsUsing the conventional cut-off (3.45 log10 copies/ml), TTV load at D0 [inclusion visit on the day of transplantation before induction (D0)], or at M1 (1-month post-transplant visit) perform better in predicting CMV viremia control than CMV reactivation. Survival analyses suggest a better performance of our optimized TTV cut-offs (3.78 log10 copies/ml at D0 and 4.23 log10 copies/ml at M1) for risk stratification of CMV reactivation in our R+ KTR cohort. The QF-CMV (QF-Ag = 0.2 IU/ml, and QF-Mg = 0.5 IU/ml) also appears to better predict CMV viremia control than CMV reactivation. Moreover, survival analyses suggest that the QF-Mg would perform better than the QF-Ag in stratifying the risk of CMV reactivation. The use of our optimized QF-Mg cut-off (1.27 IU/ml) at M1 further improved risk stratification of CMV reactivation. Using conventional cut-offs, the combination of TTV load and QF-Ag or TTV load and QF-Mg did not improve prediction of CMV viremia control compared to separate analysis of each marker but resulted in an increase of positive predictive values. The use of our cut-offs slightly improved risk prediction of CMV reactivation.ConclusionThe combination of TTV load and QF-Ag or TTV load and QF-Mg could be useful in stratifying the risk of CMV reactivation in R+ KTR during the first post-transplant year and thereby have an impact on the duration of prophylaxis in these patients.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov registry, identifier NCT02064699.
Title: Torque teno virus viremia and QuantiFERON®-CMV assay in prediction of cytomegalovirus reactivation in R+ kidney transplant recipients
Description:
IntroductionCytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most frequent infectious complication following solid organ transplantation.
Torque teno viruses (TTV) viremia has been proposed as a biomarker of functional immunity in the management of kidney transplant recipients (KTR).
The QuantiFERON®-CMV (QF-CMV) is a commercially available assay that allows the assessment of CD8+ T-cell responses in routine diagnostic laboratories.
MethodsIn a prospective national multicenter cohort of 64 CMV-seropositive (R+) KTR, we analyzed the value of TTV load and the two markers of the QF-CMV assay [QF-Ag (CMV-specific T-cell responses) and QF-Mg (overall T-cell responses)], alone and in combination, in prediction of CMV reactivation (≥3 log10 IU/ ml) in the first post-transplant year.
We compared previously published cut-offs and specific cut-offs optimized from ROC curves for our population.
ResultsUsing the conventional cut-off (3.
45 log10 copies/ml), TTV load at D0 [inclusion visit on the day of transplantation before induction (D0)], or at M1 (1-month post-transplant visit) perform better in predicting CMV viremia control than CMV reactivation.
Survival analyses suggest a better performance of our optimized TTV cut-offs (3.
78 log10 copies/ml at D0 and 4.
23 log10 copies/ml at M1) for risk stratification of CMV reactivation in our R+ KTR cohort.
The QF-CMV (QF-Ag = 0.
2 IU/ml, and QF-Mg = 0.
5 IU/ml) also appears to better predict CMV viremia control than CMV reactivation.
Moreover, survival analyses suggest that the QF-Mg would perform better than the QF-Ag in stratifying the risk of CMV reactivation.
The use of our optimized QF-Mg cut-off (1.
27 IU/ml) at M1 further improved risk stratification of CMV reactivation.
Using conventional cut-offs, the combination of TTV load and QF-Ag or TTV load and QF-Mg did not improve prediction of CMV viremia control compared to separate analysis of each marker but resulted in an increase of positive predictive values.
The use of our cut-offs slightly improved risk prediction of CMV reactivation.
ConclusionThe combination of TTV load and QF-Ag or TTV load and QF-Mg could be useful in stratifying the risk of CMV reactivation in R+ KTR during the first post-transplant year and thereby have an impact on the duration of prophylaxis in these patients.
Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.
gov registry, identifier NCT02064699.

Related Results

Adenovirus and BK Virus Co-Infection in the Pediatric Recipient of Stem Cell Transplant with CMV Infection.
Adenovirus and BK Virus Co-Infection in the Pediatric Recipient of Stem Cell Transplant with CMV Infection.
Abstract Background: Viral infections are a common cause of complication following hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is known to be...
Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients in High Endemic Population
Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients in High Endemic Population
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It causes end-organ disease, multi-org...

Back to Top