Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Data from Bacterial Vaginosis Decreases the Risk of Cervical Cytological Abnormalities

View through CrossRef
<div>Abstract<p>Genital tract infections, including vulvovaginal candidiasis and bacterial vaginosis, have emerged as potential modulators of persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infections causing cervical cytologic abnormalities and cervical cancer. This study aimed to investigate whether vulvovaginal candidiasis or bacterial vaginosis had an additional effect on HPV infection and thus caused such abnormalities. ThinPrep cytologic tests were used to detect cytologic abnormalities, vulvovaginal candidiasis, and bacterial vaginosis in 14,679 women. Cytologic abnormalities included atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude HSIL, and squamous cell carcinoma. Logistic regression Model 1 (univariate regression) and Model 2 (multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age combined with HPV infection) were used to analyze the association between bacterial vaginosis and cytologic abnormalities, or vulvovaginal candidiasis and cytologic abnormalities, alone or in the presence of HPV infection. Bacterial vaginosis infection rates were found to be significantly higher in the cytology-negative group among all participants and those with HPV infection (<i>P</i> = 0.003, <i>P</i> < 0.001, respectively). Analyses using Model 1 and Model 2 both pointed to bacterial vaginosis as a protective factor against cytologic abnormalities for all participants (OR = 0.36, 0.17, respectively, <i>P</i> < 0.05) and for HPV-infected participants (OR = 0.17, 0.16, respectively, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Neither vulvovaginal candidiasis nor vulvovaginal candidiasis + HPV was significantly associated with the incidence of cytologic abnormalities based on Model 1 (OR = 0.94, 0.71, respectively, <i>P</i> > 0.05) and Model 2 (OR = 0.91, 0.74, respectively, <i>P</i> > 0.05). Furthermore, neither vulvovaginal candidiasis nor bacterial vaginosis increased the incidence of cytologic abnormalities regardless of HPV infection status, while bacterial vaginosis might possibly prevent cytologic abnormalities in women coinfected by HPV.</p>Prevention Relevance:<p>Neither vulvovaginal candidiasis nor bacterial vaginosis was found to increase the incidence of cervical cytologic abnormalities with or without the presence of HPV. On the contrary, bacterial vaginosis may play a role in preventing cytologic abnormalities in women with HPV coinfection.</p></div>
Title: Data from Bacterial Vaginosis Decreases the Risk of Cervical Cytological Abnormalities
Description:
<div>Abstract<p>Genital tract infections, including vulvovaginal candidiasis and bacterial vaginosis, have emerged as potential modulators of persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infections causing cervical cytologic abnormalities and cervical cancer.
This study aimed to investigate whether vulvovaginal candidiasis or bacterial vaginosis had an additional effect on HPV infection and thus caused such abnormalities.
ThinPrep cytologic tests were used to detect cytologic abnormalities, vulvovaginal candidiasis, and bacterial vaginosis in 14,679 women.
Cytologic abnormalities included atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude HSIL, and squamous cell carcinoma.
Logistic regression Model 1 (univariate regression) and Model 2 (multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age combined with HPV infection) were used to analyze the association between bacterial vaginosis and cytologic abnormalities, or vulvovaginal candidiasis and cytologic abnormalities, alone or in the presence of HPV infection.
Bacterial vaginosis infection rates were found to be significantly higher in the cytology-negative group among all participants and those with HPV infection (<i>P</i> = 0.
003, <i>P</i> < 0.
001, respectively).
Analyses using Model 1 and Model 2 both pointed to bacterial vaginosis as a protective factor against cytologic abnormalities for all participants (OR = 0.
36, 0.
17, respectively, <i>P</i> < 0.
05) and for HPV-infected participants (OR = 0.
17, 0.
16, respectively, <i>P</i> < 0.
05).
Neither vulvovaginal candidiasis nor vulvovaginal candidiasis + HPV was significantly associated with the incidence of cytologic abnormalities based on Model 1 (OR = 0.
94, 0.
71, respectively, <i>P</i> > 0.
05) and Model 2 (OR = 0.
91, 0.
74, respectively, <i>P</i> > 0.
05).
Furthermore, neither vulvovaginal candidiasis nor bacterial vaginosis increased the incidence of cytologic abnormalities regardless of HPV infection status, while bacterial vaginosis might possibly prevent cytologic abnormalities in women coinfected by HPV.
</p>Prevention Relevance:<p>Neither vulvovaginal candidiasis nor bacterial vaginosis was found to increase the incidence of cervical cytologic abnormalities with or without the presence of HPV.
On the contrary, bacterial vaginosis may play a role in preventing cytologic abnormalities in women with HPV coinfection.
</p></div>.

Related Results

Data from Bacterial Vaginosis Decreases the Risk of Cervical Cytological Abnormalities
Data from Bacterial Vaginosis Decreases the Risk of Cervical Cytological Abnormalities
<div>Abstract<p>Genital tract infections, including vulvovaginal candidiasis and bacterial vaginosis, have emerged as potential modulators of persistent human papilloma...
Cervical cancer screening utilization and predictors among eligible women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Cervical cancer screening utilization and predictors among eligible women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BackgroundDespite a remarkable progress in the reduction of global rate of maternal mortality, cervical cancer has been identified as the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mo...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Modern understanding of bacterial vaginosis
Modern understanding of bacterial vaginosis
Bacterial vaginosis is an infectious non-inflammatory syndrome characterized by the replacement of the usual microflora by the polymicrobial associations of anaerobes and Gardnerel...
Diagnosis and Management of Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnant Women
Diagnosis and Management of Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnant Women
Bacterial vaginosis is a disease that is a public health problem, especially in women, both non-pregnant and pregnant women. Bacterial vaginosis is caused by an excess and overgrow...
Cervical Cancer or Cervical Endometriosis – Review and Case Report
Cervical Cancer or Cervical Endometriosis – Review and Case Report
According to cancer death rates for women worldwide, this form of cancer ranks fourth after breast, bronchopulmonary, and colorectal cancer, affecting around 570,000 women annually...
Efficacy of cervical pessary versus cervical cerclage in preventing spontaneous preterm birth: a meta-analysis
Efficacy of cervical pessary versus cervical cerclage in preventing spontaneous preterm birth: a meta-analysis
Backgroud: The clinical efficacy and safety of cervical pessary versus cervical cerclage in preventing spontaneous preterm birth remain uncertain. Objectives: To systematically rev...
The Women Who Fear the Unknown: Potential Drivers of the Cervical Cancer Epidemic in Rural Nigeria
The Women Who Fear the Unknown: Potential Drivers of the Cervical Cancer Epidemic in Rural Nigeria
Background: Visual inspection of the cervix under acetic acid is the most cost-effective method for the control of cervical cancer in sub-Saharan Africa. The region bears about 90%...

Back to Top