Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Should All Orthopaedists Perform Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures? A Volume–Outcome Analysis
View through CrossRef
Objectives:
To determine whether very low surgeon and hospital hip arthroplasty volumes are associated with unfavorable outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.
Methods:
Patients ≥60 years of age and who underwent hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture were identified in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System data from 2001 to 2015. Incidence of inpatient mortality and postoperative complications were compared across both surgeon and hospital volume using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for clinical and demographic factors.
Results:
Fifty eight thousand eight hundred fourteen patients were included. Low surgeon volume (1 case/year) was associated with increased complications [hazard ratio (HR) 1.35, 95% CI, 1.26–1.44, P < 0.0001), including dislocations (HR 1.31 95% CI, 1.04–1.65, P = 0.02) and several medical complications (P = 0.003) compared with surgeons performing at least 2 hip arthroplasties/year. Low hospital volume (<20 cases/year) was associated with increased complications (HR 1.11, 95% CI, 1.02–1.20, P = 0.02), including deep infections (HR 1.39, 95% CI, 1.02–1.89, P = 0.04) and certain medical complications (P = 0.02) compared with centers performing at least 50 hip arthroplasties/year. Hospital and surgeon volume were not associated with inpatient mortality (P = 0.98) or reoperations (P = 0.40).
Conclusions:
Providers who rarely perform hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures should defer these cases to surgeons and hospitals who regularly perform hip arthroplasty. Additional research is needed to further characterize the thresholds for “low volume” and to determine whether there is additional benefit afforded by high-volume surgeons and hospitals (or if it is adequate that providers performing hemiarthroplasty maintain volumes above relatively low thresholds as identified here).
Level of Evidence:
Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Should All Orthopaedists Perform Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures? A Volume–Outcome Analysis
Description:
Objectives:
To determine whether very low surgeon and hospital hip arthroplasty volumes are associated with unfavorable outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.
Methods:
Patients ≥60 years of age and who underwent hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture were identified in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System data from 2001 to 2015.
Incidence of inpatient mortality and postoperative complications were compared across both surgeon and hospital volume using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for clinical and demographic factors.
Results:
Fifty eight thousand eight hundred fourteen patients were included.
Low surgeon volume (1 case/year) was associated with increased complications [hazard ratio (HR) 1.
35, 95% CI, 1.
26–1.
44, P < 0.
0001), including dislocations (HR 1.
31 95% CI, 1.
04–1.
65, P = 0.
02) and several medical complications (P = 0.
003) compared with surgeons performing at least 2 hip arthroplasties/year.
Low hospital volume (<20 cases/year) was associated with increased complications (HR 1.
11, 95% CI, 1.
02–1.
20, P = 0.
02), including deep infections (HR 1.
39, 95% CI, 1.
02–1.
89, P = 0.
04) and certain medical complications (P = 0.
02) compared with centers performing at least 50 hip arthroplasties/year.
Hospital and surgeon volume were not associated with inpatient mortality (P = 0.
98) or reoperations (P = 0.
40).
Conclusions:
Providers who rarely perform hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures should defer these cases to surgeons and hospitals who regularly perform hip arthroplasty.
Additional research is needed to further characterize the thresholds for “low volume” and to determine whether there is additional benefit afforded by high-volume surgeons and hospitals (or if it is adequate that providers performing hemiarthroplasty maintain volumes above relatively low thresholds as identified here).
Level of Evidence:
Prognostic Level II.
See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Related Results
FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, ANATOMICAL DESCRIPTION, MECHANISM OF ACTION, CLASSIFICATION, CLINICAL EVALUATION, IMAGING EVALUATION, TREATMENT AND COMPLICATIONS
FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, ANATOMICAL DESCRIPTION, MECHANISM OF ACTION, CLASSIFICATION, CLINICAL EVALUATION, IMAGING EVALUATION, TREATMENT AND COMPLICATIONS
Introduction: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are frequent and devastating injuries in orthopedics and traumatology. It usually has several therapeutic options depending on the type o...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Conjoined tendon preserving posterior approach in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: A prospective multicenter clinical study of 322 patients
Conjoined tendon preserving posterior approach in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: A prospective multicenter clinical study of 322 patients
Purpose The posterior approach is widely used in femoral hemiarthroplasty. The major problem with this approach is the high risk of postoperative dislocation. A modified posterior ...
Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation
Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation
Abstract
Background
Internal fixation of the femoral neck carries a risk of perforation due to the presence of the isthmus of the femoral neck. At present, there are few s...
Dynamic compression locking system versus multiple cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study
Dynamic compression locking system versus multiple cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study
Abstract
Background
Femoral neck fractures are one of the problems in orthopedic treatment. The prognosis is uncertain. Currently, there is no one internal fixation for th...
Dynamic compression locking system versus multiple cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study
Dynamic compression locking system versus multiple cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study
Abstract
Background: Femoral neck fractures are one of the problems in orthopedic treatment. The prognosis is uncertain. Currently, there is no one internal fixation for th...
Risk Factor Analysis of Intraoperative Femoral Metaphyseal Fractures in Cementless Hip Hemiarthroplasty
Risk Factor Analysis of Intraoperative Femoral Metaphyseal Fractures in Cementless Hip Hemiarthroplasty
To investigate the risk factors for intraoperative femoral metaphyseal fractures during primary hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA). A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who u...
Angiographic evaluation of femoral bifurcation in Chinese population
Angiographic evaluation of femoral bifurcation in Chinese population
Objective
Common femoral artery (CFA) access has been proved to be safe with lower risk of complications in percutaneous catheterisation. The femoral head can be ...

