Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Should All Orthopaedists Perform Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures? A Volume–Outcome Analysis

View through CrossRef
Objectives: To determine whether very low surgeon and hospital hip arthroplasty volumes are associated with unfavorable outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. Methods: Patients ≥60 years of age and who underwent hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture were identified in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System data from 2001 to 2015. Incidence of inpatient mortality and postoperative complications were compared across both surgeon and hospital volume using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for clinical and demographic factors. Results: Fifty eight thousand eight hundred fourteen patients were included. Low surgeon volume (1 case/year) was associated with increased complications [hazard ratio (HR) 1.35, 95% CI, 1.26–1.44, P < 0.0001), including dislocations (HR 1.31 95% CI, 1.04–1.65, P = 0.02) and several medical complications (P = 0.003) compared with surgeons performing at least 2 hip arthroplasties/year. Low hospital volume (<20 cases/year) was associated with increased complications (HR 1.11, 95% CI, 1.02–1.20, P = 0.02), including deep infections (HR 1.39, 95% CI, 1.02–1.89, P = 0.04) and certain medical complications (P = 0.02) compared with centers performing at least 50 hip arthroplasties/year. Hospital and surgeon volume were not associated with inpatient mortality (P = 0.98) or reoperations (P = 0.40). Conclusions: Providers who rarely perform hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures should defer these cases to surgeons and hospitals who regularly perform hip arthroplasty. Additional research is needed to further characterize the thresholds for “low volume” and to determine whether there is additional benefit afforded by high-volume surgeons and hospitals (or if it is adequate that providers performing hemiarthroplasty maintain volumes above relatively low thresholds as identified here). Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Title: Should All Orthopaedists Perform Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures? A Volume–Outcome Analysis
Description:
Objectives: To determine whether very low surgeon and hospital hip arthroplasty volumes are associated with unfavorable outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.
Methods: Patients ≥60 years of age and who underwent hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture were identified in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System data from 2001 to 2015.
Incidence of inpatient mortality and postoperative complications were compared across both surgeon and hospital volume using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for clinical and demographic factors.
Results: Fifty eight thousand eight hundred fourteen patients were included.
Low surgeon volume (1 case/year) was associated with increased complications [hazard ratio (HR) 1.
35, 95% CI, 1.
26–1.
44, P < 0.
0001), including dislocations (HR 1.
31 95% CI, 1.
04–1.
65, P = 0.
02) and several medical complications (P = 0.
003) compared with surgeons performing at least 2 hip arthroplasties/year.
Low hospital volume (<20 cases/year) was associated with increased complications (HR 1.
11, 95% CI, 1.
02–1.
20, P = 0.
02), including deep infections (HR 1.
39, 95% CI, 1.
02–1.
89, P = 0.
04) and certain medical complications (P = 0.
02) compared with centers performing at least 50 hip arthroplasties/year.
Hospital and surgeon volume were not associated with inpatient mortality (P = 0.
98) or reoperations (P = 0.
40).
Conclusions: Providers who rarely perform hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures should defer these cases to surgeons and hospitals who regularly perform hip arthroplasty.
Additional research is needed to further characterize the thresholds for “low volume” and to determine whether there is additional benefit afforded by high-volume surgeons and hospitals (or if it is adequate that providers performing hemiarthroplasty maintain volumes above relatively low thresholds as identified here).
Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II.
See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Related Results

Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation
Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation
Abstract Background Internal fixation of the femoral neck carries a risk of perforation due to the presence of the isthmus of the femoral neck. At present, there are few s...
Angiographic evaluation of femoral bifurcation in Chinese population
Angiographic evaluation of femoral bifurcation in Chinese population
Objective Common femoral artery (CFA) access has been proved to be safe with lower risk of complications in percutaneous catheterisation. The femoral head can be ...
Precision reduction of femoral neck fractures: A novel strategy based on the femoral neck fracture morphology
Precision reduction of femoral neck fractures: A novel strategy based on the femoral neck fracture morphology
Abstract Background In femoral neck fractures the secondary damage caused by repeated multiple reductions needs to be prevented. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to a...
Functional outcome of patients after shoulder hemiarthroplasty for neglected fractured proximal humerus
Functional outcome of patients after shoulder hemiarthroplasty for neglected fractured proximal humerus
Abstract Introduction. The main objective of hemiarthroplasty is to restore the shoulder into the state of fully functional and pain-free. The most important steps in perfo...
PRIMARY TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY VERSUS HEMIARTHROPLASTY FOR DISPLACED NECK FEMUR FRACTURES IN OLDER PATIENTS
PRIMARY TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY VERSUS HEMIARTHROPLASTY FOR DISPLACED NECK FEMUR FRACTURES IN OLDER PATIENTS
Objective: This study was conducted to make a comparative analysis and evaluate the outcomes of fracture neck femur in old age managed with hemiarthroplasty versus tota...

Back to Top